The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 30, 2010, 08:24 AM   #1
MMA1991
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 14
Recommended Powder Load for Steel Frame 1851 Navy Colt

This has probably been asked a million times and I tried searching for the answer on the site but no joy.

New to BP and have been using 30 grains of Hodgdon 777 FFFg in my 44 caliber 1851 steel framed Pietta Colt "Navy".

Any thots/recommendations? Too much?

Thx

MMA1991 (a.k.a. The New Guy)
MMA1991 is offline  
Old January 30, 2010, 08:38 AM   #2
toolslinger
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 30, 2009
Posts: 102
Sorta Hot

777 is hotter than Holy Black. 30 grains is fairly stiff . Should not actually hurt the gun though.
toolslinger is offline  
Old January 30, 2010, 09:07 AM   #3
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,868
Colt specs are 25-30 grs with 25 recommended for the 60 Army .44. I would think a 51 in .44 would be the same.

Reduce 777 by 15% so a 25 grain load less 15% is 21.25. So 21-23 grains would be a good 777 load to start with. Your 30gr load of 777 is the same as 34.5 of black. That's about all the black powder you can get in a Colt .44 chamber. I think you well find the revolver is more accurate at a lower charge.

As I recall my .44 flask spout is 27 grains and my normal load.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 04:42 PM   #4
MMA1991
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 14
Do you think I did any damage to my steel frame 1851 Navy .44 Cal Pietta with the 30 grains used to date? The recoil was not real stiff.....

This BP stuff is addicting......
MMA1991 is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 06:58 PM   #5
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,754
The gun can withstand all the powder you can cram in the chamber without damage. Accuracy will be poor, but you won't do any damage.
mykeal is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 09:50 PM   #6
ClemBert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 929
FWIW, Hodgdon's Cap-N-Ball data:

36 cal 1851 Navy steel frame: 20 grains = 832 fps

44 cal 1858 Army steel frame: 25 grains = 763 fps

44 cal 1860 Army steel frame: 25 grains = 592 fps


45 cal Ruger Old Army: 35 grains = 987 fps

I would think your 44 cal 1851 is most like the revolver above in bold print. Why the muzzle velocity of the 1860 is significantly lower than the 1858 I haven't got a clue but there ya go.
ClemBert is offline  
Old February 9, 2010, 05:59 PM   #7
steelman762
Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2010
Posts: 61
The load range is 22 to 30gr fffg powder. You can go to the Traditions web and get the info. Pietta makes revolvers for Traditions. The whole manual is on line. traditionsmuzzle.com
steelman762 is offline  
Old February 9, 2010, 08:04 PM   #8
MMA1991
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 14
Thanks...I should have known better.
MMA1991 is offline  
Old February 10, 2010, 08:33 AM   #9
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,868
I would be very skeptical of any Italian manufacturers manual.

Like mykeal said you can fill the chamber with out damage to the revolver. You well find the most accurate load for your revolver is going to be in the 25 gr area, plus or minus 5 grains or so. It takes a several grain change in powder to see a difference in accuracy or poi. You can shoot a whole box of rb finding the sweet spot.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old February 15, 2010, 06:02 PM   #10
MMA1991
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 14
Thanks madcratebuilder.

The Italians are good with food but their machine work leaves a little bit to be desired.....had to work on the bolt stop to get the timing right and when I took the pistol down all of the internal parts needed a good buffing to get the metal smooth.

But hey, for less than $300 I don't have too much room to complain.

R/
MMA1991 is offline  
Old February 16, 2010, 11:00 AM   #11
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 4,562
Yup!

And it is fun working on the pistols.
__________________
Doc

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government. Thomas Jefferson
Doc Hoy is offline  
Old February 16, 2010, 11:25 AM   #12
Jbar4Ranch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 1999
Location: Near Helena, Montana
Posts: 1,539
The right charge is as much or as little as you want to use. As long as the ball is seated firmly on the powder charge with no air gap between them, and it doesn't stick out and keep the cylinder from turning, you're fine.
__________________
Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets replaced...

