The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 5, 2009, 06:36 PM   #26
ibdecent
Member
 
Join Date: June 1, 2009
Location: Brainerd MN
Posts: 82
I guess I'd say this thread amounts about the same as "why would anyone ever hunt with an assualt rifle?"

I don't, but if I wanted to, why should anyone care? If I can do it in a safe manner that affects nobody and can make a clean kill, then who are you to tell me what I can and can't hunt with?

just think about it.
__________________
There's no substitution for caliber
GLOBAL WARMING? What temperature is it supposed to be?
Machinists do it with precision
ibdecent is offline  
Old December 6, 2009, 12:44 AM   #27
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,464
I'm rarely interested in passing laws against somebody's notion of how to do things that don't really hurt anything.

My problem with the use of a .50 BMG is that's not particularly a hunting gun. A shooting gun, yeah, but I pretty much figure that shooting what I hunted for is sorta up close and personal. Now, some might think my self-imposed limit for range at around 400 yards is longer than they'd shoot, but to me it's reasonably up close and personal.

Shooting something which is basically farther away than is readily or easily seen with the nekkid eyebone just doesn't sit right with me.

And hunting is supposed to be fun. Toting somewhere around 30 pounds of go-bang doesn't really strike me as fun.

So I wouldn't want to pass a law against it. But the idea strikes me as really silly.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old December 6, 2009, 01:18 AM   #28
noyes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 27, 2008
Posts: 1,032
Interesting Thread

Sounds like military use should be questioned also.......
noyes is offline  
Old December 6, 2009, 01:20 AM   #29
Mike U.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 2, 2007
Location: In Oz, next door to the Lollipop Guild's HQ
Posts: 404
Yeah, I agree. NO LAWS against it, please.
After thinking about it for awhile, I believe it's really a 'to-each-his-own' kind of issue.

For example, I'd have no problem at all with using one to turn varmints into
RED MIST!

That would actually be fun. Maybe, too much fun.
I KNOW it would be too much money.
__________________
L'Chayim!
Mike U. is offline  
Old December 6, 2009, 02:54 AM   #30
sc928porsche
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
I have always wondered why they never used the 50bmg cartridge for DG in Africa. They do use big bores down there. With the progress that barrett and mc millian have made with the rifles, it seems like a logical choice. Just a thought.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it.
sc928porsche is offline  
Old December 6, 2009, 03:26 AM   #31
fixxervi6
Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2008
Posts: 91
I thought I saw someplace that due to the burn rate of powder the "limit" of burned propellent shots is something like 5050 fps? I dont' remember the exact number.
fixxervi6 is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 02:59 PM   #32
banditt007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2006
Posts: 692
Quote:
What in the world do you consider fast? Here are some velocities from different bullet weights out of the .50bmg.
I consider using normal bullet weights for the gun that shoot over 3200FPS or so 'fast'. when off the shelf bread and butter 30-06 and .270's shoot right at or very close to 3k FPS, it seems more of a 'normal' velocity than a 'super duper blazing fast magnum' round. Sabots are a whole different story, which of course ups anythings velocity considerably. W/o a doubt the WEIGHT of the bullet that the .50 can shoot at 3k FPS is impressive, but the velocity figure itself is not IMO. Perception differs per person though a round at a mere 2k FPS would seem blazing fast to one who only shoots black powder weaponry....for example...
banditt007 is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 05:32 PM   #33
A_Gamehog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2009
Location: Central Oregun
Posts: 559
Why not use a Tank?

Funny stuff....why limit yourself to just a ".50" cal

http://onemansthoughts.wordpress.com...keet-shooting/

Skeet shoot with a Tank!!
__________________
"Happiness is knowing the Barred Owl is Eating the Spotted Owl and environmentalists are watching Nature take it's course"

Last edited by A_Gamehog; December 9, 2009 at 07:56 PM.
A_Gamehog is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 05:39 PM   #34
zombieman
Member
 
Join Date: November 27, 2008
Posts: 25
I actually saw a guy using one to hunt grizzly bear on the outdoor channel the other day. Made a 500 yard shot on one and dropped it where it stood.
__________________
"Its our job to put a chunk of steel in our fist and kill the sons-of-bitches that our coming to kill our children!" Lt. Col. Dave Crossman
zombieman is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 06:14 PM   #35
LordofWar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 28, 2009
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 646
I'm 100% the OP's never hunted in the bush (Africa) or for competitive game like Ibex, Himalyian sheep etc.

