The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 10, 2012, 02:51 AM   #1
warningshot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2009
Posts: 995
1907 .303 British Ammo discovered.

Came across some (~300) factory 303 British ammunition head stamp 1907 Do I blast it up or try to trade it for something more useful, like NATO 556x45 or 762x51 at the local gunshow?
warningshot is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 06:14 AM   #2
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,702
If you shoot it, know that it is corrosive primed and you MUST clean your rifle accordingly.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 06:25 AM   #3
CowTowner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: Cowtown of course!
Posts: 1,117
Heck, that might actually have cordite sticks for propellant in the case.
Mike is 100% correct. Treat it as corrosive if you shoot it. Personally, I'd send the rounds down range.
__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearm Safety and Pistol Instructor
"There are three classes of people: those who see, those who see when they are shown, those who do not see."
Leonardo da Vinci
CowTowner is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 07:17 AM   #4
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,702
"Heck, that might actually have cordite sticks for propellant in the case."

If it was loaded in Britain in 1907 it IS loaded with cordite. The British didn't start loading other types of nitrocellulose powders until World War I at the earliest, and then only because of the inability to make cordite quickly enough to match war demand.

If it's Canadian, it's most likely cordite but could be another form of nitrocellulose.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 07:48 AM   #5
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 2,942
Probably nothing wrong with it as long as it's been stored well.
If it says Mk VII or Mk 7, or just VII, or 7 then it is both cordite & corrosive. All non cordite was marked as Mk7z.
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 08:22 AM   #6
William T. Watts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 752
I'm surprised someone hasn't suggested pulling one of the rounds apart and inspect before firing? William
William T. Watts is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 08:26 AM   #7
Jim243
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2009
Posts: 4,342
I don't know anything about 303 or the year 1907 for that matter, but wouldn't it be worth more to a collector un-fired than shooting it down range??

Jim
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Jim243 is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 08:38 AM   #8
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,702
"I'm surprised someone hasn't suggested pulling one of the rounds apart and inspect before firing?"

Which would tell us what other than that which we already know -- cordite and corrosive.

Not really sure what the aim of that would be.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 08:55 AM   #9
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Which would tell us what other than that which we already know -- cordite and corrosive.
Implicit in this question is the assumption that the storage life of ammunition is infinite. It is not. Gunpowder deteriorates and as it deteriorates it outgases NOx.

If nitric acid gas has attacked the inside of the case, the case will be weak and may split.

Look to see if the cases have case neck splits, like this FA 11-1898 30-40 Krag round.



Pull some bullets and look for evidence of internal case corrosion. If the bullets have green corrioson, from nitric acid gas, don’t shoot the ammunition.



Dump some of the cordite out and see if it is red. This powder is red. All the stabilizer is gone and the nitrocellulose is deteriorating.



Firing powder this old is risky due to burn rate instability. Powder grains deteriorate in an uneven fashion and they will burn in an uneven fashion. This has caused pressure spikes. Which can blew your rifle all to pieces.

Take a look at this Garand which blew with WWII ammunition.

http://www.socnet.com/showthread.php?p=1344088
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 09:58 AM   #10
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,702
"Dump some of the cordite out and see if it is red. This powder is red. All the stabilizer is gone and the nitrocellulose is deteriorating."

Actually, that powder is very likely perfectly fine.

That is the native color of what is most likely Du Pont WA 30 (spun off to Hercules in 1912 when the Government forced the break up of the Du Pont powder monopoly), one of the original smokeless powders used in the .30-40 Krag military loading.

Powder in that time frame generally did not use a graphite coating as is found in today's powders. If you remove the graphite coating from a modern powder, you're going to find colors very similar to what you see in that .30-40 round.

Also, stabilizers as we know them today? The powder industry didn't introduce anything like that in the United States until about 1910-1912.

If the powder were actually physically breaking down, you'd get a red to brown colored dust forming on the powder. I see no evidence of that -- just straight old nitrocellulose powder that's in fine shape for being 100 or so years old.

Cordite was also uncoated, and in color was VERY similar to what you see in the powder in that .30-40. I have pulled the bullets on British .303 ammo loaded in the WW I and WW II eras, and also on Pakastani/Indian ammo loaded in the 1950s and 1960s. The color of the cordite, even with the 50 year span, is identical.

Neck cracking in rounds of that age are, often as not, due to the fact that case annealing either wasn't done in US military ammo. Annealing of arsenal manufactured cases generally didn't start until just before World War I, and during the war was often skipped because of the need to get ammo to the troops.

