The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 24, 2012, 03:59 PM   #1
Ale GOlem
Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 2011
Location: Port Henry NY
Posts: 78
Ruger GP100 vs. S&W 686+ (Sheer Durability)

Based on personal aesthetic preference, price and reviews I've narrowed down my very first handgun purchase to either of the aforementioned revolvers. I have an NRA handgun training course scheduled in VT on August 4th which will allow me hands on experience with, hopefully, one or both of them. At bare minimum I'll be able to fondle them in the shop if not fire them in the course. So my question for the day is which of them will hold up for sheer durability? I'll mostly be using this as a range gun but one never knows what the future may hold and I always like to be prepared.
Ale GOlem is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 04:04 PM   #2
laytonj1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,460
Since no one has taken numerous samples of both and fired 10's of thousands of rounds thru them under controlled conditions to test for a durability advantage, any answer you get will be an opinion.
They are pretty much equal guns so get the one you like best.

Jim
laytonj1 is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 04:04 PM   #3
willmc33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 2012
Location: Mobile,Al
Posts: 473
Sheer durability I will have to cast a vote for the GP100. I think the 686+ is a better firearm overall though. The GP100 IMO will hold up to more shooting of the full power .357 rounds. The Smith is no slouch though they are durable and IME have much better triggers. Either will last a lifetime.
__________________
"Perfection is the enemy of good enough"
willmc33 is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 04:13 PM   #4
Pahoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 5,268
Too Subjective !!!

I always have a problem with posts dealing with "This Vs. That". In most cases, the subject is just too subjective. I have owned and appreciate both. Both have exceeded my expectations. ....

That being said and falling into the subjective trap, if I "had" to sell one, I'd sell the 686. .....

Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing.
Pahoo is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 04:21 PM   #5
joegator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 531
I've owned several Ruger .357s and they have all been excellent. They're both great guns so get the one you like best. You won't go wrong with either one.
joegator is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 04:23 PM   #6
excelerater
Junior member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2011
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 694
people say ruger is stronger but I have yet to wear out any of my S&Ws
IMO id rather have the better gun and trigger not a brick with a handle
which IMO ruger is
excelerater is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 04:32 PM   #7
arch308
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 876
Granted this is just hearsay but I have always heard that if you want a fine shooter to shoot every once in awhile pick a S&W, if you are gonna shoot the heck out of it pick the GP 100. I don't think you can go wrong with either.
arch308 is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 05:36 PM   #8
drail
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
They're both solid well made guns. Either one can be shot out of time or suffer forcing cone damage from lots of 110-125 gr. +P high velocity ammo. (yes, even the Ruger). The main difference is the S&W will have a better DA pull and can be made even better.
drail is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 09:19 PM   #9
Buckeye!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2008
Posts: 342
I lean toward Rugers...but the 686 is a fine handgun..I really don't think you would wear either out..
Buckeye! is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 09:32 PM   #10
SHR970
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 484
Good luck wearing either of them out.

I own a GP100, a couple friends have 686's. I never liked the finger groove grips their guns came with (they don't fit my hands) but I haven't noted any mechanical issues with their guns. We've put quite a number of "stout" rounds through them over the years.

Which ever one you find that you like better is the one to buy. Put as I do in the Rem. 870 Vs. Moss 500 questions... Ford / Chevy.....chose one.

Edit to add: A Ruger trigger can be cleaned up better than most people suspect.
SHR970 is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 11:09 PM   #11
Neal_G.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2010
Posts: 110
You shouldn't worry about this at all, BUT.. I'd be more worried about the loss of $10-15,000+ spent on the ammo it would take to wear either of those two revolvers out then about which $600-700 dollar gun will break first.
Neal_G. is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 11:45 PM   #12
Nanuk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2, 2005
Location: Where the deer and the antelope roam.
Posts: 1,671
The Smith is a better gun. It is machined forged steel. The Ruger is cast steel. The L frame Smith was designed to take a steady diet of Magnums and address the weakness of the K frame in that regard.

When the Border Patrol issued wheelguns, we had way more problems with GP 100's than we did Smiths. But the BP is only a small agency, and we only shot 1000 or so magnums a year through them. When they took my 686 from my sweaty palms I had over 10,000 rounds of mostly 125 grn magnums through it.
__________________
My rifle and pistol are tools, I am the weapon.
Nanuk is offline  
Old June 24, 2012, 11:52 PM   #13
frankgh
Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2012
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 42
I'm in the market for a 686 too. I know how good S&W service is, how is Rugers?
frankgh is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 12:08 AM   #14
Venom1956
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 2,808
just as good as S&W. on the CS.

if money isn't a factor I'd go 686. Not sure bout the 686+ because of speed loaders and such. im sure they are out there. plus six shots mean one less cylinder to clean.
__________________
E-Shock rounds are engineered to expend maximum energy into soft targets, turning the density mass into an expanding rotational cone of NyTrilium matrix particles, causing neurological collapse to the central nervous system.- Yeah I can do that.
I guarantee you will know it if a bicyclist hits your house going 1000 mph.
Venom1956 is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 02:02 AM   #15
Jim March
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,237
They're both good guns. In my opinion there's two specific use cases that might steer you towards the GP100:

1) Because the cylinder on the Ruger locks up at both the crane and the rear, in certain very nasty over-charge situations the GP100 might survive where a 686 wouldn't. Maybe. It's not a huge difference but basically the GP can retain the cylinder in place rather than dislodging under a really nasty excess handload or the like. So...if you're going to learn to handload with it, I'd go with a GP100.

