The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 8, 2011, 12:17 AM   #1
Ben Towe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,120
Colt's and "six up" carry

Can anyone explain to me why exactly carrying six rounds on half cock is considered so unsafe? Is this a modern "age of safety" notion or was it practiced in antiquity? I know some lever rifles with half cock safeties are considered safe so why not a Colt revolver? It may seem ignorant but I've always owned New Model Rugers until I bought my Walker replica.
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs
Ben Towe is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 12:45 AM   #2
Ideal Tool
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 6, 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,080
It was practised back in the day (19th century) Elmer keith also mentioned this and he was refering to the early 1900's.
Ideal Tool is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 01:12 AM   #3
kameron454ci
Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2011
Location: Montague. MI
Posts: 85
I like my right leg/foot so i carry five. i think if you just bump the hammer back when on half cock it will fall.
kameron454ci is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 02:59 AM   #4
Ben Towe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,120
Kameron454ci, if the half cock mechanism is the same on all Colts as on my 1847 (and it could very well be different) then the hammer will not pass forward of half cock without pulling the trigger.
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs
Ben Towe is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 07:45 AM   #5
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,760
Because sears are hardened, and thus brittle, metal and they are breakable. All it takes is a sharp blow to the tip of the hammer, like dropping the gun. And once the sear breaks, nothing stops the hammer from falling. There's also the problem of a worn sear or notch - it is possible for a hammer to slip past the half cock notch if the sear and/or the notch are badly worn, a condition the owner would not necessarily be aware of.

Not all guns are nice and new from the factory. Assuming all guns work like they did when they were new is not a good idea. The half cock position is not a safety. It's better than full cock or hammer down on a loaded chamber, but not as good as hammer down on an empty chamber. And most folks prefer a full measure of safety over a partial measure. Not all, sadly, but most.
mykeal is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 08:31 AM   #6
Ben Towe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,120
Mykeal, thank you. Best explanation I've heard.
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs
Ben Towe is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 09:38 AM   #7
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 4,598
Ben

Interesting characterization your use of the phrase "modern age of safety".

I am inclined to agree with you to a point. And as nearly everyone on the forum knows, this is a hot btton with me.

Many of the safety requirements identified in industry are more like realizations of a danger which always existed but was never mitigated. As an example, I cite the requirement for climber safety devices now in occupations which formerly did not make use of them. There are probably a hundred thousand examples of this enlightened approach to safety. As much as I hate to admit it, OSHA, NIOSH, and the guidance they develop and implement do save lives and reduce illness and injury.

I do believe it is possible to be too safe. When a requirement is set forth that is difficult, costly, or monumentally inconvenient to implement and which does not actually provide an appreciable gain in safety we may be going too far.

Many people would consider my approach to safety (the fact that I believe it is possible to be too safe.) as sacrelige. I did 26 years in the Navy and safety was part and parcel of every Navy evolution. After leaving the service I became an OSHA instructor, A CSX Railroad Work Safety instructor, and a Red Cross CPR/First Aid instructor. So it may surprise you to learn that I hate fire extinguishers. I experienced three shipboard fires and not one of them was put out with a fire bottle, but in every case all of the fire bottles were emptied without effect on the fire. In the fire on USS Coyningham, they used up every fire bottle on the ship, all of the ones they could get from adjacent ships and still the extinguishers had no effect. One man killed, three seriously burned, and many mistakenly thought they could fight a fire with a fire extinguisher. 20 seconds is all you get.

I also load directly from a flask into a previously fired revolver. I know that many among you think this is dangerous and I do not disagree. But I understand the danger and know how to reduce it to an acceptable (to me) level. If you read about me in the news paper, you will know that I was mistaken. It would not be the first time.

I always load all six but then the way I shoot does not make that practice any more dangerous than loading five. I never ever shoot with other people. I never carry the loaded revolver more than about eight feet. I always load and then discharge the rounds immediately. I ALWAYS cap the nipples at the shooting bench and NEVER travel even three steps with the revolver once it hasbeen capped. I must tell that the revolver on half cock, with the hammer just three quarters of an inch away from a live chamber send chills up my spine.
__________________
Doc

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government. Thomas Jefferson
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 09:56 AM   #8
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,871
Most cap and ball revolvers well have one or more pins or notches to locate the hammer down between chambers. Some C&B revolvers, like the Starr uses a extra set of bolt notches cut in the cylinder as a safety device. I consider this a safe way to carry a C&B.