.30-06 ammo from the WW I era often shows cracked necks but no indication of powder breakdown.

Even if the powder has started to break down, weakening the case, it's largely a non issue in that neck splits are fully contained in the chamber.

Soviet and combloc surplus military ammo, especially in 7.62x54R, often splits on firing.

Finally, while that's an interesting thread on that M1, there's no positive evidence that deteoriated powder is what caused the gun to detonate. It looks to me that it could have just as easily been an out-of-battery condition, a pierced primer, or a a flaw that allowed the case head to split (FAR more dangerous than a split in the case neck).

Over the years I've fired significant quantities of US and foreign military ammo that has been loaded with smokeless powder, some of it even older than 1907.

Other than a bunch of Greek post war crap that showed a huge propensity for hang fires, the only problem I've ever had has been dead primers and case neck splits.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 10:21 AM   #11
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,702
Hey Slamfire and anyone else interested in the early history of US smokeless powders...

Lookie what I just found! Neat!

http://www.castpics.net/subsite2/Gen...-Smokeless.pdf
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 12:44 PM   #12
wogpotter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2004
Posts: 2,942
Hmm lets see, we pull the bullet & look down inside the case neck. What do we see?
Why a small piece of cardboard! Umm, OK! I didn't know there was a card disk in here??? Yup an over powder disk to reduce erosion (or supposedly so).

So next we fish the card disk out & tap the case mouth gently on a table, what happens? Nothing OK bang it harder, still nothing! Beat the dogsnot out of it, now what.

Sadly, "pulling the sticks of cordite" is much harder than you'd think, because the charge was loaded into a primed, but not finally necked down case & then the primed & charged case was necked down so the charge is really, really tight in there.

Imagine passing that manufacturing process past OSHA nowadays!
__________________
Allan Quatermain: “Automatic rifles. Who in God's name has automatic rifles”?

Elderly Hunter: “That's dashed unsporting. Probably Belgium.”
wogpotter is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 01:41 PM   #13
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 4,010
That was a very interesting document.


Anyone notice this:

Quote:
The author does not recommend nor even suggest that anyone load or shoot any of the old powders under discussion, should any be found. These old powders may have suffered deterioration over the century since they were made, which could make their performance erratic, unpredictable, and dangerous. Any old powders that appear to have a reddish dust or an acrid acidic odor should be immediately disposed of in a safe manner, as recommended by SAAMI. (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute

So stabilizers were used around 1910. That would mean that ammunition made in 1907 would not have stabilizers in the powder. Or that Krag ammunition.

Stabilizers are in the powder for very good reasons:

Section from the Army Propellant Management Guide:

Stabilizers are chemical ingredients added to propellant at time of manufacture to decrease the rate of propellant degradation and reduce the probability of auto ignition during its expected useful life.

As nitrocellulose-based propellants decompose, they release nitrogen oxides. If the nitrogen oxides are left free to react in the propellant, they can react with the nitrate ester, causing further decomposition and additional release of nitrogen oxides. The reaction between the nitrate ester and the nitrogen oxides is exothermic (i.e., the reaction produces heat). Heat increases the rate of propellant decomposition. More importantly, the exothermic nature of the reaction creates a problem if sufficient heat is generated to initiate combustion. Chemical additives, referred to as stabilizers, are added to propellant formulations to react with free nitrogen oxides to prevent their attack on the nitrate esters in the propellant. The stabilizers are scavengers that act rather like sponges, and once they become “saturated” they are no longer able to remove nitrogen oxides from the propellant. Self-heating of the propellant can occur unabated at the “saturation” point without the ameliorating effect of the stabilizer. Once begun, the self-heating may become sufficient to cause auto ignition.


When I described what I had learned about the lifetime of gunpowder to a machine gunner friend, he said that explained the top cover explosions he had had with 1950’s Yugo ammunition.

Might be a reason for the reports of explosions with Indian surplus. Gunpowder deteriorates faster in heat, and lower India has incredible heat waves.

I have found a lot of the push back on the topic of old ammunition comes from people who stockpiled massive amounts of gunpowder and surplus ammunition. Those folks really do not want to hear that gunpowder has a shelf life. Nor do they want to hear that it might blow up their guns.

