The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 18, 2012, 08:16 PM   #1
Irish B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 359
.22-250 capabilities

What's the largest thing you would feel comfortable taking cleanly with a .22-250? What's the smallest thing you would feel comfortable taking without annihilating?
__________________
If a man hasn't found something worth dying for, he isn't fit to live
Irish B is offline  
Old February 18, 2012, 09:57 PM   #2
BIG P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,569
Have taken hogs just over 300 lbs, 170lb. deer.
Small game groundhog if they're far enough away.
If inside 100yds. its a mess but the buzzards still like them.
BIG P is offline  
Old February 18, 2012, 10:06 PM   #3
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 2,214
I shoot a 220, which is about the same thing. If you use the right bullet (Nosler Partition or its equal) you can shoot pigs and deer, but that really isn't a good caliber for that use, but yes you can do it. As for small stuff, I shot a crow once and mostly all that was left was a cloud of feathers.
603Country is offline  
Old February 18, 2012, 10:19 PM   #4
bcarver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2007
Location: Jackson,Mississippi
Posts: 836
proper caliber

I would say coyotes would be the largest. I would not worry about overkill.
I would use the .22-250 on anything I was not gonna eat.
I have heard of elephants killed with 22 rimfire but it is just not the right caliber. For hogs and deer I would want a .243 at least and would prefer a .270.
bcarver is offline  
Old February 19, 2012, 11:51 AM   #5
L_Killkenny
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
Largest = coyotes. Smallest "without" annihilating = coyote. .22-250 sure can make a mess of fox.

LK
L_Killkenny is offline  
Old February 19, 2012, 07:10 PM   #6
samsmix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2006
Location: Montana (Montucky?)
Posts: 617
I hail from Montana, and we have big bodied deer here. My ex-wife shot a mulie with a .257 Roberts 100gr bullet @ 2900fps, that weighed 218lbs field dressed. I shot a whitetail last year that dressed out at 208lbs. Her .257 felled her buck just as instantly as my '06.

I would not hesitate to use a .22-250 with heavy for caliber bullets. I would keep my shots under 300yards, and my angles within 45 degrees of broadside. IF YOU HIT THE VITALS, IT WILL DIE IN SHORT ORDER. Short of poor bullets or bad hits, there is no refuting this simple truth. Many deer, antelope, and even elk (for which I call .270 a practical minimum) that "get away after a perfect hit" were not hit so perfectly after all, but pride and testosterone will not let the hunter admit it.

There is a chamber adapter that will allow you to shoot .22lr at rabbits, but failing that you should use lightly loaded fmjs with head shots for small game. If you hit meat, well...KA-BOOM!

Pelt hunters out here (I know a few pros) differ between light HPs for no exit wounds, and FMJs for small holes.

I met a local man with a detatched retina who uses a .223 for elk, but he gets within 100yards and basically "bowhunts with a rifle", but I think this would be pushing the fast .22s a bit too far, especially if one has better options.
__________________
You'll probably never NEED a gun. I hope you never do. But IF you do, you will need it worse than anything you've ever needed in your life.

IF we're not supposed to eat animals,
howcome God made 'em outta meat?

Last edited by samsmix; February 19, 2012 at 07:36 PM.
samsmix is offline  
Old February 20, 2012, 07:31 AM   #7
Mobuck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 2,116
I question why you're concerned about the 22/250 destroying a smaller varmint animal. Few if any hunters eat stuff like groundhogs, rock chucks, or prairie dogs. In most cases the detructive damage is a plus as it lessens the chance of a critter dragging off to die under someones porch or barn.
While I've shot deer with a 22/250 and killed them cleanly, I don't consider it an appropriate or even adequate deer round. Sooner or later a bullet won't hit just where it should or at the perfect angle and the kill won't be quick or clean. There are so many better deer cartridges that only the odd occasion would permit the use of the 22 centerfires for deer.
I'm sure there will be some snotty comeback on this opinion but I stand by it. Really, if you can't handle a suitable cartridge, don't brag about being inadequate.
Mobuck is offline  
Old February 20, 2012, 12:45 PM   #8
shortwave
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,930
I'm in the 'yote' group, for the largest animal with the 22-250 in this area.