Ben Towe, your Walker replica should have a single pin on the back of the cylinder to locate the hammer between cylinders. The Walker and Whitneyville Dragoons used a single pin and six pins starting some time in 1st model dragoons.

A center fire SA without the transfer bar should have the hammer resting on a empty chamber.


Quote:
Originally Posted by GunDoc
I also load directly from a flask into a previously fired revolver. I know that many among you think this is dangerous and I do not disagree. But I understand the danger and know how to reduce it to an acceptable (to me) level. If you read about me in the news paper, you will know that I was mistaken. It would not be the first time.
I agree Doc. I just can't see "glowing embers" lasting so long as to be a hazard when reloading a C&B. Now if I was using paper cartridges I would be more cautious.

Last edited by madcratebuilder; February 8, 2011 at 10:02 AM.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 10:33 AM   #9
Hardcase
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
I'm with Mykeal 100%. And with Doc, too, except that I don't always practice what I preach. I'll get it straight one of these days.

Interesting point, Doc, about the main space fire on Gus. We talked about that fire and its fallout on my ship, particularly why that officer died. Oh, and about the wisdom of aluminum fixtures on the DC deck (given that my ship had an aluminum superstructure, it seemed important...) I was in the process of getting ESWS qualified, so I was paying a lot of attention.

Sorry, didn't mean to derail the thread.
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae
Hardcase is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 01:22 PM   #10
rdstrain49
Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2010
Location: Black Hills / South Dakota
Posts: 65
load 6 on the range if you wish, but 5 on your belt.
rdstrain49 is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 01:33 PM   #11
Model-P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 727
Quote:
I know some lever rifles with half cock safeties are considered safe so why not a Colt revolver?
If you ever get a chance to compare the hammer and trigger sears of a single action revolver hammer and a lever action rifle hammer you will see the difference right away. The rifle sears are much more substantial.

Also, a handgun hitting the gound is much more likely to be pointing at you than a long rifle would under the same circumstances.

BTW, even the half cock safety on a lever action rifle is not foolproof. They can also break under the right (wrong) circumstances.
Model-P is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 01:41 PM   #12
bighead46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2010
Posts: 140
The half cock notch is undercut and normally carrying it that way isn't much different than a percussion lock muzzle loader being carried around on half cock. I think the big danger is that with a rifle you have less of a chance of brushing the hammer against an object that could slightly pull back the hammer and let it accidentally fire. Such an occurrence would be a lot more likely with a revolver being carried in a loose fitting holster, PLUS the revolver is aimed at your leg. In any event the time honored carry on a SAA Colt is five with the hammer down on an empty chamber. It is historically correct. At the range go ahead and load six.
bighead46 is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 01:48 PM   #13
Ben Towe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,120
Madcratebuilder, I found that pin. That little guy is hard to see, and the fact that they don't come with much of an instruction manual to tell you things like that doesn't help.

I think that safety has gotten a little out of hand in some instances, I just didn't know if this was such a case. Apparently not.
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs
Ben Towe is offline  
Old February 8, 2011, 03:10 PM   #14
SIGSHR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2005
Posts: 3,095
From what I have read over the years the main function of a half cock was to keep the revolver from firing in case the shooter's hand slipped while drawing to full cock, and also to disengage the cylinder during loading. It is really not a safety as we think of if.
SIGSHR is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 08:25 AM   #15
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,871
Quote:
If you ever get a chance to compare the hammer and trigger sears of a single action revolver hammer and a lever action rifle hammer you will see the difference right away. The rifle sears are much more substantial.
The sear ledge on Enfields, Swiss k31's, and Mausers is much smaller than a typical SA Colt. The sear on a AR10/15 and Marlin 336 is about the same size as a SA Colt, or DA Ruger, S&W, Charter Arms....
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 10:06 AM   #16
Hardcase
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Sunny Southern Idaho
Posts: 1,909
MCB, I don't think that any of those rifles use half cock for a safety
__________________
Well we don't rent pigs and I figure it's better to say it right out front because a man that does like to rent pigs is... he's hard to stop - Gus McCrae
Hardcase is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 11:29 AM   #17
bighead46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2010
Posts: 140
Not to keep repeating myself, and...I'm far from ever being accused of being a safety nut, but...I've NEVER heard of a Colt SAA being carried in a half cock position. The only advanatge you would be gaining is a sixth shot. As most gun fights go; if you haven't hit the other guy by the fifth shot you are probably in big trouble anyway.
bighead46 is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 11:37 AM   #18
junkman_01
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 260
Quote:
As most gun fights go; if you haven't hit the other guy by the fifth shot you are probably in big trouble anyway.
But what 'IF' you have to engage multiple adversaries? That sixth shot just might be the one that saves your life!
junkman_01 is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 12:00 PM   #19
Model-P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 727
Quote:
I've NEVER heard of a Colt SAA being carried in a half cock position.
Neither have I. But the op didn't mention SAAs. He was referring to cap-and-ball revolvers. Even though he didn't specifically say so in his first post, I assumed as much.

