The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 12, 2011, 12:31 PM   #1
Col. Mosby
Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, Va.
Posts: 49
M-1 Carbine Bolt Question

I have a Underwood carbine that has the round M-2 bolt in it. May I replace the round bolt with a complete flat style bolt without affecting the headspace? How is the head space determined on the carbine? Thanks for any and all help.
Larry
Col. Mosby is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 01:31 PM   #2
dlb435
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Posts: 654
Since the M1 is a blow back opperated carbine, you should be able to do this with no problem. FYI - the M2 bolt was supplied as a field drop in replacement part with no gun smithing required. Don't see why you can't go the other way. The M2 bolt will work just as well as the M1 bolt. I don't see much reason to change it.
dlb435 is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 01:58 PM   #3
Col. Mosby
Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, Va.
Posts: 49
M-1 Carbine Bolt Question

Thanks for the info. I was entertaining the thought of putting the carbine back to it's original configuration. Do you happen to know when the M-2 bolts first started to be used?
Larry
Col. Mosby is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 03:49 PM   #4
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,991
The bolts can normally be dropped in if the chamber and receiver are within spec, but that should be verified, IMHO. They are not, however, blowback operated, as most .22 rimfire semi-auto systems are, for example. The M1 bolts are gas-operated rotating bolt actions, operated by a short-stroke gas piston system, usually called a tappet and slide system.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Patron Member

Last edited by Unclenick; February 12, 2011 at 03:59 PM.
Unclenick is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 03:53 PM   #5
junkman_01
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 260
Whoa! The M1 carbine is NOT a blow back design. It is an air cooled, locked breach, magazine fed rifle. Headspace needs to be checked if swapping bolts. This is done with go/no-go gages. This rifle develops 46412 psi chamber pressure. Nothing to fool with and be wrong!
junkman_01 is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 04:11 PM   #6
dlb435
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Posts: 654
Sorry, you're right about the breach lock but the pressure is a bit high. More like 36,000. It doesn't have much more power than a 357 magnum.
dlb435 is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 04:26 PM   #7
junkman_01
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 260
That chamber pressure figure I quoted is from my QuickLoad software and is the MAXIMUM for the cartridge. Most loads are 35-40000 psi.

In late 1943, Inland experimented with a fully round bolt for the M1 carbine. The round bolt design proved successful and was adopted for the M1 carbine in March 1944. These are considered Type III bolts. M2 carbines were a development of the Korean war, but the round bolts were used in WWII in M1 carbines.

Last edited by junkman_01; February 12, 2011 at 04:33 PM.
junkman_01 is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 07:29 PM   #8
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 18,644
Round bolts were adopted as easier to manufacture and also because there had been some cracked bolts of the earlier type reported. The round bolt was standard for the M2, but was used in original production and as a replacement bolt in both M1 and M2 carbines.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 07:39 PM   #9
Dfariswheel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2001
Posts: 6,773
The key point here is that M1 Carbine bolts, like virtually all rifle bolts DO NOT just drop in with no safety check.
They need to be checked for proper head space.

This was true in WWII when they were new, and it even more true today more than 60 years later when the rifles and bolts are all used and have worn.
Dfariswheel is offline  
Old February 12, 2011, 08:16 PM   #10
Col. Mosby
Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2011
Location: Fredericksburg, Va.
Posts: 49
M-1 Carbine Bolt Question

Thanks to all for their imput. My Underwood has the round bolt and shoots like a champ as it is. Like they say, "if it aint broke don't fix it". I just wanted to have my carbine to be in proper WWII configuration. It appears that it is. Thanks again to all for helping this novice.
Larry
Col. Mosby is offline  
Old February 13, 2011, 10:56 AM   #11
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,991
Junkman01,

Note that because QuickLOAD was developed in Germany, the default maximums are CIP rather than SAAMI specs except where (SAAMI) appears in parentheses or U.S. Military specs. That's how the .30 Carbine has a nice even 3200 bar or 320 MPa maximum pressure in QuickLOAD (depending which units you chose) and has all those odd trailing digits. SAAMI specs for Maximumum Average Pressure (MAP) are always rounded to the nearest 500 psi.

Note that the military and the CIP both reported copper crusher results as PSI up into the mid-90's, rather than segregating them into CUP and PSI as SAAMI did. This causes a lot of confusion. Many people still believe commercial .308 is hotter than military 7.62 because of that, when they are actually the same if measured in the same test apparatus.

In the case of the .30 Carbine, it's pressures run in the range over which copper crushers sometimes report close to or even higher results than Piezo transducers do, give or take 2,000 to 5,000 thousand PSI. This is an artifact of the measuring systems having an irregular relationship such that math conversions from one to the other cannot be relied on not to change the real pressure limits. Fortunately for us, guns are pretty tough and tend to withstand the irregularities.


.30 Carbine Maximum Average Pressure (peak)

CIP MAP = 320 MPa = 46,212 PSI
SAAMI MAPs = 40,000 PSI and 40,000 CUP (old)
Military MAP = 40,000 PSI (actually CUP reported as PSI)
Military Proof Load (Blue Pill) = 47,500 PSI (actually CUP reported as PSI)


The CIP spec used to match the military spec pretty well when the CIP still used copper crushers, too. At that time it was 280 MPa or about 40,600 PSI. If I do my own trend analysis of MAPs, the expected change would have been to about 43,000 PSI or 295 MPa (2950 bar) going from crusher to Piezo transducer, but CIP typically just uses a fixed multiplier in switching from copper crushers to Piezo transducer numbers, and that's not always realistic. There's just too much noise in the relationship. For that reason I tend to trust the SAAMI numbers more. There are other complications in that the CIP Piezo transducer ports aren't located in the same position as SAAMI test devices are. This can fudge the numbers another couple thousand PSI.

Unfortunately, only measuring military reference loads designed to produce the exact correct MAP, and doing it with both SAAMI and CIP Piezo pressure test rigs could resolve this. I wish I had the gear available, but don't.

I expect that makes it all as clear as mud. Here's a place with some SAAMI and CIP pressures listed, though the CIP numbers are rounded PSI numbers in this table.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Patron Member

Last edited by Unclenick; February 13, 2011 at 10:59 AM. Reason: Added link
Unclenick is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08376 seconds with 7 queries