The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 5, 2012, 03:33 PM   #1
Nitesites
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 2011
Posts: 600
Home Invasion Turns Deadly Right Down The Road

A home invasion occurred very recently near my residence. Some key points in the following article reinforce some ideas that have been discussed on The Firing Line recently...http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/cr...-home-invasion.

The article does not mention whether the invaders were are armed but does go on to quote the local law enforcement deemed deadly force was indeed justifiable in this instance. Also, one of the victims/tenants was able to defend those inside armed with only a .22cal rifle (two separate points - .22cal and it was through a rifle). Further, multiple assailants are present. It seems in this particular case that only two rounds were needed; though a horrible issue, kudos to the young hero for aiming straight and true.

Any thoughts going on face value?
__________________
On Yellow
Nitesites is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 03:42 PM   #2
BarryLee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 2,737
The article was unclear as to whether they kicked the door down or forced their way in after the door was opened. It sounds as if it was the later, but either way it is important to verify the identity of the person on the other side of the door before it is opened. The best locks and doors in the world are no good if we open the door.
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.
- Milton Friedman
BarryLee is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 03:48 PM   #3
Nitesites
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 2011
Posts: 600
True, no specific mention if the the door was opened by the victims or if the assailants busted it down. It does seem to imply that the door was opened by one of the victims and then the assailants then forced their way in.
__________________
On Yellow
Nitesites is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 03:55 PM   #4
Nitesites
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 2011
Posts: 600
Also, this is not considered a high crime rate area AFAIK. What I am implying is that though you are not looking for trouble, there are times when trouble is looking for you.
__________________
On Yellow
Nitesites is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 03:57 PM   #5
9ballbilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2008
Location: northeast Florida
Posts: 435
Seems to me this type of home invasion crime is becoming more prevalent every year. While I don't carry at home it certainly provides sufficient justification for those who do. I do keep a loaded revolver in my nightstand and feel that as a Parent it would be irresponsible to not have the means to protect my family readily at hand.

NOTE: I live in a small house and my nightstand is never more than 2-3 seconds away.
9ballbilly is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 03:57 PM   #6
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: IN
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Nitesites
Home Invasion Turns Deadly Right Down The Road
A few of things...
- Always be armed (i.e. pistol on your person)
- Lock your doors and turn the alarm (if you have on) on when you are home
- Know who you are opening your door to

There was a home invasion about a mile from our house last month. The husband was away on business. The wife answered the door and the BGs forced themselves inside, pistol whipped the people, tied them up, and took cash & jewelry.
__________________
"With great power, there must also come great responsibility." - Stan Lee

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
Onward Allusion is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 06:59 PM   #7
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,310
One of my friends was murdered years ago in a home invasion by a couple of drug dealers that were going after a guy that shorted them in a drug deal. They went into the wrong house, ansd were shooting first. They murdered a 17 year old honor student two weeks away from graduating high school. This was in a town where pretty much the only felonies that happened were DUI's, or the rare occasion that they found in drugs in a car they pulled over.

Bad things can happen in good neighborhoods too, or in those middle of nowhere towns as well.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 07:29 PM   #8
Hansam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 763
Its things like this that I ALWAYS carry. I live in WI so prior to our recently enacted CCW law I couldn't carry outside my personal property. About 11 years ago I lived in an apartment with my now ex-wife and she was always complaining about how I kept a gun on me when we were at home. I told her I'd keep a gun on me when we're away from home too if I weren't breaking the law.

Anyway that year my next door neighbor (literally the next door down the hall) was the subject of a home invasion similar to this - they knocked on his door and the pushed their way in. He was stuck on the head with a flap jack, hog tied and left bleeding in a corner of his living room while they looted his apartment. I heard the noise and commotion and went to investigate. I opened my door to find three men with bandannas on their faces carrying a TV and some other electronics out of my neighbor's place. With my right hand on my 1911 carried at 3 o'clock in an OWB holster I asked them what they were doing. They all turned to look at me, saw I was armed and dropped their cargo and ran.

I went into my neighbor's place to find him tied up so I cut him loose and dialed 911. Luckily for him he only lost some electronics. The crooks hadn't made it to his bedroom yet where he kept a loaded Kel-tec 9mm in his night stand.

If he were armed he might have been able to avoid being struck, bound and robbed.

I'm always armed and I make sure I know who I'm opening the door to. Same goes with my wife.
__________________
This is who we are, what we do.
Hansam is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 07:47 PM   #9
Mello2u
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,424
The linked article is another great example of the low standard of American journalism. It is lacking in reporting the important facts.

How did the invaders gain entrance?
Who were the occupants and how many were in the apartment which was invaded?
What was the weapon used to defend? ".22-caliber rifle" is the inadequate description? It could be a rimfire or any of a number of 22 caliber center fire cartridges.
How or why is shooting the invader in the back justified in this case?

Basic newspaper journalism should objectively report the facts and answer: who, what, when, where and why.
__________________
NRA Life Member - Orange Gunsite Member - NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society,
they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it.
" Frederic Bastiat
Mello2u is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 09:14 PM   #10
Dwight55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,562
This is the exact reason that my next purchase will most likely be a small 1911 with crimson trace lazer on it.

