The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 1, 2009, 03:59 PM   #1
Shotgunnr
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 5
remington 870 question

Is there any other way to make an 870 express accept tube extensions, other than pressing, drilling, or filing out the dimples? Is there any way to order a new "police tube" and just install it? I dont want to rig anything if i dont have to.
Shotgunnr is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 04:15 PM   #2
hogdogs
Staff In Memoriam
 
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
IIRC, The tube to receiver attachment is not as easy on an 870 as it is the mossberg family... so the dimple removal may be easiest/cheapest...

Brent
hogdogs is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 04:31 PM   #3
Shotgunnr
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 5
well in that case... which procedure would pose the least amount of damage, or risk to the longevity of the shotgun?
Shotgunnr is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 04:35 PM   #4
rantingredneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,728
Brent is correct. The magazine tube is a factory installed part on the 870.

Just drill them out and dress the edges with a round needle file. The holes will not be visible once the barrel is installed as the barrel ring will cover them. Otherwise, use a dremel and a sanding drum bit and go to work from the inside. I've done both and both came out well. No long term risk to the gun. I do not recommend using the "socket method" that some propose to press the dimples back out. too easy to screw that up and knock the mag tube out of round.

See above where the mag tube isn't user replaceable..........
__________________
NRA Member
NC Hunter's Education Instructor

PCCA Member (What's PCCA you ask? <- Check the link)
rantingredneck is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 05:11 PM   #5
Shotgunnr
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 5
thx guys.
Shotgunnr is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 06:23 PM   #6
Lee Lapin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2004
Location: SE NC
Posts: 1,238
'gunnr,

IMHO it's best to leave 'dimpled' Express guns alone. The plastic piece the dimples hold in place retains the magazine spring, and also keeps the magazine cap tight. Now if you're never going to use the gun as a sporting gun again, I suppose it would be no big loss to drill out the dimples and negate the use of the magazine cap detent. But it will be necessary to jury-rig some way of keeping the magazine cap tight if you ever go back to the standard magazine.

If you want an Express with a magazine extension, best bet IMHO is to buy the factory version from the gitgo instead of trying to jackleg something. You get a good magazine extension into the bargain that way. Or buy a used, older version of the Express that doesn't have dimples to start with.

http://www.remington.com/products/fi...ic_7-round.asp

Best yet, learn to load the gun on the fly. "No magazine is ever big enough." - Louis Awerbuck, on shotguns.

JMHO, YMMV....

lpl
__________________
Mindset - Skillset - Toolset. In that order!

Attitude and skill will get you through times of no gear, better than gear will get you through times of no attitude and no skill.
Lee Lapin is offline  
Reply

Tags
870 , remington , remington 870 , shotgun , tube

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08496 seconds with 7 queries