The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 12, 2011, 07:36 PM   #26
UpstateGlocker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2009
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 103
Notice how the 9mm guys always say "its almost equal to a 40", but the 40 guys never have to say "its almost equal to a 9" ? Just sayin.

In any event, for a first time shooter I recommend a 9, since it has less recoil and is a perfectly acceptable HD firearm (I know you said you are not a first timer, but the same principle applies). The .40 is definitely more powerful (which is why LE has moved over to it), but you feel that with more recoil. How much more? It depends on you (how well you control the gun, etc.) Most of us will acknowledge the 40 recoils more, but most will also say the difference is small. To some extent this is a Ford vs Chevy argument where the Ford is a 250 with a bigger engine/better suspension. Is it "better"? Yes, but how much and does it matter for your expected use? The U.S. armed forces seem to think 9mm is adequate (yes, I know about the NATO politics).

Bottom line: go with the 9 until you feel comfortable with it, then upgrade to a .40 if you feel you need the extra umph.
UpstateGlocker is offline  
Old January 12, 2011, 07:47 PM   #27
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,798
With the bullets availble in 1990 when the 40 was developed it did offer a significant increase in performance. That is no longer true today. Many PD's never switched and the trend in LE is going back to the 9mm with todays better bullets.

Not that I dislike the 40. I owned several for many years before advancements in bullets made it no longer necessary. The only reason I no longer own one is because I own a 10mm. The original 40.
jmr40 is online now  
Old January 13, 2011, 02:13 AM   #28
LockedBreech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 6, 2009
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,956
I believe the snappiness issue of the .40 to be one of the most exaggerated claims on gun forums.

My main is a .40 polymer. I have shot the cream of the 9mm crop beside it, including the Sig 226, Walther P99, and Glock 17. I shoot both with nearly identical speed and accuracy.
LockedBreech is offline  
Old January 13, 2011, 02:51 AM   #29
NWCP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2006
Posts: 1,772
I own a 9mm and a 40 HK USP. I practice a lot with my 9 due to ammo costs and carry my 40 on occasion. The 40 has more recoil than the 9 but given the right platform it's very manageable. My two pistols are identical with the exception of the caliber and I'd feel comfortable depending on either one to protect myself, or the family. 9mm is cheaper to shoot. Enjoy whatever you decide on.
NWCP is offline  
Old January 13, 2011, 07:19 AM   #30
spodwo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2008
Posts: 833
Ok - I shoot both .40 and 9mm. I have the S&W M&P in the 9mm. I shoot the .40 in a 229 Sig and G22 Glock. I also have a G19, a Kahr PM9, etc...

Here is the rub - with the platform you are getting - you will have a bit more of a snap from the .40. But frankly - all this "stopping power" stuff is moot if you can't obtain a critical hit. The true mantra is "bullet placement, bullet placement..." That M&P 9 is a fantastic and accurate shooter. Trigger is a littel mushy to me but you can get real accuracy with practice.

The 9mms have a variety of loads plus it is cheaper to shoot. The .40 is the primary Law enforcement load so you have that as a consideration.

But having both and liking both - I would go with a 9mm. Get proficient with that pistol and maybe down the road - go .40...the 9mm loads out there now are excellent.

I also have a .38 S&W J frame snubby - I wouldn't compare that to a .40...I would compare it to my 9mm Kahr PM9 with standard 9mm 115 gr loads.
spodwo is offline  
Old January 13, 2011, 10:43 AM   #31
FoxtrotRomeo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 14, 2010
Posts: 487
Quote:
I'm not a .40 fan, either. Want "punch", get a .45. Want lotsa boolits, get a 9. I like my 7-shot .45 and my 17-shot 9.
Since the OP is not a first time shooter I'm going to say .40 I'm going to say that because if you get the right pistol, you can get a conversion barrel and the right mags and shoot both. Problem solved. Why choose when you can have both?

And yeah I'm a .45 guy guy myself.

Quote:
if ya want punch get one a these
Yeah I got one of those too.

__________________
"The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly." - Albert Einstein]
FoxtrotRomeo is offline  
Reply

Tags
.40 , 9mm , caliber , defense

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08423 seconds with 7 queries