Sorry.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 03:10 PM   #14
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 1,399
I fired a lot of surplus over the years and got a lot of split necks. I always thought that the brass hardened up with time.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 03:34 PM   #15
William T. Watts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 752
Quote:
Which would tell us what other than that which we already know -- cordite and corrosive. Not really sure what the aim of that would be.
While the pictures aren't of the actual ammunition in question what I see is enough to discourage me from firing anything 100 years old.. No way would I fire that ammo thru a rifle of mine... William
William T. Watts is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 03:40 PM   #16
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
I fired a lot of surplus over the years and got a lot of split necks. I always thought that the brass hardened up with time
.


Could be, but could be due to the NOx from old powder.

I loaded 700 LC Match cases with surplus IMR 4895. The stuff shot well but occasionally I got “funny” retorts and sticky extraction. Within a year of loading I got a high percentage of cracked case necks in fired ammunition. Then unfired ammunition started cracking.

I pulled all the match bullets, found a number with little green spots like the pictures above.

The powder had a neutral smell in the jug.

Old surplus ammunition is on the market for a reason. There is a reason it is cheap. The military that owned it did not want to issue the stuff to their soldiers. They also did not want the stuff auto igniting in their ammunition dumps.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.
Slamfire is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 05:16 PM   #17
serf 'rett
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 25, 2009
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 1,284
In addition to flogging the powder issue with multiple opinions (yes, I know, you have facts, while the others just have faulty based opinions ) let’s not forget to mention that the bullets may have corroded and seized in the necks and created a possible bigger bang for your buck (or maybe that neck seizing thing’s a fallacious theory I read about somewhere ).

IF I succumbed to the temptation of lighting off a few of these relics, I’d be tempted to chuck a few up in the press and check how much pressure it takes to move the bullet a tad downward and then disassemble the few rounds for inspection, not that I’d know much about what to look for besides funky smell, dust in the powder, moisture, clumping, grain uniformity, brittle brass, green corrosion spots….
__________________
A lack of planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an emergency on my part.
serf 'rett is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 06:17 PM   #18
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,702
Serf,

Neck seizing isn't an issue in brass cases loaded with guilding metal bullets.

Neck seizing was a HUGE issue in earlier cupronickel jacketed bullets and brass cases, even worse with tin plated cases, IIRC.

Hatcher discusses this in his Notebook. He said after early National Matches where such ammo was fired it was not uncommon to find fired bullets with the neck of the cartridge case still attached. The pressures generated to force that combination through the bore must have been dramatic.


Slam, yep, I'm familiar with the military publication you reference.

What it doesn't mention is that double-base propellants like Cordite, WA .30, etc., are apparently far more resistant to this kind of deteoriation than single-base propellants (IMR powders are all singlebase propellants, Du Pont kept those in the 1912 break up while Hercules kept the double-base propellants).

We'll talk more later, Mom's calling me for dinner (visiting family!) this is a really fascinating discussion.

Bottom line is, though, I wouldn't have any issues putting that 1907 .303 ammo in my Lee Enfield and sending it down range.

Your IMR 4895, any idea as to its age/date of manufacture? Could it have been some of the lots left over from World War II? You don't want to know the kinds of corners that were cut in production during World War II.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 06:52 PM   #19
Slamfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 27, 2007
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Your IMR 4895, any idea as to its age/date of manufacture? Could it have been some of the lots left over from World War II? You don't want to know the kinds of corners that were cut in production during World War II.
No, neither did the seller. I picked it up at Camp Perry on Commercial Row.

The idea that gunpowder has a shelf life was news to the seller, I saw him last year and talked about it. Since he made a living selling surplus powders, it was not something he wanted to hear, probably thought I was part of the lunatic fringe.

After all, conventional wisdom is that gunpowder lasts forever.

I have more surplus IMR 4895, powder I bought before I was aware of all this, and I am shooting it up as fast as match schedules allow.

I am no longer buying old powder. No longer going to buy powder dating back before the 80's. I had about 16 pounds of surplus IMR 4895 go bad before, but I chalked it up to being poorly made powder. I had no idea of the underlining chemistry or that gunpowder had a lifetime.

Gunpowder is a high energy molecule and it will degrade to become a low energy molecule.

From http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/783499.pdf

Quote:
Nitrocellulose-base propellants are essentially unstable materials
that decompose on aging with the evolution of oxides of nitrogen. The
decomposition is autocatalytic and can lead to failure of the ammunition
or disastrous explosions. Many substances have been used to stabilize
nitrocellulose-base propellants,but by far the most widely used substance
is diphenylamine (DPA).
If you are aware of the publication then you are aware that the military scraps ammunition when the master sample goes bad and the powder out in the field has less than 20% stabilizer left.

