The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old March 8, 2012, 10:28 PM   #1
Willie Sutton
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
So how about NJ next?

Maryland outcome is great news. How about a parallel effort in NJ where the laws are "may issue", but are really "never issue" based on the law calling for the issuance of a permit only to those showing a need that benefits the public, not the individual. Seems time to challenge this and end rationing of rights in yet another place.

Gents?

Willie
Willie Sutton is offline  
Old March 8, 2012, 11:02 PM   #2
Al Norris
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,322
You haven't been following the 2A cases thread, have you!

34. Piszczatoski v. Maenz (was Muller): Filed on 11-22-2010, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. David D. Jensen and Robert P. Firriolo attorneys for the plaintiffs. This is another SAF civil rights suit that seeks to divest State authorities, in a facial challenge, of their uncontrolled discretion to deny permits to carry and in the case of Superior Court Judges, uncontrolled discretion to limit or restrict licenses.

This case is now in the 3rd Circuit. See this thread for details: http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=434336
Al Norris is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05970 seconds with 9 queries