Course, not to many mt. lions around these parts but it may be a descent rd for them. The cat hunters can chime in on that one.
shortwave is offline  
Old February 20, 2012, 01:45 PM   #9
MOshooter65202
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 16, 2011
Posts: 470
I know the 22-250 will kill deer,however for my choice coyote size game will be the largest I hunt with my 22-250. The smallest game any varmint that's at the wrong place at the wrong time
MOshooter65202 is offline  
Old February 20, 2012, 03:51 PM   #10
Noonan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 23, 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 147
Not me personally...

But my close friend shot a 17 point buck that scored 193 7/8 with a 22-250. Neck shot at 200 yards.
Noonan is offline  
Old February 20, 2012, 04:11 PM   #11
spclPatrolGroup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 349
I would agree with the coyote\coyote answer. Although if you are interested in selling the pelt the 22-250 is almost on the overkill side, you are better off with a 220 swift or even a 223. But it is fun to see a prarie dog get launched in the air by a 22-250 and a balistic tip.
spclPatrolGroup is offline  
Old February 20, 2012, 04:56 PM   #12
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,350
Er, uh, the Swift and the .22-250 are basically identical, as far as velocity.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old February 20, 2012, 11:02 PM   #13
samsmix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2006
Location: Montana (Montucky?)
Posts: 617
M previous post aside, I do think that proper deer rifles are .25 caliber and up. The key to killing deer cleanly with a fast .22 is...restraint.
__________________
You'll probably never NEED a gun. I hope you never do. But IF you do, you will need it worse than anything you've ever needed in your life.

IF we're not supposed to eat animals,
howcome God made 'em outta meat?
samsmix is offline  
Old February 21, 2012, 10:38 AM   #14
Logan9885
Member
 
Join Date: January 28, 2011
Posts: 81
All bout the bullet you use. A 60gr nolser partition on deer=fresh meat. That same bullet on a fox big mess. I use 55 gr nosler ballistic tips for fox and b-cats to save hides, 99.9 % of the time there is no exit with the ballistic tip even on foxes.
Logan9885 is offline  
Old February 21, 2012, 05:39 PM   #15
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,350
The R&D in bullet technology, these recent dozen or so years, has made the centerfire .22s become far more useful for larger critters. They're no longer limited to "just varmint-sized critters". Even so, I still feel that bigger is better, generally--particularly on angling shots.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old February 22, 2012, 01:03 AM   #16
samsmix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2006
Location: Montana (Montucky?)
Posts: 617
Well said Art. I also second Logan's choice of a fairly tough, heavy-for-caliber bullet. I would, in fact, go heavier still. Dead is, however, dead.
__________________
You'll probably never NEED a gun. I hope you never do. But IF you do, you will need it worse than anything you've ever needed in your life.