I can wear the thing appendix carry, even sitting at the computer, . . .

I've been looking, . . . haven't found the right one yet, . . . but I saw a couple of nice little ones last weekend at the gun show, . . . $1000 each.

I need something a bit less expensive.

May God bless,
Dwight
__________________
www.dwightsgunleather.com
If you can breathe, . . . thank God!
If you can read, . . . thank a teacher!
If you are reading this in English, . . . thank a Veteran!
Dwight55 is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 09:19 PM   #11
ltc444
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Vernon AZ
Posts: 1,195
one comment:

Good Shooting young man.
ltc444 is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 11:15 PM   #12
drifts1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Posts: 136
i can think of one scenerio were i would shoot a BG in the back. If he is in between me and my loved ones and heading towards them........i'm shootin!
drifts1 is offline  
Old March 5, 2012, 11:29 PM   #13
Hiker 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 505
It seems like this is starting to take on an always-carry-at-home theme, so I'll try to bring it back around.

The 15 year old kid was not carrying and repelled a home invasion with two shots from a .22.

Some thoughts -
1. Someone taught that kid to shoot and to be decisive. Good for him.
2. The .22 was probably already loaded and within easy reach. Again good.
3. In a Castle Doctrine state, which I assume Georgia is, shooting a home invader "in the back" will not likely be relevant as long as it's inside the dwelling.
4. Like all predators, BG's don't want to get hurt. Once the prey fought back, the other BG high-tailed it out of there.
Hiker 1 is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 06:49 AM   #14
rebs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 2,228
IMHO forced entry is forced entry, it doesn't matter if you open the door or not. If they broke the door down or entered after you opened the door, they still forced their way in. They were not invited in.
rebs is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 07:33 AM   #15
TexasJustice7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 10, 2011
Posts: 213
Quote:
MellowToYou: How did the invaders gain entrance?
Who were the occupants and how many were in the apartment which was invaded?
What was the weapon used to defend? ".22-caliber rifle" is the inadequate description? It could be a rimfire or any of a number of 22 caliber center fire cartridges.
How or why is shooting the invader in the back justified in this case?
I read the article of the OP. Had this happened in Texas would have been the same result. The BG might have been shot in the back when he turned to run out. Too late if he is inside the home. In fact if he had ran outside the with some loot and got shot in the back would not have mattered in Texas. Could be different in Georgia. Hope that in the future
the occupants learned a lesson, ie. to stop the instruder coming in, instead of of discovering that two of them are already inside. I prefer a heavier calibre
weapon for h/d. Perhaps the other intruder learned a lesson too. He might consider plying his trade in another state, where homeowners can't defend themselves.
TexasJustice7 is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 09:32 AM   #16
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague County, Texas
Posts: 10,428
Quote:
It seems in this particular case that only two rounds were needed...

Any thoughts going on face value?
Actually, we have no idea how many rounds were needed. We do know (from other articles) that two rounds were fired and struck one of the invaders who died. It may have been that the invaders would have left once they saw the gun or after just one shot being fired.

Quote:
1. Someone taught that kid to shoot and to be decisive. Good for him.
4. Like all predators, BG's don't want to get hurt. Once the prey fought back, the other BG high-tailed it out of there.
Maybe the kid was taught to shoot, maybe not. It really isn't too hard to hit a human-sized target at inside home distances with a rifle (which goes back to Nitesites' reference to other threads which involve the utility of a long gun in home defense). While many rational predators don't want to get hurt, determined and drugged up predators don't always realize they are getting hurt and in the latter case, don't always have any concerns about getting hurt.

Quote:
The linked article is another great example of the low standard of American journalism. It is lacking in reporting the important facts.

How did the invaders gain entrance?
Who were the occupants and how many were in the apartment which was invaded?
What was the weapon used to defend? ".22-caliber rifle" is the inadequate description? It could be a rimfire or any of a number of 22 caliber center fire cartridges.
How or why is shooting the invader in the back justified in this case?

Basic newspaper journalism should objectively report the facts and answer: who, what, when, where and why.
That is a pretty thorough contradiction, Mello2u. In the paper's defense, the paper may not have been provided by the police with the additional information you wanted and the invaded family certainly may not have wanted to speak with the cops.

So you state that journalism needs to meed your 4 W criteria, and then complain because it doesn't answer How.

The article does satisfy your stated criteria...
who - the key players are named
what - home invasion shooting
when - stated in the article
why - self defense

Quote:
How did the invaders gain entrance?
Who were the occupants and how many were in the apartment which was invaded?
What was the weapon used to defend? ".22-caliber rifle" is the inadequate description? It could be a rimfire or any of a number of 22 caliber center fire cartridges.
How or why is shooting the invader in the back justified in this case?
I am not sure that any of this information is particularly necessary to print. Entry was through the door, but the paper didn't waste text in detailing this. No doubt if they would have stated it overtly, you would be complaining that the door's composition and door lock brand name were not stated.

Why do you need to know how many people were in the apartment? Even though the weapon used was stated, you think the information in inadequate. Why does the reader need to know about the cartridge type? If the cartridge type was stated, would you not need to know the construction of the bullet and the velocity at which it left the defender's barrel?