2) Because the GP100 is meant to be field-stripped by the user, it has an edge in places like backwoods carry, carry around saltwater or other situations where the ability to do a total stripdown with minimal tools might be vital to keeping it running. The Ruger manual shows how to field-strip it to a level that S&W says "go see a gunsmith". Ruger includes the take-down tool you need under one of the grip panels, and even publishes a complete video on how to do it on their website for free. There's no voiding of any warrantee should you do so. The S&W is much harder to take apart and needs more and specialized tools to do so. A Ruger can be taken down wth a Swiss Army Knife or multi-pliers - you just need to get the one grip screw out.

That latter thing also means it's easy to do a home-brew spring kit and internal fluff-n-buff on the cheap that can usually take the GP's trigger feel up to the level of the S&W and often up to the standards of a good gunsmith or S&W's custom shop. See also:

http://gunner777.wordpress.com/2008/...k-of-knowledge

So all that plus the lower price? I'd get a GP100. No question. I *do* use a Ruger 357 as my daily-carry-without-fail but I'm a weirdo packing a New Vaquero .
__________________
Jim March
Jim March is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 02:19 AM   #16
youngunz4life
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
gp100
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864
youngunz4life is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 06:49 AM   #17
sheepman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2007
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 372
Pick the one you like the best,either will last most people a life time. I prefer the K frame S&W over the l frame, they just balance better (for me) and i don't shoot many magnums any way.
__________________
The best gun is the one you have when you really need one
sheepman is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 07:51 AM   #18
CarbineCaleb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Posts: 2,745
Well, the Ruger is probably the stronger gun, but I can tell you that don't hear of 686Ps being shot loose real often, so unless you're really planning to test it with tons of maximum loads (which would test you as well), for practical purposes, the 686 will last you a lifetime.
__________________
“Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.”
Niels Bohr
CarbineCaleb is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 09:22 AM   #19
gun nut
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 7, 2009
Location: midwest
Posts: 298
Get the one that feels best in YOUR hands or points best for YOU. Between the two guns I would call it a win/win. They're both excellent!
__________________
The only stupid question is the one not asked! (Unknown)
gun nut is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 06:07 PM   #20
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 11,370
Both guns will out last you with proper care. Don't get wrapped up that the Ruger is stronger than the S&W or vice versa. Both are excellent guns so simply buy the one that feels best to you.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 07:11 PM   #21
drail
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2008
Posts: 3,150
If you're worried about how strong you gun is then your ammo is TOO HOT!
drail is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 07:14 PM   #22
Olympus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2008
Posts: 585
99.99% chance that you'll never hurt either gun.
__________________
www.brownscustomgrips.com

Exhibition quality 1911 grips!
Olympus is online now  
Old June 25, 2012, 08:16 PM   #23
Crankgrinder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 24, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 634
most information you will read points to the ruger being a stronger, more utilitarian gun, and the smith to be a bit more pricey, finer finished piece but all these folks are right. If the gp's extra strength as its percieved were to come into play then maybe a .357 isnt the right calibre. I went with the gp myself due mostly to the price and simplicity, Plus I love the look. I love the look of both guns, but I like the gps that much more, and I could not bring myself to pay +800$ for one when theres one for 600& flat thatll do the same thing just as well.
Crankgrinder is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 08:44 PM   #24
tomrkba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2011
Posts: 528
Shoot Todd Green's "2,000 Round Challenge" and evaluate each gun at 1,000 and 2,000 rounds.

http://pistol-forum.com/showthread.p...ound+challenge

My guess is that both will pass with flying colors and you won't notice enough of a difference between the two to matter.

Don't forget to take photos and post the results on that forum.
tomrkba is offline  
Old June 25, 2012, 10:31 PM   #25
roaddog28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: Fallbrook, CA
Posts: 851
I have owned two 686s and two GP100s. I still own a GP100. I give the durability to the GP100. Jim March explained it well. Front and rear lockup system. Also the trigger group parts are stronger. The trigger will usually be better with the S&W. Both will shoot factory 357 magnums everyday. Like Drail said, both will suffer forcing cone erosion with constant use of 110 to 125 gr high velocity 357s.
Get the one you like and get the best deal.
Good luck,
Howard
roaddog28 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12154 seconds with 7 queries