There comes a time when you're so fatigued even a side arm starts to weigh a 100 kgs.
LordofWar is offline  
Old December 8, 2009, 11:53 PM   #36
Madpipe
Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2008
Location: Queen Creek,AZ 85242
Posts: 25
50 bmg

That just sounds like a waste of a hunt. to heavy to pack in and then to heavy to pack out.
__________________
Oh Well
Madpipe is offline  
Old December 9, 2009, 12:44 AM   #37
Swampghost
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: Florida, east coast
Posts: 2,106
My new hunting setup.

A Barrett .416 (still supersonic @ 2500 yds.), 12" reflecting telescope (spotting), card table, lawn chair and cooler. Oops, minimum wage guy to fetch.

Now I can get from 50 to 100#s of meat for only about $20K!
__________________
NRA Patron Member
Swampghost is offline  
Old December 10, 2009, 02:04 AM   #38
rottieman33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 27, 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 223
My brother has a 50 BMG. Like 1 person said he wouldn't want to lug that around. It is a heavy gun and you need almost double ear protection to shoot it. What I read the bullet doesn't start to drop until after 1800'. Plus it one hell of an expensive bullet to shoot, Last time I shot it the rounds were $50 for 10. There is a couple benefits if the deer is behind a oak tree you shoot threw the tree and and if your hungry you could cook the deer meet with the muzzle flash.
rottieman33 is offline  
Old December 10, 2009, 06:44 AM   #39
CajunBass
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 6, 2005
Location: Chancellorsville, Virginia
Posts: 3,410
I remember reading I believe in Bud Anderson's (WWII Ace) autobiography that Chuck Yeager was the best shot he ever saw. He said that during training, Yeager would kill antelope for fresh meat for the squadron, with a M/G on his fighter rigged to fire single shots. A ground crew followed in jeeps to pick up the kills.

True or not? I have no idea. Also not sure if the A/C had 50 or 30 cal guns, but IIRC it was a Bell P-39 so I'd guess 50.
__________________
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16 (NKJV)
CajunBass is online now  
Old August 7, 2012, 08:00 PM   #40
Squartus
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 7, 2012
Posts: 1
For the past year I have actually started hunting with my barrett 50cal. I thought to myself hmm.. this $10,000 gun "with scope" that I enjoy to shoot more than any rifle I own seems like it would would cause less pain for the animal. So I decided to try it out.

Now I would agree that going for lung/heart shot would totally mangle say a deer of any size. That being said iv always used neck shots, wastes no meat and very very fast kill (not saying its best way, just what I prefer)
Some say its not sporting to hunt with a 50cal etc, sure its a easier kill but when I set out to hunt my goal is to take down the animal with little to no suffering. And of course to feed myself, which my barrett did with perfection.

Most drop to the ground or simply fall over without ever taking a step, no suffering.
But this is just me, not saying its right or wrong way I have avid respect for any hunter that makes a clean kill no matter the weapon used.
Squartus is offline  
Old August 7, 2012, 08:49 PM   #41
Hansam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 763
Idaho has a weight limit on the gun you can use to hunt with? What idiocy! The way I see it if someone wants to hunt with a 40lb gun let them! Its not my back and shoulder that'll be hurting at the end of the day. Heck I'd bet there's some guys out there with AR rifles that weigh close to 20lbs after all the crap they've bolted on lol!

Wisconsin has no limit on the weight of the gun nor the caliber (well you have to hunt deer with a centerfire cartridge larger than .22 but no max). We also don't have an ammunition capacity limit either when it comes to all hunting aside from waterfowl/migratory birds. I believe that restriction is Federal and not state.

If I wanted to go hunting with a 50BMG that holds 100 rounds and weighs almost 100lbs overall it wouldn't be illegal in WI. I might get more than a few strange looks and maybe a rolling laugh from the local warden but its still not illegal.

Personally I won't be hunting with a .50BMG because I simply just don't want to a) pay for the bugger and the ammo to go in it and b) lug that weight around with me in the woods.

