The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 18, 2014, 05:13 PM   #326
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,220
MG, logic has no place in the Law or in the legislative process.
steve4102 is offline  
Old July 3, 2014, 10:10 AM   #327
Dan F
Member
 
Join Date: July 13, 2011
Location: MD *gah*
Posts: 54
If anyone knows... what is the status of Peruta now? Has the period for en banc challenge passed, does Harris (AG) have standing, is it being appealed to SCOTUS?

It just seemed to go away...

Dan
Dan F is offline  
Old July 3, 2014, 12:21 PM   #328
HarrySchell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: South CA
Posts: 553
No discernible action so far.

Bets range from the panel taking a very careful approach to the 9th taking the same approach as the DC Circuit and burying the case, since the "progressives" couldn't win in court.

The longer we go the more I think someone up there is trying to delay things as long as possible. The issues before the panel, allowing Harris to intervene and whether/not then to grant her plea for en banc, just aren't that complex (to this non-lawyer and some others smarter than me).

Unless a way is found to bury it, however, I think the chances are even or better it will stand, or go to SCOTUS. The majority opinion is way too well researched and reasoned to trifle with.
__________________
Loyalty to petrified opinions never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul in this world — and never will.
— Mark Twain
HarrySchell is offline  
Old July 4, 2014, 06:12 PM   #329
Metal god
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 2,029
Here you go , you check this from time to time . This is everything that has happened in the case to date

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/..._id=0000000722
__________________
As of this date 8-18-14 at 6:42am I became a proud grandfather I guess I'm officially old

Last edited by Metal god; July 4, 2014 at 10:25 PM.
Metal god is offline  
Old September 15, 2014, 03:44 PM   #330
motorhead0922
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 507
What's going on now? Nothing filed for 4 months, and we are now 7 months past the ruling? No en banc is scheduled that I know of...

Something must be happening right? Either that or Peruta has his CHL...
__________________
NRA, SAF, ACLDN, IDPA

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry
motorhead0922 is offline  
Old September 15, 2014, 09:06 PM   #331
Librarian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2007
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 141
Quote:
Something must be happening right? Either that or Peruta has his CHL...
Nope. No movement of any kind available to public knowledge.
__________________
See the CALGUNS FOUNDATION Wiki for discussion of California firearms law.

The FAQ page is here.
Librarian is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 12:55 AM   #332
62coltnavy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 215
I have a sneaking suspicion that perhaps the panel is holding its decision(s) until after the November elections, given the political impact of its rulings.
62coltnavy is offline  
Old October 16, 2014, 05:59 PM   #333
HarrySchell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: South CA
Posts: 553
Peruta Cited Again. Morris v. Corps of Engineers

From Morris v. Army Corps Engineers (D. Idaho Oct. 10, 2014):

"Plaintiffs challenge regulations promulgated by the Army Corp of Engineers that govern the possession of firearms on property administered by the Corps. Plaintiffs argue that the regulations violate their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms...

The Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm for self-defense purposes. That right extends outside the home. Peruta, 742 F.3d at 1166 (holding that “the right to bear arms includes the right to carry an operable firearm outside the home for the lawful purpose of self-defense”).

The Corps’ regulation bans carrying a loaded firearm for the purpose of selfdefense. It also bans carrying an unloaded firearm along with its ammunition. At most, it would allow a person to carry an unloaded firearm so long as he was not also carrying its ammunition. An unloaded firearm is useless for self-defense purposes without its ammunition..."

Next stop is the 9th Circuit.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/v...eers-property/
__________________
Loyalty to petrified opinions never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul in this world — and never will.
— Mark Twain
HarrySchell is offline  
Old October 16, 2014, 10:47 PM   #334
TDL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2013
Posts: 172
working link

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/v...eers-property/
TDL is offline  
Old October 17, 2014, 01:00 PM   #335
HarrySchell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: South CA
Posts: 553
Sorry.
__________________
Loyalty to petrified opinions never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul in this world — and never will.
— Mark Twain
HarrySchell is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.14872 seconds with 8 queries