The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 1, 2012, 06:16 PM   #1
hammered54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2010
Location: Pinckney,Michigan
Posts: 107
Remington 870 stock

I posted this in the shotgun forum also to see if anyone there would know.
I'm looking at a tactical rear stock for the 870 and was wondering if the stocks are interchangeable with any of the other Remington Models...such as the 742,
they sure look the same from photos and it sure would be cool on my 742....with a bi pod of course.

thanks Matt
hammered54 is offline  
Old April 1, 2012, 08:36 PM   #2
rbernie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2004
Location: Plain Ol', TX
Posts: 713
If I recall correctly, the 74xx and 76xx buttstocks are interchangeable with the 20ga 870 receiver and not the larger 12ga receiver.
__________________
-A conclusion is not a destination, it's simply a convenient place to stop thinking.-
-Reading a thing doesn't automatically make it so; repeating it doesn't necessarily make it any truer.-
-Every Texan should be a member of the Texas State Rifle Association.
rbernie is offline  
Old April 2, 2012, 02:12 PM   #3
hammered54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2010
Location: Pinckney,Michigan
Posts: 107
well......nothing a file couldn't fix.....



bringing an old horse into the 21 century, now for a new scope and a fore stock.

Matt.
hammered54 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06115 seconds with 9 queries