The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 26, 2010, 12:27 PM   #1
jwaldrop3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 7
What's the highest magnification you need?

What's the highest magnification you need, in general, if you want to shoot targets at 500 - 800 yards? I'll be shooting a Rem. 700 SPS Tactical .308
jwaldrop3 is offline  
Old January 26, 2010, 12:28 PM   #2
zoomie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: WY
Posts: 1,745
What size targets? I think a 3-9x would be enough for big game at those ranges. Paper, I'd like double that.
zoomie is offline  
Old January 26, 2010, 12:53 PM   #3
Brian Pfleuger
Staff
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Central, Southern NY, USA
Posts: 18,624
A lot of it is what you're used to having, plus the size of the target.

I shoot woodchucks out to no more than approximately 300 yards and I use 25X. They're pretty large, really. 15 inches by 6, give or take a couple. I don't think most long range guys go 25X at 1000 yards.
__________________
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
---
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
-The Architect
-----
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old January 26, 2010, 01:16 PM   #4
CK_32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2009
Location: Orange County, Ca
Posts: 450
Im actually picking one up today in about an hour
Id go with 15x is about all you will need. Nothing more unless your planning on shooting eggs at that range. But 3-9x is a good range. 10 fixed powers are good if you want a fixie. Not really recomended tho.

PM me some grouping and your set up when you get her all finished.
I kinda wanna see another SPS tac in action.

GL!
__________________
Bullet placement over bullet wastement
CK_32 is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 05:00 PM   #5
James R. Burke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Location: U.P. of Mich/Quinnesec
Posts: 1,897
Just myself I would go with the 6.5x20x50mm Leupold. But that is just myself there are some nice ones out there. Sometimes with that bigger bell you wont get a good check to stock weld looking up. But most target or tactial rifles take that into account so the stock is fit correct for them.
James R. Burke is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 05:57 PM   #6
NESHOOTER
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2009
Posts: 509
I use 3x9 for larger targets but because of my old eyes I use 18 on a vari-pwr scope and I can say it helps me in all my long range shooting....
NESHOOTER is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 08:36 PM   #7
James R. Burke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Location: U.P. of Mich/Quinnesec
Posts: 1,897
For hunting I use the 3x9x40mm plenty big enough for me. I keep it set on 4x most of the time anyways.
James R. Burke is offline  
Old February 4, 2010, 08:51 AM   #8
southernmaninla
Member
 
Join Date: November 26, 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 31
I shoot 6 and tinker with 1000 I like a 8.5-25x Leupold mil dot
__________________
A wise man knows which hill to die upon.
southernmaninla is offline  
Old February 4, 2010, 10:45 AM   #9
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,416
Quote:
What's the highest magnification you need?
Hunting = 4X
Long Range Targets = 10X

Hunting you want field of view.
Competition you want to see the target, but with anything over 10X you start washing out your target by magnafying the mirage.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old February 4, 2010, 07:45 PM   #10
MOREAMMO
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 5, 2009
Location: Southeast WI
Posts: 144
Am I the loner here? I am not a hunter, just paper puncher. I started with a 3-9x then a few 6-18x's and now have 8-32x's. That would be on rifles that are a .308, .223, and a 22-250. I love HIGH MAGNIFICATION! My uncle has the fixed Leupold 45x. Do I need it, probably not, but I guess I really like to see what I am shooting at. Now a 32, 36, or 45x for hunting is not very practical, but being able to read fine print at 200-300 yards is awesome!
MOREAMMO is offline  
Old February 5, 2010, 06:30 PM   #11
Bolosniper
Member
 
Join Date: September 10, 2005
Location: Dillon, Montana
Posts: 70
No, your not a loner. I punch paper, and hunt year round. I started my career as a shooter as a sniper in Vietnam. We used a 3-9x40mm Redfield ART scope.

I now use a 3-18x42mm (35mm body) as the smallest, and have only occasionally used it, with my primary scope being a 6-24x50mm (35mm body). I use it on everything from 22-250 Rem to the .33 caliber "Super Magnums". The large body and objective bell diameters give me a very wide field of view and can be used easily for close shots (300 yards and closer), but when I reach down range the higher magnification allows me to pinpoint the strike of the round on the target rather than the cross hairs covering the whole target. Most everyone I know that loves the long range rifle game as I do will generally be using a variable power scope with a lot of magnification on the top end.
__________________
Mike McIntyre
VP Operations
MPI Rifles, LLC
[URL=http://www.mpirifles.com]
Bolosniper is offline  
Old February 26, 2010, 05:56 PM   #12
ForneyRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2007
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 725
I had a Tasco 3-9x40 that was on 7mm Mag for hunting out to 300 yards. It was fine when I was 19yoa, but not at 40yoa. I upgraded to 4-14x42mm and am comfortable out to 500 yards.

I ran the 4-14 on my .223 AR for 100 yards and 200 yards shooting. 200 yards was iffy at 40yoa. I got the 8-32x for target shooting the AR.

World champion F T/R (1000 yards) won with a Leupold 8-25x VX3 scope.

March scopes is coming out with 8-80x scope this year. Leoupold, Nightforce and Schmidt & Bender have scopes at 45x.
__________________
When all is said and done, there is a lot more said than done.
ForneyRider is offline  
Old February 26, 2010, 06:12 PM   #13
fastforty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 1999
Location: In a kornfield in kalifornia
Posts: 1,161
If you're shooting at 500-800 yards and your target is smaller then say, a semi trailer you're going to wish you'd got at least a 18-25 power scope. Anything less powerful and the crossed hairs or mil dot is going to completely cover any standard target- no chance for zero'ing in on the bullseye.
__________________
When Banjos are outlawed, only Outlaws will have Banjos
The Bible is my lawbook. I turn the other cheek when applicable, and spend the rest of my days resisting evil at every front, until I have breathed my last breath.
fastforty is offline  
Old February 26, 2010, 06:30 PM   #14
azredhawk44
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 6,465
1x per 100 yards that you know how to shoot.

Making the target bigger in your eye doesn't negate the fact you have to know your cartridge's ballistics from your rifle.
azredhawk44 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11174 seconds with 9 queries