The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 5, 2011, 03:12 AM   #26
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 1,701
Okay. South dakota, and you said varmints.

first off, I don't like the 22-250. It's actually not good as a multi use cartridge, although many people disagree. Yes, it will kill prairie dogs, coyotes, hogs, and deer, but it's not optimal for deer or hogs, and it really requires a heavy barrel to wring out all of its accuracy. A sport weight 22-250, in my thoughts, is just a waste of FPS and powder. go 223, or heavy barrel specialty rifle.

South dakota? I'm thinking you mean prairie dogs, coyotes, jackrabbit, maybe bobcat, or other small critters. Maybe you intend to go for an antelope or deer someday.

Leave out the .260. Not right for prairie dogs, and even more than you need for other varmints, when a .243 will do in anything coyote or smaller very successfully. .243 with .75 grain match HP or polymer bullets in an accurate sport barrel will do 1" easily with the right loads, and that is prairie dog accuracy out to 200+ yards with a deer capable gun.

You can use the .243 on deer and antelope, although I advise against it.

So, I'd suggest a .243, as it fulfills all of your 50 pounds or smaller animal targets perfectly, and could do larger game as well, but I still suggest that you get a larger rifle to perform larger game hunting separately. If you go two rifles, well, a .260 would be adequate for smaller deer and pronghorn, and could be used for rodents as well, if you choose. a .223 would do for dogs and rabbits, and either one will knock coyotes over like a truck. you have plenty of usage overlap with those two, and better specialized usage as well.
briandg is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 04:45 AM   #27
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 1,399
I had several 6.5's over the years and they are great. I still have a .260 and it is really hard on deer. I don't bother to reload for it, so I have only used 140 grain bullets. The Remington's work great. I never bothered to reload because the magazine well is not long enough for 160 grain bullets. I use 160 grain bullets in my 6.5x55 and it knocks them sideways on a broadside shot. I would think a .260 loaded with 160 grain bullets would be more than enough for even the biggest animal in the deer family.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 08:40 AM   #28
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,334
Mostly varmints? Probably the .22-250. With proper bullets, the .22-250 will work on deer (within my usual self-imposed limits). Nothing wrong with a .243, but for prairie dogs and such, the .22-250 seems preferable.

I certainly wouldn't bother with a .260 for little critters.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 10:19 AM   #29
dahermit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Location: South Central Michigan...near Ohio, Indiana.
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
here's the safe contents, what am I missing?

1. 270
2. 243/heavy barrel
3. 243 sporter
3.7mm-08
4. 22-250
5. 220 swift
6. 223
7 223 wssm
You are missing an accurate count.
__________________
Sometimes you get what you pay for, sometimes you only pay more for what you get.
Three shots are not a "group"...they are a "few".

If the Bible is the literal, infallible, unerring word of God...where are all those witches I am supposed to kill?
dahermit is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 10:31 AM   #30
603Country
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Thornton, Texas
Posts: 2,205
If that list of rifles is what he has inventoried in his gun safe, it appears that the OP doesn't have a need for much of anything gunwise, and particularly not a 243 (two of them) or a 22 centerfire (4 of them). He has a 270, so he really doesn't need a 260. But, being a reloader, he might have a good bit of fun and interest in working with a 260. I enjoy mine.
603Country is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 11:18 AM   #31
ripnbst
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 24, 2010
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,385
22-250. Easy choice.
ripnbst is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 12:05 PM   #32
TX Hunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2010
Location: East Texas USA
Posts: 1,776
I would get the .243 Winchester. I figure that when the other two are obsolite the .243 Winchester will still be on the shelves.
TX Hunter is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 12:15 PM   #33
Archer 9505
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 10, 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 213
Quote:
here's the safe contents, what am I missing?

1. 270
2. 243/heavy barrel
3. 243 sporter
3.7mm-08
4. 22-250
5. 220 swift
6. 223
7 223 wssm
30-06 "The All American"
__________________
NRA Life Member
"An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will"
It's a free country; in a free country, freedom is for more than just those that conform to the accepted.
Archer 9505 is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 06:07 PM   #34
Daryl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
The .243 makes a great varming/deer cartridge. Good range, accurate, and easy to shoot.

