The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 6, 2012, 11:49 PM   #1
theloco71
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2012
Posts: 1
Colt Frame with Remington Rand Slide

Hello everyone, I just got this M1911A1 apparently from the WWII. After I got it (for a good price) I dug into it, and found some irregularities with it. The frame appears to be a Colt from 1942 o 1943, and the Slide is definitively a Remington Rand.

The funny part about it id that the serial number is almost erased and there is a "104" stamped over the original serial number. On the first place I thought that someone down the road alterated the numbers on purpose, but after doing some research I found out that my gun could be a "Rebuild".

The funny part about it is that I can't find any Depot or Armory stampings regarding the rebuild, unless the "104" is actually the rebuild stamping.

So here I am, with the experts. I attached some pics...

Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CR Proofmarks.jpg (239.0 KB, 86 views)
File Type: jpg CR SNdetail.jpg (228.6 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg CRframe top.jpg (163.7 KB, 76 views)
theloco71 is offline  
Old March 7, 2012, 02:36 AM   #2
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 6,836
When military 1911 pistols were rebuilt, serial numbers were NOT erased and a different number stamped.
When a 1911 was rebuilt, the arsenal doing the rebuild stamped a mark on the left side of the frame, indicating the arsenal that did the work.
As example, Augusta Arsenal rebuilds are stamped with an "AA" mark, Red River would be "RRA" etc.
They DID NOT alter or erase original serial numbers.

The reason the numbers were defaced is almost certainly because the gun was stolen from the military and someone thought erasing the serial number would prevent it being detected as stolen. Why someone then stamped another number on it is a mystery.

What you have is an ILLEGAL GUN. Federal law states in no uncertain terms that a firearm that's had the serial number defaced or altered is a FELONY crime to possess.
This is no BS. This is a felony in every state and under Federal law.
What you can do is request the BATF to issue a new serial number and have it stamped on the frame to make it legal again.
This is even easier if you can still determine what the original number was.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old March 7, 2012, 10:49 PM   #3
radom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2000
Posts: 1,298
More common than most think as in the past the govt property markings tended to worry folks so they would deface the SN on the things and was totaly legal at the time. As its a pre 1968 gun and need not even have a SN and does have a number stamped over the old one I would not sweat it. Before 1968 you could grind a SN off and stamp piggy faces in place and it was totaly legal.
radom is offline  
Old March 7, 2012, 11:33 PM   #4
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 19,858
Sorry, Radom, but you are wrong. The 1968 law required new guns to have serial numbers, but the law banning removal or alteration of existing serial numbers dates to 1938, so obliterating the serial number on that gun was not "legal at the time" no matter what "piggy faces" it was replaced with. The gun, unfortunately, is contraband and illegal to possess.

The "104" is spurious and was probably applied so the seller could claim that he thought that was the serial number and didn't know the original serial had been removed.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old March 7, 2012, 11:38 PM   #5
radom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2000
Posts: 1,298
1938? hmmm I missed that one for some reasion. I was under the assumption that the only laws that delt with that was early 30s deal and 1968 so learn somthing all the time I guess.
radom is offline  
Old March 8, 2012, 06:48 PM   #6
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 6,836
The laws are, that any firearm that ORIGINALLY HAD a serial number is a felony to possess if the number is defaced or altered.

That means that if you have a 1900 Colt New Army & Navy revolver and the number was defaced...... it's illegal.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old March 8, 2012, 07:41 PM   #7
the rifleer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2008
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,260
Quote:
What you have is an ILLEGAL GUN. Federal law states in no uncertain terms that a firearm that's had the serial number defaced or altered is a FELONY crime to possess.
If that is true then how do you explain all the mosin nagants out there that have parts that are force matched to make the serial numbers match? If what you are saying is true, there are probably illegal guns sold everyday by licensed FFL dealers to legal citizens.
__________________
There is no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people.
the rifleer is offline  
Old March 8, 2012, 09:51 PM   #8
Willie Sutton
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Posts: 1,066
Guys... the serial number on this one is still visible under the second number. The OP said "almost erased. Looks to me like it was way overpolished, not deliberately defaced. It is still legible... and legal.

Give the poor guy a break, not a heart attack. Could be anything... my educated guess is that it's a foregn military arsenal rework, not a US rework. Greece? Turkey? Korea? Could be any of them. The number is a rack-number. Nobody would try to pass off a 3 digit number as a serial number.

Back to the OP: It's a mismatched parts gun, not that uncommon to see. It's a shooter, not a collector. You might very well trade out that slide to someone else and find a Colt slide for it, should be a fun and easy gunshow project to see and swap with any of the parts dealers that specialize in .45 parts.


Willie

.

Last edited by Willie Sutton; March 8, 2012 at 10:00 PM.
Willie Sutton is offline  
Old March 8, 2012, 11:17 PM   #9
the rifleer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2008
Location: Sunny California
Posts: 1,260
Or leave it as is and have fun with it...
__________________
There is no such thing as a stupid question, only stupid people.
the rifleer is offline  
Old March 8, 2012, 11:23 PM   #10
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 11,750
Quote:
If that is true then how do you explain all the mosin nagants out there that have parts that are force matched to make the serial numbers match? If what you are saying is true, there are probably illegal guns sold everyday by licensed FFL dealers to legal citizens.
NO, thats not quite right. There in only one number recognized as the serial number in common US practice (and I believe, in law), and that number must be on the action/receiver/frame of the gun. All the other numbers stamped on the other parts are nothing, from a legal point of view.

