The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old November 18, 2009, 12:05 PM   #1
Paul B.
Senior Member
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,852
serious gun control threat

The article says it all.
Paul B.
Paul B. is offline  
Old November 18, 2009, 12:17 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2008
Posts: 312
How tough will it be to get majority of the countries that join this to vote antigun. It seems to me only antigun countries would consider joining this group. Stupid global views like this really tick me off. If your country wants really tough gun laws to control crime then have fun. I prefer my country to control crime with guns in citizens hands.

They can have my guns from my cold dead hands.
doh_312 is offline  
Old November 18, 2009, 01:04 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2009
Location: homeless
Posts: 140
We are going to have to keep an eye on Hillary Clinton, who opines that Mexico's gun violence is a direct result of America's 'lax' gun control.

Stay tuned.
end up with the right regrets
omega is offline  
Old November 18, 2009, 02:19 PM   #4
Bartholomew Roberts
Senior Member
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 5,933
Yes, this is pretty much the same treaty that the U.S. supported under Clinton in the 1990s, and then killed when Clinton was replaced by Bush in 2000. The United States opposed it in the UN again in 2006 (That vote was 139 for, 24 abstaining and only the U.S. as "against").

Of course, now we have a new administration and a filibuster-proof Senate. So if the United States wanted to ratify this treaty, they wouldn't have much trouble doing it. Luckily for us, the UN will not move on this until 2012 - which means three more Congressional elections and a Presidential election where we can make our voices heard.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old November 18, 2009, 02:59 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: February 28, 2009
Posts: 399
Nobody I've seen has yet presented a convincing argument as to how this has anything to do with civilian gun ownership and use rather than what is says on the label, which is international arms trafficking.
ADB is offline  
Old November 18, 2009, 03:12 PM   #6
Glenn E. Meyer
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 16,657
The story is a month old and the OP is a drive - by - thus closed. Sorry, saying the article says it all isn't what we want.

NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc.
Being an Academic Shooter
Being an Active Shooter
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2015 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06325 seconds with 7 queries