The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 28, 2010, 08:35 AM   #1
jwaldrop3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 7
Is 8x too much for hunting?

Being a newbie, I want it all and I want it now! I bought a Rem 700 SPS tactical .308 that I mainly will use for target shooting. I'm looking at the Bushnell 4200 8-32X40 scope. My problem is, if I do want to hunt with it, will the 8x be too much magnification for hunting?
jwaldrop3 is offline  
Old January 28, 2010, 08:53 AM   #2
Limey46
Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 22
Yes, as you suspect, it will be too much for hunting. Way too much, in fact. My personal preference is a 2X-7X kept at its lowest setting unless I really need more magnification (which hasn't happened yet). A 1X-4X is even better.
Anything over 4X, you find yourself looking at a lot of bushes where you thought the critter was.
Limey46 is offline  
Old January 28, 2010, 09:44 AM   #3
mapsjanhere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,352
ok, the 8x is fine, the 32x is overkill unless you're going for 1000 yard shots. I usually think a 2.5-10 is a good choice, you have the low setting for moving targets, and a 10x for the well aimed shot from the stand.
__________________
F 135 - the right choice
mapsjanhere is offline  
Old January 28, 2010, 12:02 PM   #4
Brian Pfleuger
Staff
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Central, Southern NY, USA
Posts: 18,788
8X minimum is WAY too much for hunting... especially for newb. Unless you're talking prairie dogs or woodchucks, then it's fine.

I've never owned a long gun that wasn't scoped. I generally go no more than 3X for minimum, although I usually walk around with it at about 5.
__________________
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
---
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
-The Architect
-----
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old January 28, 2010, 07:42 PM   #5
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 11,482
What are you hunting and where? In general however, a scope that starts at 8X is WAY too much scope.

A 3X9 adjustable would be where I'd start for hunting and or target shooting.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Old January 29, 2010, 03:06 PM   #6
CK_32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2009
Location: Orange County, Ca
Posts: 450
No unless its fixed at 8x hunting you wanna get low vareable powers.
8x is about where you wanna cut it off. a 2.5-8x is fine or anything around
that you wont really need anything more than that like ever.

If your looking to target shoot up to 15 is good. But if your looking for a hunt/target
scope go with a 2.5 or 3-8 or 9x and your fine. But dont be
looking to long range shoot out around 1000 mark youll need a little more
power than that. But the 3-9x is perfect for what your probably going to go for
__________________
Bullet placement over bullet wastement
CK_32 is offline  
Old January 29, 2010, 11:39 PM   #7
bejay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2008
Posts: 195
I would only go down on power a little so you can use the scope for both target shooting and hunting, 8 power is a little to high as mentioned but if you can get that down around 4-5 you should be fine, maybe a 4-16 would be a better choice to have a balance between a hunting and target scope.
bejay is online now  
Old January 30, 2010, 12:18 AM   #8
LarryFlew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2009
Location: Minnesota CZ fan
Posts: 895
Another vote for 4-16ish. My son has 4-16 on his 270 and I use a 4-14 on 223 for yotes and prairie dogs. In the woods and brush even lower would work as suggested in the 2or3-9 range.

Whichever you pick, YES 8 is WAY to high for the low number
LarryFlew is offline  
Old January 30, 2010, 07:51 PM   #9
Suwannee Tim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 27, 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 319
Though I have never looked through one, I suspect that a Bushnell 8-32X40 would be a big disappointment. I have a Luepold 8.5-25 and the brightness and exit pupil really suffer in this range. I expect the Bushnell would be a lot worse. I would want a maximum of 4X for the low number for hunting. These super high magnifications do not buy you much and sacrificing the FOV you get at low power is a high price to pay. I have a Nikon 2.5-10 with a 30 mm tube that I like a lot. Unless you shoot benchrest competitions you give up little with 10X maximum.
Suwannee Tim is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 04:46 PM   #10
James R. Burke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Location: U.P. of Mich/Quinnesec
Posts: 1,897
For hunting I believe it will be to much. Target shooting is another matter. For hunting I like the 3x9x40mm or 2x7x33 mm. I leave them set on 4x most of the time.
James R. Burke is offline  
Old January 31, 2010, 11:39 PM   #11
Lawyer Daggit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2004
Posts: 1,181
For varminting, 8x is fine, for anything larger it is way to powerful.

I agree with the other posters. on a 308 go for a fixed 3x or 4 x or a 3-9x30 or 2-7x variable.
Lawyer Daggit is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07624 seconds with 7 queries