![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Posts: 68
|
shooting the ruger old army
I drag the ruger with me yesterday to the range came up with a outstanding load
Triple 777 35 Gr. a wonder wad and a grease cookie top of ball ( 60/40 mix beeswax,lard no salt, 2 tablespoons of olive oil) The target 20 yards 6 shots maybe a 1 1/2" one hole group : but high just breaking the top of the black on the bullseye between 11 and 12 o'clock I find the father I shoot it 50 yards I run out of the rear sight adjustment to try to lower the rear sight .she still shoot high I have to say the gun can shoot |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,839
|
congrats,they do shoot
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,281
|
Your sight adjustment problem is typical with the ROA if you use anything hotter than a basic mild ball load. I first encountered the problem years ago when I tried conical bullets in my ROA. My simple fix was to get a taller front sight blade from Ruger. Some folks think the higher front sight is unsightly and opt for lowering the rear sight.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: March 2, 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 929
|
Yup, I'm one of those rear sight lowering kind of guys.
On the left, a factory original rear sight blade. On the right, a rear sight blade where the top and the notch have been filed down 1/16". ![]() The modified rear sight blade sitting on top of a factory un-modified one. If you don't like the result then it'll only cost you $2.99 for a new Rear Sight Blade. ![]() This solution gave me more than enough room to adjust for the issue of my ROA shooting high at 25 yards.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Posts: 68
|
I would like to change the front sight but as far as i can see it is not pinned
or is it? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,281
|
Mine was pinned. Have you looked under magnification?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: August 23, 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,281
|
ClemBert,
You make it look so easy, next time I'll try it your way. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 14, 2009
Location: Macon Co. NC
Posts: 520
|
Does the adjustment screw need to be thinned down too?
I've had to thin the top of the elevation screw on another Ruger (not an Old Army) before though...
__________________
Barney Fife: "Nip it, nip it, nip it!" Andy Griffith:"Oh now Barn'...." |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,348
|
In a different way
On mine I had to remove the adjustment screw and take some off the bottom. The screw was slightly long and bottomed out before the sight got to its lowest point.
__________________
Doc My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government. Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 1, 2010
Posts: 68
|
I did look at the option I could remove the complete rear sight and grind down the base of it were it con tacks the frame above the hammer.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 3, 2009
Posts: 33
|
I too have filed the rear sight on my Rugers to get a bit more adjustability. I think it beats the heck out of fooling around with the front sight.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|