As for how or why shooting the invader in the back is justified, there is no law, not even in Georgia, that states what anatomical areas are illegal to shoot. As the shooting was obviously a self defense shooting against intruders and the law doesn't state anatomical locations, there is no reason to explain why the location of the impact is legal.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher."
-- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 11:02 AM   #17
TailGator
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,990
There has been research into the effect of reaction times on the decisions to start and stop firing, and it is quite possible for an assailant to change orientation (in this instance by turning away) in the amount of time that a decision is made and acted upon by the brain, nerves, and muscles. IOW, it is quite possible that a shooter can start the process of pulling the trigger while an assailant is facing him/her and still shoot the BG in the back if he turns during the trigger pull.

IIRC, the info was from Force Institute. I'll post a link or two later if I can find it.
TailGator is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 01:09 PM   #18
TexasJustice7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 10, 2011
Posts: 213
Quote:
Tailgator: There has been research into the effect of reaction times on the decisions to start and stop firing, and it is quite possible for an assailant to change orientation (in this instance by turning away) in the amount of time that a decision is made and acted upon by the brain, nerves, and muscles. IOW, it is quite possible that a shooter can start the process of pulling the trigger while an assailant is facing him/her and still shoot the BG in the back if he turns during the trigger pull.

IIRC, the info was from Force Institute. I'll post a link or two later if I can find it.
In reference to your comment mentioning the BG being shot in the back, and the decision time to stop firing, in a book I have by Michael Martin on Concealed Carry it quotes the Tempe Study, regarding an attacker being shot in the back and says that 2/10s of a second the BG could complete that movement of turning and the defender might require 5/10 of a second to stop shooting. I figure that might have been what actually happened here.
BG saw the gun, started turning to run, got shot in the back before the
15 year old boy could stop his reaction to the BG.
TexasJustice7 is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 02:13 PM   #19
Onward Allusion
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2009
Location: IN
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Hiker 1
It seems like this is starting to take on an always-carry-at-home theme, so I'll try to bring it back around.

The 15 year old kid was not carrying and repelled a home invasion with two shots from a .22.
Ah, but if the kid was carrying - it may have only taken a single shot or no shots at all.
__________________
"With great power, there must also come great responsibility." - Stan Lee

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
Onward Allusion is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 04:33 PM   #20
JN01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 501
Quote:
He was stuck on the head with a flap jack
That pancake must have been coated with maple syrup. Damn IHOP will sell those things to anyone. Where is Sarah Brady when you need her?

On a serious note, bad things can happen anywhere. Being armed wherever and whenever you can just seems prudent.
JN01 is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 08:25 PM   #21
skoro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,719
Good shooting, young man.

One can only imagine what would have happened if the criminals would have had a free hand in that apartment.
skoro is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 08:43 PM   #22
dabigguns357
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2008
Location: Ona,West Virginia
Posts: 1,215
And this is why i set up security camera's and carry at home at all times.
__________________
it's better to have a gun on your hip than one to your head
dabigguns357 is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 11:29 PM   #23
Hiker 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 505
Ah, but if the kid was carrying - it may have only taken a single shot or no shots at all.

Not really relevant as very few, if any, 15 year olds are going to be carrying at home.
Hiker 1 is offline  
Old March 6, 2012, 11:30 PM   #24
Hiker 1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 505
Actually, we have no idea how many rounds were needed. We do know (from other articles) that two rounds were fired and struck one of the invaders who died. It may have been that the invaders would have left once they saw the gun or after just one shot being fired.

Yes, but the OP asked for thoughts on the face value of the article, not analysis of incomplete information.
Hiker 1 is offline  
Old March 7, 2012, 01:16 AM   #25
Mello2u
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,424
Double Naught Spy,

The linked article only described the firearm as: "a .22-caliber rifle".
That could be anything from a bolt action .22 rim fire to an AR15 which fires a 5.56x39 center fire cartridge which is much more powerful. Also, the AR15 is often referred to by the "antis" as an Assault Weapon! OMG!

We should not assume what the weapon was. The article should identify it. I'd like to know if an "Assault Weapon" was used to defend a home. If so, it would be nice to use this information when someone states that assault weapons are useless to law abiding people. But I can't because the article does not tell us what the rifle was.

I would like to know how the invaders gained entry. Might learn something from someone's mistake.

The article does state: "The 15-year-old will not be charged because his actions are considered justifiable homicide, according to sheriff’s Capt. Steve Morris." I am not a reporter. But, I have seen reporters dig for more from authorities to get more than a statement. I would like to know the reasoning behind this. I live in Georgia and would like all the information I can get of this type, that I don't have to spend blood or money to get.

The article did answer who, when and where; but in my opinion failed to answer what and why.
What was the weapon used to defend the home?
Why did the sheriff's department decide this was a justified shooting?

I am not passing judgment on the actions of the people involved in the shooting. I really want to know those facts about this incident.
__________________
NRA Life Member - Orange Gunsite Member - NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society,
they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it.
" Frederic Bastiat
Mello2u is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.14175 seconds with 9 queries