December 31, 2010, 10:21 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
|
Recoil 40 vs 45
I am getting ready to buy my first gun. I recently tried the Glock 17 and the Glock 23. The 23, being a 40 cal had more recoil to it. I am thinking of trying something that shoots a .45. I assume that will have even more recoil than the .40 for a similar sized gun.
Would that be true? |
December 31, 2010, 10:28 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: July 1, 2009
Posts: 71
|
it depends what you consider to be recoil.
a 40 cal is more of a muzzle flip a 45 cal is more of a push back. i can double tap quicker using a 45 cal because the muzzle does not flip too much. with practice i could double tap using a 40 cal but i personally cant stand that muzzle flip. you need to go to the range and rent a 45 cal firearm . also since this is your first firearm i suggest you get a DA/SA firearm {such as the fnp/fxp } the glock is more of a intermediate pistol. my first gun was a glock 19 and i had to modify the trigger to shoot that thing correctly Last edited by towncarblue; December 31, 2010 at 10:37 AM. |
December 31, 2010, 10:31 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
|
yeah, I didn't like it either when shooting the Glock 23.
|
December 31, 2010, 10:34 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 109
|
^^^That's been my experience as well.
I much prefer the recoil of the .45. It may more recoil, but it is a different and more manageable type of recoil. I wish this was not the case as the .40 makes possible smaller and higher capacity pistols. Sadly the .40 is a no go for me. |
December 31, 2010, 10:41 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: June 11, 2008
Posts: 52
|
I have a Glock 27 (40 cal.) and a Kahr PM40 - yes, there a little more recoil, but it's not that bad. The Kahr is a little worse than the Glock (obviously 'cause it's smaller) - but I like having the extra firepower of a 40 cal. I also have a Pf9 (Kel-Tec); the Glock and Kel-Tec (though different calibers) are about even in recoil. The little PM40 barks loud enough that you just know it's gonna do some serious work! Just MHO.
|
December 31, 2010, 11:12 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 5, 2002
Location: Ga
Posts: 515
|
.45 Recoil versus .40 and 9
All relative dependent on gun weight. With equal gun weights, the .40 will recoil more unpleasantly since it is a +P round. Standard pressure 9 mm and
.45 will flip and push less, respectively. I usually like 9 mm and .45 but would not turn down a good deal on a .40. The Glock 22/23 guns are not wildly popular without good reason. Not trying to flame a caliber war, I just prefer 9 and .45 personally. The short 10 mm (.40) is a great mid-caliber for both. In reality, all three calibers are manageble and easily handled with adequate range time by any shooter as long as the platform is a good fit in the hand. AND Happy New Year! Pico |
December 31, 2010, 12:52 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 546
|
In my experience, the recoil of a 40 S&W is "snappier" than a 45 ACP. However, my 1911's weigh about 40 oz. empty, whereas my XDm 40 only weighs 32 oz, and the weight of the gun affects how recoil is felt.
Given the choice between the two, I'd go with the 45 ACP, but I still like the 40 S&W. |
December 31, 2010, 12:55 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2005
Location: Bora Bora
Posts: 932
|
The recoil of a .40 for me is obnoxious to the point that I won't buy one.
9mm and .45ACP work just fine for me. |
December 31, 2010, 12:56 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 5, 1999
Location: TN
Posts: 786
|
I at first accepted the recoil of the .40, but over time, between shooting the G23 and G21, that I didn't want to experience that anymore. I sold off the G23 and now use the G21 exclusively. I am much more accurate with the G21, maybe because of the size differences or maybe because of the recoil differences, or maybe because of the longer barrel on the G21.
Either way, I can live without the .40.
__________________
"You can't get 'em all Josey." "That's a fact". "Well how come you doin' this then?" "Cause I got nothin' better to do." |
December 31, 2010, 01:24 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 308
|
Their is alot of factors that can affect the felt recoil-snap of a round, The wieght and make of firearm, your grip, and the way your arms are rotated when shooting it, hand and arm strenght.... ext. You need to find one that you like and works for you, learn to use it properly and you will be good to go. With todays ammo, I feel anything in 9, 40, or 45 will get the job done if the shooter dose his part. Best thing to do is find a club or range that rents guns, and go shoot several of them, find the one YOU like.
|
December 31, 2010, 01:30 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: September 1, 2010
Posts: 23
|
When shooting similar size/weight platforms, the .40 will be snappy, and the .45 will be more of a shove. I have fired my father's G23 next to my G30, and I prefer the G30. It is more comfortable for me to shoot.
|
December 31, 2010, 02:09 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Gwinnett County Georgia
Posts: 1,136
|
Just got back from the range
I tried a Sig Sauer P220, a 45 caliber...........sweet. I much prefer the 45 caliber to a 40. So, I am either going to get a 9mm, probably a Sig 226 or Ruger SR9 or a 45 cal Sig 220R. 40 Cal is not an option now.