I had a link to a really good article at www.dtic.mil and now it is busted. However, you can go there and search under insensitive munitions, stabilizer, and diphenylamine and find all sorts of information on gunpowders and aging.

This is a good article:

http://www.almc.army.mil/alog/issues...t_stab_eq.html

Quote:
Hatcher discusses this in his Notebook. He said after early National Matches where such ammo was fired it was not uncommon to find fired bullets with the neck of the cartridge case still attached. The pressures generated to force that combination through the bore must have been dramatic.
Yes, cold welding was not well understood in 1921. The Army tin plated bullets and in time, the tin welded to the case neck. That was cause of all the pressure problems they were having with the tin can ammunition. In 1947, when Hatcher is writing his book, he totally misdirects the blame away from the Ordnance Department to greased bullets and civilians. Something that Col Townsend Whelen, who made that tin can ammunition, also did for the rest of his life.
__________________
If I'm not shooting, I'm reloading.

Last edited by Slamfire; April 10, 2012 at 07:00 PM.
Slamfire is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 10:47 PM   #20
warningshot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 7, 2009
Posts: 995
Great responses.

Thanks to one and all...

When I can figure-out how to post pictures on TFL I'll be glad to do so.

The ammo came from a WWI and WWII re-inactor. I have a boat load of new .303 blanks too. I havn't any idea what I'm going to do with the blanks, yet.

Family wants to keep the WWI Lee Enfield rifle. Headspacing checked out, but I'd rather shoot the Garands & M1As than the Enfield. Tisk Tisk. Such a hard task having to blast up .303 ammo. Will I survive? Just to be safe, I'll pack along a chicken sandwich.

I am not new to reloading & digital photography so I'll be glad to update all concearned when I catch-up to circa 2004 picture posting computer technology.
warningshot is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 03:36 PM   #21
mete
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 5,283
Neck splits -- this is stress corrosion cracking .The Brits first noticed it in India but it happened only in the wet season thus referred to as 'season cracking' . It requires stress [un annealed brass case necks] , and corrosion [moisture from the rain and nitrogen and ammonia compounds from lightning braking down the nitrogen in the air] .It's not caused by the powder.
It's not uncommon to see it in old military ammo .
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver !
mete is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 04:41 PM   #22
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,188
The Wikipedia entry on Season Cracking is actually pretty good. They say it wasn't explained chemically until 1921, but I see no reference as to when annealing necks to prevent it was figured out (presumably empirically) or when it was begun as a manufacturing process or by whom. You'd figure the Brits would have been on to it first, but I don't actually know. I keep thinking Hatcher said something about it and had the impression it was after WWI, but I'm probably confusing it with when they stopped polishing the annealing stain off before loading to leave the cases with better corrosion resistance. I'm not finding the subject in the index of his Notebook, so that means rereading to locate it.

On another forum a member who's a former Aberdeen Proving Grounds Test Director described bullet pulling tests on old stockpiled ammo that found up to something like 600 lbs force was needed to pull some of the bullets. Ten times normal. He claimed it fired just fine, though. So the tin plate bonding must have been really strong.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Patron Member

Last edited by Unclenick; April 11, 2012 at 04:46 PM.
Unclenick is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 05:14 PM   #23
glicerin
Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Location: Northern Ontario
Posts: 36
brit 303

wog was right on. I have never seen red cordite, just long sticks of tan color. WWll stuff was good but corrosive, WWl stuff would sometimes hangfire or misfire(maintain safe direction for 60 seconds according to our safety books). Keep some for the history and fire the rest.
glicerin is offline  
Old April 12, 2012, 11:02 PM   #24
Ideal Tool
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 6, 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,080
Years ago, I pulled a bullet on a 1918 dated .303 British..found the shellacked wad & packed tight Cordite. pulled out a few strands with needlenose.
At work, there was a guy who had the idea he had to be better than everyone else..oneupmanship up the wazoo. One day I got fed up with his bragging..took one of his cigs when he was away & carefully used 1/16" drill spun in fingers & bored hole thru center. stuffed a Cordite string in there about 1/4" down from end..placed it first in line back in pack. After lunch, I asked him if he could smoke a cig. right down to filter without a break..No problemo....well, after that smokeless ignited..he sort of got a panicked look on his face..but of course he couldn't quit!..then he started turning green about the gills..seemed in an awful hurry to get to the can when he finally finished it!
Ideal Tool is offline  
Old April 16, 2012, 08:31 AM   #25
davery25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 291
i can't believe this brilliant post has ended!
davery25 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13502 seconds with 7 queries