Your gun may be 12345, and have 45 or 345 stamped on half the parts. The serial # is 12345, stamped on the receiver. IT may have 45 on half the parts and 27 on two of the parts. It may have all different numbers on all the parts. This matters only to collectors. The legal serial# is still 12345...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old March 9, 2012, 06:27 AM   #11
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 5,229
I think the point of the Mosin Nagants is that M-N receivers were never numbered to begin with. Serial numbers are applied on receivers to comply with BATF regs and U.S. Customs law.
gyvel is offline  
Old March 11, 2012, 06:21 PM   #12
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 19,858
FWIW, the National Firearms Act, which regulated automatic weapons, short barrel shotguns and rifles, and silencers, dates to 1934. The Federal Firearms Act, which regulates ordinary firearms and established the whole Federal gun control system, with licensing for dealers, etc., was signed into law by FDR on 30 June 1938. The two were modified and combined into the Gun Contol Act of 1968. The ban on removing or altering serial numbers on ordinary gun was/is in the FFA.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old April 7, 2012, 02:53 PM   #13
atlantadad
Member
 
Join Date: March 21, 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 34
1911

I might be interested in the slide - looking for one for a late model RR.
atlantadad is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 01:25 PM   #14
Hardcase
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
Practically speaking, it appears that the ATF is not particularly concerned about "old" firearms with long ago defaced serial numbers. I had the same situation with a Colt New Army/Navy that's been in the family for decades. Sometime in the dusty past, somebody filed the numbers off the butt.

I called the local ATF office about it when I inherited the gun. The agent explained that in the hierarchy of people they're concerned about, the guy with grandpa's eighty or hundred year old pistol rates slightly below "who's gonna take the trash out this afternoon".

Now, you'll have to discover your own definition of "old" and "long ago". In my case, I'm not worried at all. Your comfort level may vary.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae
Hardcase is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 06:23 PM   #15
Avenger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Posts: 273
Another problem with Mosins is that the ATF doesn't recognize Cyrillic lettering.
Avenger is offline  
Old April 10, 2012, 06:24 PM   #16
Chris_B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 2,841
That sounds about right, but you know, the caveat there is that the phrase "right now" should be in the agent's explanation:

"the hierarchy of people they're concerned about right now, the guy with grandpa's eighty or hundred year old pistol rates slightly below "who's gonna take the trash out this afternoon"

The agent you talked to is a good common-sense guy, it seems. But his verbal isn't ATF policy or the law, after all.

When I was fooling with muscle cars, after a big show one day, a home town cop ordered me to do a burnout. If his boss saw me doing that, no amount of "but that officer said" would have been good enough.

(Yes, I did as ordered)
Chris_B is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 11:31 AM   #17
emcon5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 1999
Location: High Desert NV
Posts: 1,675
Quote:
Another problem with Mosins is that the ATF doesn't recognize Cyrillic lettering.
That and there is no original serial number on the action of a Mosin Nagant. The Soviet S/N is on the barrel.

You will notice all the importer applied S/Ns are on the action.
emcon5 is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 11:50 AM   #18
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,515
My 1911a1 has a Colt slide and a Union Switch and Single slide.

I've been around 1911s a long time. It was common in the military for parts to be switched between guns. That is the way the 1911/1911a1 was designed. I wouldn't let it bother me.

I'm more bothered by those who say the "parts are correct".

__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 02:18 PM   #19
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 11,300
I'm sure Hardcase and his contact are right, there is little interest in tracking down all the pilfered guns with erased or altered serial numbers so as to hassle a veteran's descendants... Now.

But it is still not legal and one of these days, they might change their mind.
Even written policy position from BATF (or IRS) can be changed the next day and nothing you can do about it.

Or they might investigate you or the seller for some other suspected violation and use that as a "piling on" accusation.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 02:32 PM   #20
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 11,750
As to old guns with defaced serial #s, there is a legal process for re-applying a serial number.

Generally speaking (and at this time, it could change) if you say "I have this, and I think it's not legal.." they will allow you to work the system to make it legal, without pressing charges. Sometimes there's no way, and the gun is forfeit, but again, usually without any charges, since its is obvious that by asking for help you have no criminal intent.

HOWEVER, the law is the law, as written, and they can charge you for posessing a gun with a defaced serial #, if they want to. It doesn't matter to the law who, when, or how the number got defaced.

I worked as a Small Arms repairman for the Army back in the 70s, and I can tell you from personal experience that in the shop, "parts is parts". One single gun being worked on always got the original parts put back in (as long as they were servicable). Two or three guns might get all the original parts back on the original frame, but there was no guarantee.

One maker's frame and another's slide mattered not at all to us. Neither did any accuracy standards. Barrels were checked for erosion, but that's all. Wear on parts only mattered if the gun failed to pass its final function check.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old April 11, 2012, 07:34 PM   #21
Chris_B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 2,841
Respectfully Kraig, the issue as I see it is not the fact that the slide and frame are not original to each other. The issue is the serial number on the frame having been changed
Chris_B is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13291 seconds with 11 queries