The lower proce of the 9mm ammo may be a factor. |
December 31, 2010, 02:16 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: December 21, 2001
Location: Sierra Vista, Az
Posts: 27
|
Lump in the 40 cal hater category. The mussle flip it produces is off putting and for me it takes longer to get the sites realigned.
|
December 31, 2010, 02:38 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 16, 2010
Posts: 270
|
40 cal is a high pressure round, it tends to be "snappy" per se.
45 is a low pressure round, hence the less muzzle flip and more of a push back. The slow push back comes from having to push a heavy bullet out the barrel. Equal size guns, generally speaking the 45 will probably have less "felt recoil" - but much of it is personal preference. I have a 40, but I tend to shoot 45s better, although my favorite caliber thus far is still the classic 9mm. |
December 31, 2010, 02:43 PM | #15 |
Junior member
Join Date: March 13, 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,129
|
I can't believe the number of people here who find the 40 to be too much.
It's a little snappier, but Jeez. Are we men or am I in the women shooters forum? |
December 31, 2010, 03:21 PM | #16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 109
|
Quote:
My issue with the .40 is that I can't get the fast follow up shots or the accuracy that I can with the .45 or the 9mm. I don't think I'm alone on this. Sure with enough time, money, training, and practice I might be able to shoot the .40 just as proficiently as the .45 and the 9mm. I could also probably learn to ride a unicycle just as good as a bicycle if I really applied myself. Why? Or perhaps you are just more of a "MAN" than I |
|
December 31, 2010, 03:45 PM | #17 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2004
Location: Dixie
Posts: 2,315
|
Quote:
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...haven't we all? Quote:
No, no...it sounds like you da man... |
||
December 31, 2010, 03:56 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 109
|
Ok, I must confess. I enjoyed them IN MODERATION. lol
|
December 31, 2010, 03:56 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 18, 2006
Location: The Dodge House, NC
Posts: 183
|
40 S&W
Opinion of a Few Old Shooters
40 S&W Good Defense Caliber 45ACP Better Match Round. We used the same gun in different calibers. Loading Rounds with same bullet wt. and powder amount to meet a 165,000 Power Floor. Using 2 Chronographs we shot 5 Strings of 10 Round Lot of each Caliber. to verify both calibers were at the same Power Floor Each of us then Shot Rapid Fire 7 Round Mags 5 Times each person each caliber. Hands Down we all had Much Better Scores with the 45. Also: We are all Long Time USPSA-IDPA-SASS Shooters.
__________________
"A Man's got to have a Code, a Creed to Live By, No Matter his Job" Last edited by BODAME; December 31, 2010 at 04:57 PM. |
December 31, 2010, 03:57 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 22, 2009
Posts: 814
|
In my experience the recoil is very similar but feels a slight bit different. I haven't noticed much difference in muzzle rise, but if I had to guess I'd say the 40 may have a slight bit more due to it's greater velocity. To get an idea of the feeling, if you hold a pistol empty in a shooting position and have somebody hit the muzzle to simulate recoil, the 40 would feel more like someone slapped the muzzle and the 45 would feel like somebody made gentle contact with the muzzle and then shoved it back.
__________________
"Intelligence is nothing more than discussing things with others. Limitless wisdom comes of this." - 山本 常朝 Last edited by IMightBeWrong; December 31, 2010 at 04:02 PM. Reason: fixing grammar |
December 31, 2010, 04:00 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2004
Location: Dixie
Posts: 2,315
|
Quote:
|
|
December 31, 2010, 04:06 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,903
|
Quote:
|
|
December 31, 2010, 05:53 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2007
Location: LANCASTER,OHIO
Posts: 3,944
|
I got no problem shooting the 40, but comparing a G23 (40SW) to a G38 (45GAP), I find the GAP more accurate and faster back on target.
__________________
REAL EYES REALIZE REAL LIES |
December 31, 2010, 06:33 PM | #24 | ||
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
||
December 31, 2010, 06:50 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 5,457
|
In like platforms, I could never tell any significant difference between the 10mm and .45 Auto. A good number of .40 autos are compact/lightweight so it stands to reason that their recoil, particularly with hotter loads, will be more noticeable.
The smallest .40 I've shot with full-snort loads is a Kahr CW40 and I didn't find it bothersome in the least. It's a pussycat with 170 grain SWC's running 850 fps. It's important to remember that whatever caliber you choose, you have some leeway in load selection.
__________________
People were smarter before the Internet, or imbeciles were harder to notice. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|