The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Harley Nolden Memorial Institute for Firearms Research

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 2, 2010, 09:42 PM   #1
GWord256
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2010
Posts: 2
Arisaka Rifle? 6.5mm

I've got an attic find and it does not quite fit with models I can find with Google or Wikipedia.

It appears to be a Arisaka 6.5mm Model ???

Total Length 41.5" butt to muzzle
Measured muzzle bore 6.35mm
No marking other than shown in photos

Help?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1080150.jpg (95.6 KB, 88 views)
File Type: jpg P1080153.jpg (195.7 KB, 78 views)
File Type: jpg P1080164.jpg (191.3 KB, 71 views)
GWord256 is offline  
Old September 2, 2010, 11:34 PM   #2
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,340
Interesting! I have never seen an Arisaka with that type of rear sight. Almost looks like a Springfield sight mounted on an Arisaka. Anyway, your rifle is a Type 38 that has been sporterized and modified. Heavily sporterized.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is online now  
Old September 3, 2010, 07:19 AM   #3
GWord256
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2010
Posts: 2
Thank you. That would have been my best guess.

I'm no gun buff, I just enjoy target shooting but what is with the total lack of markings?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1080167.jpg (177.6 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg P1080170.jpg (208.5 KB, 26 views)
GWord256 is offline  
Old September 3, 2010, 07:28 AM   #4
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 10,600
Bubba cut the stock down and mounted 1903A3 sights, front and rear.
Interesting, there are a lot of cut down surplus rifles but the last thing done to them is new sights. Of course everybody wants a scope now.

Total lack of markings?
It has the serial number and arsenal stamp.
The imperial chrysanthemum was removed from surrendered rifles to protect the emperor's dignity or some such heathen superstition. May have knocked off other markings on the receiver ring along with it.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old September 3, 2010, 02:50 PM   #5
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 18,644
It probably started out as a Type 38 rifle as indicated by the two gas escape holes. The receiver ring was polished down, probably to remove the unsightly grinder marks where the "mum" was removed. Then M1903A3 sights were installed, though the range settings on the rear sight would be nowhere near correct for the 6.5 Japanese.

While there has been considerable collector interest in Japanese arms in recent years, that rifle has no value except as a shooter.

If you want to fire it, I strongly recommend having a gunsmith do a chamber cast to make sure it is still in the original caliber.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old September 5, 2010, 03:13 AM   #6
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 1,348
I agree with Jim Keenan, check the chamber before firing. A lot of those sporters were re-cut to 6.5 x .257.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old September 11, 2010, 05:51 PM   #7
publius
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,432
Great deer rifle.
__________________
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
publius is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07693 seconds with 10 queries