IF we're not supposed to eat animals,
howcome God made 'em outta meat?
samsmix is offline  
Old February 22, 2012, 01:54 AM   #17
farmerboy
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,343
I wouldn't hesitate killing a whitetail with a 22-250. Have killed around ten the last three or four years with a 223. All head shots, bullet finds the weakest part of skull and looks like a baseball came out of skull when it exits. Just got a 22-250 about 2 months ago. Got it dialed in on reloads and looking for a varmit or a hog in a day or two.
farmerboy is offline  
Old February 22, 2012, 07:28 AM   #18
phil mcwilliam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2007
Posts: 573
My first centerfire rifle was a Sako 22-250, back around 1980. I live in Australia. I've used my 22-250 successfully on mice, starlings, rats, crows, rabbits, hares, foxes, dingoes, kangaroos, goats, pigs, fallow deer, red deer & waterbuffalo. Back then I didn't have a choice so the 22-250 was used for everything.
I've found the 22-250 a little destructive of anything smaller than hares, & chest shots suitable for dropping animals the size of pigs. Once you start getting into deer sized animals & above you must make surgical precision shots on game in order to humanely kill with a 22-250, & you must be prepared to pass on taking an animal if no shot presents itself.
phil mcwilliam is offline  
Old February 22, 2012, 08:50 AM   #19
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 1,402
We here in the North East are forced to "Bow hunt" with a rifle. I would use a ballistic tip bullet just like in my .223 and never worry about it for deer. West Virginia hunting regulations : a 25 caliber or larger rim fire is legal for deer . What do you think of that next to a 22-250?
Gunplummer is offline  
Old February 22, 2012, 09:21 AM   #20
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,886
well my brother in law takes his 250 out for deer and I use 223(which many consider inferior) for deer so I would say that would be the largest I would feel comfortable with it. as for smallest without vaporizing... a really big rabbit
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the crap people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
Bean counters told me I couldn't fire a man for being in a wheelchair, did it anyway. Ramps are expensive.-Cave Johnson.
tahunua001 is offline  
Old February 22, 2012, 10:37 PM   #21
okiewita40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 11, 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 404
A guy I used to work with grew up and still used a 22-250 until he he was injured in a motorcycle wreck. He said it was was good for whitetail up to about 200 yards. I know he always got his limit of three every year.
__________________
What on god's green earth do you think your doing?
okiewita40 is offline  
Old February 23, 2012, 12:10 PM   #22
spclPatrolGroup
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 349
Oops I was thinking about .22 hornet, not .220 swift, that is what my cousin has started to use along with a 35gr vmax, sure does a nice job of preserving the pelt.
spclPatrolGroup is offline  
Old February 24, 2012, 11:20 AM   #23
RevGeo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 18, 2011
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 154
The 22-250 cartridge with a good bullet is entirely capable of killing deer. Whether the shooter is might be a different story. I'd feel a lot better carrying a 22-250 for deer than a .357Mag pistol. But that's just me, I guess.

My first centerfire was a 22-250 Rem Mod 788 and I used it to shoot everything I hunted back then. Killed several mule deer and lots of coyotes and lots and lots and lots of ground squirrels. My load for everything was a
55gr Speer and 38.0gr of H380 - Bruce Hodgdon's personal load. Nowadays I'd go for one of the heavier premium bullets for deer.
RevGeo is offline  
Old February 24, 2012, 04:54 PM   #24
BIGR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 13, 2000
Location: Mountains
Posts: 1,246
If a .22-250 was all I had, taking deer would be no problem. Heck a .22 LR will take deer if you do your part. I never used a .22 LR or .22-250 on deer, and prefer at least a 30.06 for deer.

I have taken many varmints at long ranges with my .22-250. It is a heck of a varmint round and a tack driver. Use the .22-250 for deer if want, but there are most definitely more forgiving rounds for thick woods hunting.
BIGR is offline  
Old February 25, 2012, 09:05 PM   #25
samsmix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2006
Location: Montana (Montucky?)
Posts: 617
Actually, the .22-250 is not really any more likely to deflect in brush than any thing else. The old "brush-buster" myth is pretty well debunked. But where you have a good point is this: In heavy brush, it is easier to find game that goes down hard, and leaves a lot of spoor. In a stand of from a rest at a stationary whitetail, this does not automatically rule the sub-.25 caliber guns out. But a simple 50 yard broadside running shot can turn into a lost cripple real quick. Again, the key is restraint. A mere .30-30 or .257Roberts will shoot clean through both a leg bone and the vitals. A 55gr fast .22 will do it sometimes, but not every time.
__________________
You'll probably never NEED a gun. I hope you never do. But IF you do, you will need it worse than anything you've ever needed in your life.

IF we're not supposed to eat animals,
howcome God made 'em outta meat?
samsmix is offline  
Reply

Tags
22-250 , 250

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13429 seconds with 7 queries