![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
|
1975 Citori Fixed Choke Barrel Numbers...Mean?
I have a 1 and a 3 marked on either barrel of my 1975 citori. I believe 3 is modified (from other posts), but can't seem to find any other information of this.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
|
Here's a chart showing choke markings. Browning uses a * system
http://www.hallowellco.com/choke_chart.htm |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,682
|
Do you have any asterisk's on the barrels? Usually Browning marks the barrels with a number of asterisk's and a dot or "$" symbol. The combination denotes the barrel's choke.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
|
Nope, I've got an actual 1 stamped on the top barrel, and a 3 stamped on the bottom barrel. It's a 1975 model 12 gauge citori.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2006
Posts: 202
|
i have one of those,,i think i bought it in the summer of "75" it is choked improved and modified,,, and the designation is **- and **
IIRC those marks are on the left side of the barrels at the chamber,,visible when you break the gun open my .02 ocharry
__________________
YHS ocharry |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
|
yes, marked on the left side of the barrel. however, only visible when the fore stock is removed. A "1" on the top barrel, and a "3" on the bottom barrel. This is the 28" special steel barrel that shoots 3" shells.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,281
|
My guess is full over modified -- a fairly common combination. The tighter chock for the longer second shot. I could be a simple as the folks making the guns for Browning didn't have any asterisk stamps in the early days.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
|
That's my guess, but I wanted to know for sure. I would like to see what the breakdown of each number is. I've heard of a 3 and 5 barrel also with uncertainty as to what the chokes were there as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
|
If you open that chart I linked to, you will see most of the various choke markings used by a variety of companies
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
|
yea, i read through it. However that states a skeet and improved, and I've heard from several folks that the 3 is a modified. I appreciate everyone's input....still looking for a browning specific chart if anyone has one, or a link to one.
thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Staff
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 10,691
|
Or you could just measure the bore at the muzzle with a vermeer caliper?
Brent
__________________
Finally have designs going up in the Hogdogs Outdoor Apparel online store. http://www.cafepress.com/hogdogsoutdoorapparel Thanks for lookin'... |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
|
Measuring the bores and then the chokes is the second best way.
Patterning your gun is the BEST way - it doesn't matter what the barrel says - it matters what your barrels do with the loads you are shooting through it |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,281
|
Quote:
A gun maker can chose to label his chokes in two ways: consider cylinder bore as his start (Perazzi marks cylinder bore with an O and full with a 9), or use your tightest choke as your start (Browning typical uses one star for full and three for cylinder, or, in the case of the early Citori, a number 1 instead of one star). Other makers stamp the actual diameter of the choke like 18.4 (in mm's). Traditional UK makers may mark chokes in quarters (0/4=cyl; 1/4=imp cyl; 2/4=mod; 3/4=imp mod and 4/4=full). USofA makers typically just spell out the choke markings. It you find an old Winchester with "FULL" marked on the barrel, there's no questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2006
Posts: 202
|
toolmankan, my old Citori is the field model,,26",3"chambers,12 gauge and I am pretty sure i got it in the late spring or early summer of 75,, all those years ago,,IIRC,,seems I recall it was in the $230-250 price range I gave for it. It will go to my grandson one of these days and I am sure it will last his lifetime too!!
I am curious to your markings and maybe you have a transition model?? Didn't browning make that change over somewhere in late 73 to early 74?? From Belgian to Japan?? As for the quality of the Japanese guns,,the one I have has been used a lot,,still tight,,never had a problem,,I've used it for everything,,lol Good luck figuring this out ,,if you really want to know measure the muzzle and then put it on the pattern board,,,the board does not lie,,lol ocharry
__________________
YHS ocharry Last edited by ocharry; January 27, 2011 at 01:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 9,963
|
Like others advised - I think your answer is easily found by measuring the barrels vs the amout of constriction in the choke area for each barrel..
The Citori went into production in 1973 - and from 1973 thru 1975 they didn't even have a set nomenclature for the serial numbers other than an H and an N for 12 and 20ga - but then, they mixed in some J's for both gagues ..../ so they had a variety of conventions when they got production of that gun started - before they got it standardized in 1976. But it seems odd that they would stray from their typical "star"markings on the chokes. I'm wondering if you might have some kind of an after-market barrel on that receiver ?? Is the barrel plainly marked Browning ?? |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
|
yep. All original. I'll post of pic of it in a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 9,963
|
Interesting ....learn something new every day ....
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 212
|
Another thing you can do is check the muzzle with a dime and see if it corresponds with the numbers. The dime will not go into a full choke, will just go into a modified, and will have plenty of space around an improved cylinder.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 212
|
I didn't mean it to be an "end all, way to check". Just a quick reference. It works on my 3 12 ga. of varying makes.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2005
Posts: 9,963
|
Many Skeet and Trap clubs - have bore gagues - that you can borrow / or ask one of the members to give you a hand and take some measurements.
It just takes a few minutes. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Posts: 7
|
Here's a pic of the numbers as stamped on the barrel.....ok, nevermind. I keep getting an "upload failed message" ANy thoughts on what's going on there? I've uploaded before (other sites) with no problems...
All of the serial numbers match on the gun...from the fore stock, barrel, butt to the barrel. Still looking for some historical knowledge of the use of numbers and their corresponding meaning. I think the top is a modified, and the bottom is an improved....but it might be the top is a full and the bottom modified. What it is doesn't actually matter, the pattern does and I understand that. Just looking for the history of it as I find it fascinating. I've had this gun for years and shoot it well...never knew that it was a 1975 until this week when I decided to run the serial number. Got me interested in the numbers on the barrel and that history after I read the history on brownings website (which doesn't designate this numbering system...although I might email browning) and read up on some internet sites that have other info on the older citori's. THanks for all the interest and input!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,005
|
"Still looking for some historical knowledge of the use of numbers and their corresponding meaning."
Me too. I've been around guns for 50+ years and on line for 10 or 12 and all I've never run across a numbered Browning system. I love a good detective story. JT |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 6, 1999
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA
Posts: 6,005
|
On second thought, I decided that the numbers must be a carryover to the early Citoris from a (the?) system used by Miroku on the Miroku-marked guns or the guns they made for Charles Daly before FN and Miroku bought out Browning in '77 iirc.
Anyway, I was wrong. According to Wisner's, Miroku used a *- system similar to Browning's. http://www.wisnersinc.com/additional...kusprings.html Nuts. |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Junior member
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
|
Maybe they are aftermarket barrels by a firm who uses a different system?
I have known a few folks who have had Simmons and Baker make barrels for guns before.......????????? |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|