The same could be said for the .260.

If deer are in the proposed species to hunt with this gun, I'd have to choose one of the above. Either one would do me just fine, but I already own a .243 so I'd probably choose the .260.

If it's for varmints only, then the 22-250 is the obvious choice for me. I once owned one, 'bout 25 years ago, and it was one very fine varmint/coyote rifle. Had a lot of good times with it, too. One day I'll have another, just because, but right now I get by very well with a .17 Remington.

I even still have the dies to load the '250, and I'll definitely have another one of these days.

Daryl
Daryl is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 10:02 PM   #35
mrbro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 2008
Posts: 195
Varmints? 22-250.
mrbro is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 10:12 PM   #36
Brian Pfleuger
Staff
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Central, Southern NY, USA
Posts: 18,350
I'm a little confused why 243 and 22-250 would even be on the list, since you already have both.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 10:14 PM   #37
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,840
I would get the 243. that's the cartridge I grew up with. I know the best ammunition for the job(for me anyways). I know it's limitations(which are pretty slim besides bullet weight) and I know exactly how comfortable I would be in taking an animal that is either smaller or larger than my targeted demographic.

all of this is based on personal experience mind you. I'm sure a 22-250 and a 260 are all very well suited to pretty much the same tasks but I'm just more familiar with the 243
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the crap people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
Bean counters told me I couldn't fire a man for being in a wheelchair, did it anyway. Ramps are expensive.-Cave Johnson.
tahunua001 is offline  
Old November 5, 2011, 10:58 PM   #38
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 5,604
.260 if you won't let me have a 6.5x55
Buzzcook is offline  
Old November 6, 2011, 09:59 AM   #39
Elkins45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2010
Posts: 361
If you already have a 223 and 220 Swift then you don't really need another varmint round. You have a 270 so you're covered for deer. If that was my collection I would add a 300 magnum of some description for elk/moose just in case I ever got the chance to shoot one. After than I would add something I could shoot cast bullets in like a 358 win or 45/70.

Of the three rounds you mention I would pick the 243 for varmints.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old November 6, 2011, 11:53 AM   #40
BIG P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,569
My 2 cents 260 or 25-06
BIG P is offline  
Old November 6, 2011, 06:24 PM   #41
SDShooter79
Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 77
Ok, here's the dirt

This is going to a a coyote rifle...only. So, I have settled on the 243 and here's why. Yes, I have two other 243's; however, my heavy barrel 243 is a beutiful Savage put together by me strictly for prairie dogs and I don't really want it to get messed up hunting coyotes. My other 243 is a m700 ADL that's about 20 years old. Wood stock, sporter barrel, also a pretty gun that I don't want to get messed, but hunt deer with from time to time. All my other 22's are pretty near and dear to my heart as well accept the 22-250 that I've decided to give to my Dad. The 220 Swift is a number one and again, to beutiful to get beat up. The 223 WSSM is kinda the freak of the safe. Hardly ever gets shot. It's a m70 coyote with a medium barrel and laminate stock. Great performer, just don't know how much barrel life it will have. My 223 is a cheap little savage with composite stock that does a good job but just doesnt have the range a 243 will. So, there it is, it's going to be another 243!

What the platform will be is open for suggestion
SDShooter79 is offline  
Old November 6, 2011, 06:33 PM   #42
jimbob86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 6,702
Quote:
here's the safe contents, what am I missing?

1. 270
2. 243/heavy barrel
3. 243 sporter
3.7mm-08
4. 22-250
5. 220 swift
6. 223
7 223 wssm
You are missing milsurps, Commie guns, hell, you don't even have a 30-06.......

I'd have gone with the .260, myself.

You already have the coyote caliber covered with the Poodle Shooter (.223).
__________________
TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T."

http://nefirearm.com/
jimbob86 is offline  
Old November 6, 2011, 06:47 PM   #43
SDShooter79
Member
 
Join Date: August 20, 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 77
Sorry jimbob, milsurps aren't really my thing. Also, IMHO, a 270 will get the job done on anything I want to hunt in North America. While the 223 is good, I have found that, here on the prairie the 243 rides the wind a little better.
SDShooter79 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11766 seconds with 7 queries