Aside from that I highly doubt it'll cause deer to explode or anything like that when hunting medium to large game. What it WILL do though is most likely kill the target effectively and fairly quickly - so effectively the game may not even know it'd been hit before it dies.

Just a note I DO hunt with a fairly heavy gun - 16lbs with scope and ammo. I use a DPMS LR-308 for my deer hunting. My daughter uses an AR frankengun in .223 although this year I'm going to graduate her to a 6.8SPC. I don't consider either rifle an "assault weapon."
__________________
This is who we are, what we do.
Hansam is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 08:00 AM   #42
CharlieDeltaJuliet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 25, 2012
Posts: 750
They make hollow points for hunting. I shoot a 50 monthly and there is NO way I would hunt with it. My 660 gr ball ammo averages about $2.25-2.50 a round, the A-Max's are about $6 a shot. I think the hollowpoints are $5-6 a shot too.
CharlieDeltaJuliet is offline  
Old August 8, 2012, 03:26 PM   #43
robhof
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 16, 2007
Posts: 700
robhof

I know for a fact that the Wart Hog pilots at England AFB used to take hogs and cattle that roamed near the target areas, as I was a medic in one of their units and got to watch their target shooting from the Clayborne tower. Those were 30mm rounds and the remains looked like ground meat with bone slivers, pigs practically disappeared, except for a smear. It used to knock down their score as the wildlife wasn't counted as hits. Of course this was in the good old days; pre-pita.
robhof is offline  
Old August 9, 2012, 07:59 AM   #44
Rifleman1776
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
I watched one of those African hunt shows on TV where a guy used a .50 BMG on an elephant. The elephant was just standing about 50 yards, or less, from the shooter. He had to get on the ground in prone position and use a bi-pod to shoot. Of course, the elephant dropped in it's tracks. Everyone congratulated him on being a great hunter (not IMHO ). Then they walked the 25 yards back to the truck while the natives cut up the animal. Shooting a cow in my pasture would have been more adventursome.
Rifleman1776 is offline  
Old August 10, 2012, 11:04 PM   #45
bacardisteve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 373
We used one in Texas on Feral hogs just for fun. I would love to take it to prarie dog town and blast em at long range. All the 22 centerfire guys would be envious especially on a windy day.
__________________
Kill em all and let God sort em out! USAF
bacardisteve is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 06:43 AM   #46
MikeGunz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 195
Heres a dear hit with a .50 BMG, pretty devastating. Seems like a waste of meat

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsD64KkCBFs
MikeGunz is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 07:44 AM   #47
Ricklin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 22, 2008
Location: North Orygun Coast
Posts: 604
When the debate over gun control gets heated, it's guys like the ones in the above video that I despise. Including them as individuals who's rights I am trying to defend is difficult at best.

And of course they post their "exploits" on you tube.
__________________
ricklin
Freedom is not free
Ricklin is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 09:13 AM   #48
Edward429451
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
Who needs to hit a deer with 13K FtLbs? Children playing at doing things out of the ordinary because it's "cool".

I have more respect for the guy who takes a 257 Roberts & a 87 gr bullet after Elk than I do for the guy who takes a 50 cal BMG. Going light with surgical precision is more impressive to me.
Edward429451 is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 10:11 AM   #49
Mayor Al
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Southern Indiana, Near Louisville.
Posts: 211
Some of you senior citizen may remember the 'cheap' exotic gun ads in all the magazines back in the 60's...One I have never forgotten was for a SKI/Sled-Runner Finnish anti-tank rifle in 20mm. It looked like a cross between a Bren-Gun and a Boyz Bolt Action. The text had a cartoon image of a Bugs Bunny way out in the distance, with the text saying "Kill that Jackrabbit at 2000 yards, with a hit or even a near miss !".
I recall the ammo going for a dollar a round, but don't recall how much the gun sold for (Mail order coupons in the magazines had the sale prices) .. This would have been in the early 1960's (pre-68 ban)
Mayor Al is offline  
Old August 11, 2012, 07:18 PM   #50
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,434
Zombie thread, nothing like resurrecting a nearly three year dead topic.
__________________
NRA Life Member
The Truth About Guns
taylorce1 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.15118 seconds with 7 queries