Others went on to mention the SAA, and just went with the discussion of sear design in general, the quarter cock and half cock sears being essentially the same in construction and strength. I suspect we all know that on a SAA it is the quarter cock notch that is/was used as a "safety".
Model-P is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 01:44 PM   #20
Ben Towe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,120
Well I was talking about Colt revolvers in general, be they cap and ball or SAA. The 1847 just happens to be the first "Colt" I've ever owned.
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs
Ben Towe is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 02:43 PM   #21
Fiv3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2010
Posts: 273
I don't trust the safety notches or the pins on C&B revolvers enough to rely on them. I don't see them as UN-safe. However, I know that it is really easy to thumb back the hammer accidentally just enough that the cylinder rotates so that the hammer is now resting on a live cap Shooting at the range I load all six. I might even load all six and cap them if I am driving right to the range to shoot. I'm not scared of a revolver holding 6 up, but I don't like carrying that way.

What I do if I am carrying a cap and ball where I want to keep 6 loaded but fairly safe, I rest the hammer on the safety notch and leave the cap off the first nipple the gun will rotate to if the hammer is slightly cocked. I still have the powder, wad, and ball in there, just no way to set it off. This gives me 5 for sure and a 6th if I deem I need it. Sure it's slow to cap a nipple in a crisis, but it's a hellova lot easier than loading power and ball AND a nipple in a crisis

Generally speaking, my BP guns are just fun range toys. For defensive purposes, I have much better arms. However, I do sometime carry a smoke wagon with me out in the woods for fun. The 1847 is next on my list. I hope to have one before there are buds on the trees
Fiv3 is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 02:56 PM   #22
Ben Towe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,120
Um... an uncapped, charged cylinder is begging for a chain fire! I can't say this is a good idea.

As far as for personal defense I doubt I'll ever carry the Walker. It is far too large to even attempt to conceal and weighs as much as some rifles. My question was more out of curiousity than any intent to use it for defensive purposes.
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs

Last edited by Ben Towe; February 9, 2011 at 03:04 PM.
Ben Towe is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 05:24 PM   #23
Fiv3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2010
Posts: 273
opps I forgot to mention my little plastic booty that I keep over the nipple Sorry. Yes, an uncapped nipple COULD result in a chainfire. I get these little electrical connector pieces at work. They ship them with these little protective booties that are just about perfect for slipping over revolver nipples. They are just deep enough to seal the flash hole yet long enough to give me a little nub of a purchase to pull off. As a matter of fact, they might be nice for humid days when you want to load up the gun but keep it uncapped until you are ready to fire it. I haven't tried that just yet, but it MIGHT work

I have about 100 of them, so if I ever need to pull on off and toss it...no big deal

Thanks for pointing out that part, Ben.
Fiv3 is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 05:43 PM   #24
Ben Towe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,120
That makes me feel much better, lol.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
__________________
'Merica: Back to back World War Champs
Ben Towe is offline  
Old February 9, 2011, 06:27 PM   #25
bighead46
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 8, 2010
Posts: 140
Cap and ball? Oh boy- we had a big discussion on that a while back. I was in the minority as far as carrying those loaded with 6 chambers but there was such an uproar that I decided even on a percussion only load 5 and have the hammer on an empty cylinder.
BUT, just to be a (&*%^&* I'll say that a few percussion revolvers have good pins or deep cuts that OUGHT TO make carrying six okay except if you catch the spur of the hammer on something, etc. In any event, I'll go along with the crowd and say load just five.
They say the average gun fight is at 7 yards, I've had two home invasions and both times there were multiple guys- 2 once and 5 on the second. I'm not sure if a 6th round would make all the difference if the shooting started. Dive for cover.
bighead46 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12832 seconds with 7 queries