SASS 47015
Jbar4Ranch is offline  
Old February 16, 2010, 01:12 PM   #13
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
The right charge is as much or as little as you want to use.
Well I guess that depends on what your definition of the 'right' charge is. To my way of thinking the 'right' charge is the one that results in the greatest accuracy, or, to put it another way, the smallest group size. And that certainly isn't 'as little or as much as you want to use'. If I understand your concept, the 'right' charge is any charge that doesn't cause damage, regardless of whether or not you can reliably hit anything with it.
mykeal is offline  
Old February 16, 2010, 05:27 PM   #14
steelman762
Member
 
Join Date: January 18, 2010
Posts: 61
MMA1991, I had to take apart my Traditions ASM made 1858 new army also. The timing was off with the bolt and had alot of burrs to clean and polish off also. I also found out later that ASM does not make revolvers for Traditions anymore and is not supported by them. I found this out when I bought a spare cylander and discovered it did not fit. I then drove back to traditions with the revolver and showed them the problem. Thats when they told me they no longer supported ASM. Nothing is the same between the two except the model. I have been in their show room and looked at most of what they offer. For the price on some of them you would think the machine work,fit and finish would be a little better. I guess you get what you paid for. I no longer support Traditions. :barf:
steelman762 is offline  
Old February 16, 2010, 08:34 PM   #15
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,754
Traditions no longer supports ASM manufactured guns because they've been out of business for several years. Not Traditions' fault.
mykeal is offline  
Old February 16, 2010, 08:44 PM   #16
MMA1991
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2010
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 14
My pistol is made by Pietta.
MMA1991 is offline  
Old February 16, 2010, 11:51 PM   #17
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,754
I understand. However, steelman762 said his gun was made by ASM, and my post was directed to him.
mykeal is offline  
Old February 20, 2010, 11:52 PM   #18
Gatofeo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2004
Location: Remote Utah desert
Posts: 222
I owned a brass-framed 1851 back in the early 1970s, in .44 caliber.
As I recall, I could only get 25 grains of DuPont FFFG black powder in the cylinder, and be assured of having enough room to seat a ball. In those days, I did not use a greased felt wad between powder and ball.
Chamber capacities can differ, but I don't think you'll be able to get more than 30 grains (FFFG equivalent) of powder in those chambers. The 1851, when made in .44 caliber, has the smallest capacity chambers of any .44 revolvers.
I'd be careful with Hodgdon 777. It is NOT intended to be substituted straight across with black powder, like Pyrodex is. It's fairly strong stuff. The warning to reduce by 15% is a good idea.

I haven't found 777, nor Pyrodex, to be as accurate as Goex FFFG black powder but if it's all you can get then, go for it.
Use a .454 inch ball, instead of .451 inch, whether Pietta or Uberti made the revolver. The larger ball, when rammed into the chamber, sticks to the chamber walls with greater tenacity. This discourages ball movement during recoil.
Also, the larger ball, when rammed into the chamber, creates a wider bearing band for the rifling to grip. In my experience, this enhances accuracy. Certainly, it means better obturation in the bore.

Yep, cap and ball revolvers are definitely addictive.
It's so ingrained in my blood that historical records of the future will probably read, "Lake Gatofeo was formed when the ol' desert cat was cremated and the crater formed by the blast began filling with water ..."
__________________
"And lo, did I see an ugly cat. Smoke. Brimstone. Holes in parchment. And this ugly cat was much amused." --- The Prophesies of Gatodamus (1503 - 1566)
Gatofeo is offline  
Old February 21, 2010, 07:04 AM   #19
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Yep, cap and ball revolvers are definitely addictive.
It's so ingrained in my blood that historical records of the future will probably read, "Lake Gatofeo was formed when the ol' desert cat was cremated and the crater formed by the blast began filling with water ..."
That's priceless. A man could have no better epitaph.
mykeal is offline  
Old March 2, 2010, 09:43 PM   #20
ZVP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2009
Posts: 804
I have read that the most popular load for a .36 Navy is 22 grains of Black powder by Volume. I load Pyrodex by volume to the same mark.
I have used this load for about a year now and have had good luck with accuracy from it' For a .44 Brass Frame I drop the load to 20 grains of pyrodex and have not had problem number one and it is VERY accurate at 15 yards.
I use s 30 gr (by Volume) load in my '58 Remington Army's. They are a much stronger frame and the load dosen't seem to put any strain on them at all.
ZVP
ZVP is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.11422 seconds with 7 queries