The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 10, 2010, 11:37 AM   #1
JonnyP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2009
Posts: 195
Sighted my Colts this weekend - bad ammo?

Took my King Cobra and Anaconda to the range this weekend with a little sight vice. Got to work.

Both required a little tweaking, but they're both "spot on" now at 75 feet. Used SD ammo for this purpose. I think it was 200 gr JHP for the .44 Magnum and 170 gr FMJ for the .357 Magnum.

Then something strange happened.

Started using up some .38 spl rounds I bought when I purchased a snubby for my wife (eventually sold it, but that's another thread). The shots were, for the most part, significantly lower than the ammo I used to sight the gun (King Cobra). My target was only about 15 feet away. Didn't have any more of the SD ammo and didn't want to buy another box just to recheck my work, so I just left and thought I'd try again another day.

Did I just get some bad ammo, or is this to be expected?
JonnyP is offline  
Old May 10, 2010, 12:15 PM   #2
girvin02
Member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2009
Posts: 32
Perfectly Normal

Heavier bullets will impact higher than lighter bullets.
girvin02 is offline  
Old May 10, 2010, 01:22 PM   #3
briandg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Posts: 1,701
your handguns, when fired with lighter loads will be in a much lower state of recoil when the bullet leaves the barrel. The line that you sight in on is not remotely on the point of impact, it will always be above the actual point of impact,so that when recoil forces the barrel upward, it will leave the barrel when it is on the proper line.
briandg is offline  
Old May 11, 2010, 02:13 AM   #4
SVO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2009
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 585
Could be that the .357, depending on loading, could have had a higher velocity with a flatter trajactory than the .38 specials.
SVO is offline  
Old May 11, 2010, 08:32 AM   #5
velocette
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 25, 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 786
Any handgun when fired has recoil. The gun will be moving in recoil while the bullet is still in the barrel. With heavier & lighter bullets, the heavier slower bullet will hit higher as it is in the bore, recoiling longer. Conversely, the lighter, faster bullet will hit lower.
It is a common task to regulate a fixed sight handgun's vertical point of impact with the same weight bullet by varying the powder charge, larger charge, (higher velocity, less barrel time), lower impact; lighter charge = higher. Or bullet weight, lighter bullet, lower impact; heavier bullet, higher impact.
When you think about it, one would wonder how anyone could hit anything with a handgun with all the things going on at the same time.

Roger
__________________
Trigger control + Breath control + Sight alignment = Gun Control.
http://www.hrpclub.info/
velocette is offline  
Old May 11, 2010, 11:19 AM   #6
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 10,817
Quote:
Could be that the .357, depending on loading, could have had a higher velocity with a flatter trajactory than the .38 specials.
+1

The difference in bullet weight and loadings (.357 vs .38) would cause a difference in point of impact. Couple that with the fact that you went from 75 feet to 15 feet and I think that would likely explain your results
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06914 seconds with 7 queries