The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 23, 2011, 11:06 PM   #1
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 5,646
Remington 700 question.

A friend is looking at this Model 700

http://salesroom.sunsetauction.com/p...xtnight079.jpg

I haven't had a chance to handle the gun yet, it's supposed to be in very good condition.

It has an aluminum butt plate. That's what I'd like to know about. Did Remington ship model 700s with metal but plates or is this after market?
Buzzcook is offline  
Old October 23, 2011, 11:16 PM   #2
codyb1991
Member
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Location: Hoquiam, WA
Posts: 88
Yes, but you can put limbsaver butt pads on then
codyb1991 is offline  
Old October 23, 2011, 11:52 PM   #3
jimbob86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 7,109
Barrel seems short..... 20"?
__________________
TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T."

http://nefirearm.com/
jimbob86 is offline  
Old October 24, 2011, 12:04 AM   #4
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 1,847
Blind magazine adl with pressed checkering and pot metal butt plate with sloppy stain and finish overrun on the metal. I'm placing this in early 70s. Yes, I think it's factory. That is the same plate, I think, that was previously used, at one point they went to plastic with white spacer, and recently they've gone with metal, pads, or plastic.

That's a nice enough gun. I'd own it. I'd rather have an ordinary piece of wood like that than have to look at plastic.

I hate plastic.
briandg is offline  
Old October 24, 2011, 01:41 AM   #5
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,530
Remington used the aluminum buttplates from the 1960s to early/mid 1970s.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old October 24, 2011, 02:41 AM   #6
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 1,847
even earlier, i think. I have a 1950s model, appr, that has the aluminum plate. Looks almost identical, completely down to the dripped and scraped varnish.

What's your take on the checkering? Look pressed to you? What was that, very late 60s until the late 70d/80s?

I'm sticking with somewhere between 70 and 74, based on what I see.
briandg is offline  
Old October 24, 2011, 10:26 AM   #7
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,530
Quote:
even earlier, i think. I have a 1950s model, appr, that has the aluminum plate.
Not to start a war, but the Rem 700 was introduced in 1963. The 721/722 were the 1950s rifles.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old October 24, 2011, 03:17 PM   #8
oneoldsap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: I live in the foot of the Green Mountains of Vermont
Posts: 1,590
If it was built in 62-64 the 20" barrel is correct , as is the aluminum buttplate on non magnum 700s ! Oh and the 700 was introduced in 1962 along with the 7 Mag. .
oneoldsap is offline  
Old October 24, 2011, 04:07 PM   #9
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 5,646
Thanks for satisfying my curiosity. The only other 700s I've dealt with had plastic plates, or they were covered with pads.

22" barrel and it's in .308. I'll probably get a look Wednesday or so.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old October 24, 2011, 09:19 PM   #10
4V50 Gary
Staff
 
Join Date: November 2, 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,045
The older guns were drilled and tapped on the side of the receiver for receiver sights. This extra work was discarded with the newer guns. Sorry but I forgot the year Remington did this as a cost savings measure.
__________________
Vigilantibus et non dormientibus jura subveniunt. Molon Labe!
4V50 Gary is offline  
Old October 25, 2011, 09:45 AM   #11
tobnpr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 3,204
Nothing wrong with 20"-22" barrels. Unless you're a competition, long range benchrest shooter, or long-range hunter, longer barrels just aren't necessary.
I used to think that there was a huge cost to velocity with shorter barrels, but that old-school line of thinking just doesn't seem to hold up to reality.

Quote:
During the development of the Tango 51, Tac Ops took a standard 26-inch barrel and cut it down to 18 inches in one-inch increments. Between 10 to 20 rounds were fired at each invrement. They found that a 20-inch barrel provides for a complete propellant burn and no velocity loss when using Federal Match 168-grain BTHP, a cartridge that has become something of a law enforcement standard. Going to an 18-inch barrel only resulted in a loss of 32 feet per second (fps).
http://www.tacticaloperations.com/SWATbarrel/
tobnpr is online now  
Old October 25, 2011, 11:02 AM   #12
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 1,847
in spite of all of the conventional knowledge, in most cases with anything but the slowest possible propellants, every inch of barrel loss from a standard 22-24" barrel is pretty insignificant, as are the gains.

But that's my opinion. Some people here may find a 50-200 FPS velocity loss with a couple inches of lenght reduction to be a real problem.
briandg is offline  
Old October 25, 2011, 11:21 AM   #13
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,544
Just for information purposes, this is the difference between a 24, 22, and 20 inch barrel for the 308 Rem 180 grn Core lock out of a remington 700.

24 2722 fps
22 2713 fps
20 2677 fps

This is from my granddaughters science project where she cut down a 26 in barrel from 26 to 16, two inches at a time.

In a 308 you don't really need the longer barrel. Where it comes in handy is with the longer sight radius you get when using iron sights.

Another example is the M14. It has a 22 inch barrel and has done very well at Service Rifle 1000 yard matches.

With the M14 and its flash hider, using M118 ammo, there is no detectable muzzle flash when fired at night. (I know, I would have lost money on this if I would have bet the first time I saw it.

If the price is right that would be a good all around rifle. If I bought it, and intended on keeping the iron sights, I would go to a reciever sights, again because of the longer sight radius.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old October 25, 2011, 09:38 PM   #14
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 5,646
The .308 was designed to replicate .30-06 performance with a smaller case and out of shorter barrels.

Well I got to handle the rifle and it's in 99% condition. Who ever owned it either treated it very well, didn't shoot it hardly at all, or some combination there of.

It is a 22" barrel as advertised. The gun is light and very handy.

Not sure about the age. The serial# is 273xxx. I didn't see any letters that the inter-tubes tells me should be there to date it.

I told my friend he should expect from $450 to $550. Does that sound about right?
Buzzcook is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09637 seconds with 9 queries