The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 4, 2009, 02:01 AM   #1
WeedWacker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,529
help to find the make of this Enfield

I picked this up a couple weeks ago and after fruitless attempts with the internet not being friendly towards my queries I simply cannot find the make of this rifle. At first glance it looked like it had a jungle carbine stock on it but there are no markings for barrel bands, almost as if it's a sporter version with wood. It also has barrel lugs on the end by the crown almost as if to attach a flash hider...

Pics:



__________________
- Weed
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs 45 ACP? The answer is 42.
WeedWacker is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 09:10 AM   #2
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,868
It's a sporter .303, or as some call them a Bubba. Look on the left side of the receiver for identifying marks. Looks like a 4/1 or 4/2. Great hunting rifle. Looks a lot like what I did to my first Enfield back in 62. For a total cost of $20 I had a great brush gun.

Here's a No5 Mk1 for comparison.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 10:44 AM   #3
Tidewater_Kid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 447
Looks like a No. 4 Lee-Enfield to me. Stock has been cut and hand guards removed. It could be restored to original since the barrel did not get cut.

Some great information here: http://enfieldrifles.profusehost.net/main.htm

Picture of one of mine for reference:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg savageno4-1.jpg (29.8 KB, 22 views)
Tidewater_Kid is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 11:09 AM   #4
WeedWacker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,529
Madcratebuilder, I notice that your No5 Mk1 has a bayonet lug on the underside of the front sight. Mine does not nor does it bear any toolmarks that would indicate there had been one there in the first place.

There aren't many markings on it to begin with. It has a more recent etched in importation number (SER. MK4413***) and a number on the left side of the receiver below the safety reading DA24754. Is ther anywhere else I can look, there are several numbers stamped on the barrel, most of which are barely legible, with what looks like a cartouche of a crow which I assume is the marking of England.


I took it out to shoot yesterday but it was at the end of the day and clouds were rolling in. Only got two shots off and only one of them nicked the paper plate. These sights take some getting used to... Anyway i really like the trigger on this thing compared to my Mosin and M1903. With a little tweaking this might wind up being my primary woods gun. That is if I feel like risking getting it banged up in the woods.
__________________
- Weed
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs 45 ACP? The answer is 42.
WeedWacker is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 11:20 AM   #5
Tidewater_Kid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 447
Weedwacker,

The lugs in front of the sight band for for the No.4 spike bayonet. The bottom lug on the No.5 is for the bayonet that fits that model. Your barrel is correct for the No.4. Here's a picture of my Savage No.4 sporter. Note the two different bayonets they fit the No.4.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg savageno4.jpg (24.3 KB, 25 views)
Tidewater_Kid is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 11:29 AM   #6
RJay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,633
Week Wacker, What TideWater is telling you , You don't have a Number 5 Jungle Carbine. You have what looks a Mark 4 No1. The stock has been cut off and modified to make a hunting rifle out of it.
RJay is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 11:36 AM   #7
WeedWacker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,529
Tidewater
That looks very similar to my rifle with the exception of the front sight. Any particular reason for that?

RJay

I know it's not a Jungle rifle, "jungle carbine" is what first popped into my head when I saw it and was trying to figure out what it was.
__________________
- Weed
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs 45 ACP? The answer is 42.
WeedWacker is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 01:05 PM   #8
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,868
Quote:
That looks very similar to my rifle with the exception of the front sight. Any particular reason for that?
Because they are both No4's. Your rifle has had the hand guard removed and the lower cut down to "sporterize" it. You can easily put it back to original because the barrel has not been cut. New front wood and barrel band would do it. OR you can just use it as is. You have the flip sight on your rifle. There are better sights that well fit, from hundreds of dollars for a Parker-Hale or a ladder style found on most No4Mk2's.

The different NO & Mk numbers can be very confusing to the new Enfield owner. There are dozens and dozens of variations of this basic rifle and all have their own No&Mk. At least a half dozen different manufacturers with different stamp #'s It takes awhile to take it all in.

If you have a good barrel I think you well find it to be a fairly accurate rifle. Mine all shoot 2-3moa, maybe better with a better rifleman.

Here's a 1955 manufactured No4Mk2. The cheek piece is added, it's from a Enfield"T" or "TR" model (sniper rifle) Your rifle basically looked like this when new.

madcratebuilder is offline  
Old October 4, 2009, 02:41 PM   #9
Tidewater_Kid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 3, 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 447
Weedwacker,

The difference is the front sight protecter. Look here: http://www.e-gunparts.com/product.as...ductSKU=487130



TK
Tidewater_Kid is offline  
Old October 5, 2009, 02:21 AM   #10
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 4,694
Is it marked "Long Branch" on the left side of the receiver?
gyvel is offline  
Old October 13, 2009, 02:05 AM   #11
Aussie Pete
Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 15
The rifle in question is/was a No.4 Mk1 or Mk2. Without being able to look closer I can't tell the difference. However the No.4 Mk2 had the variation where the trigger assembly was fixed to the receiver frame and not, as in the Mk1, fixed to the wood.
What's missing:
The bottom wood has been shortened and reshaped.
The top 2 woods.
Middle and front bands (to hold the wood pieces)

It seems that someone has had an attempt to sporterise it. The sights are the "Battle sights" and flip-up/down for 100 yards or 300 yards. The finer "Singer" sights will fit.

From what I can see it would be relatively easy to bring back to Military spec.
Noticed that the rifle is cocked, I presume it has been cocked for the picture.
__________________
We are what we are because of what we were:
Aussie Pete is offline  
Old October 13, 2009, 02:04 PM   #12
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 4,694
If you look at the top picture on page 219 of Ian Skennerton's book, The Lee Enfield Story, you will see a photograph of a virtually identical rifle, captioned: "This early production No. 4 rifle is tagged 'EXPERIMENTAL (woodwork cut-away)' and appears to have been a prototype lightened rifle."

It appears to have been a well documented modification and also appears to be legitimate as it is "tagged" by (I assume) the Enfield Pattern Room.
gyvel is offline  
Old October 14, 2009, 01:15 AM   #13
WeedWacker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,529
Quote:
Noticed that the rifle is cocked, I presume it has been cocked for the picture.
Checked action before the pic, just didn't take the time to "de-cock" it.

How easy would it be to get a scope mount for this that doesn't require smithing? I'm a little leery of the 6 o'clock sights and want something a little more precise. The sights are fantastic and I did pull a decent group once I got the hang of it but I can't spend as much on ammo for this as I can my other rifles since the local supply of surplus is no where to be found...
__________________
- Weed
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs 45 ACP? The answer is 42.
WeedWacker is offline  
Old October 14, 2009, 07:07 PM   #14
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 19,124
It was a Rifle No. 4, Mk 1, made at Long Branch in Canada during WWII. It is not any kind of rare experimental.

It is now a hunting rifle. If you want a No. 4, that one could be restored, but No. 4's are still inexpensive, so balance the cost of the necessary parts against the cost of an unmodified rifle. Don't forget 1) the hassle of finding all the right parts and the time involved in doing the work and 2) the restored rifle won't be at all "correct" as the parts will be a mishmash.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old October 14, 2009, 07:14 PM   #15
dreamweaver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2008
Posts: 713
Quote:
Here's a 1955 manufactured No4Mk2. The cheek piece is added, it's from a Enfield"T" or "TR" model (sniper rifle) Your rifle basically looked like this when new.

that's a beauty!! i don't think i've ever seen furniture that shade before. is it one of the aussie imports?
__________________
http://takdriver.com/
dreamweaver is offline  
Old October 14, 2009, 07:35 PM   #16
mp25ds4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Posts: 392
id restore it. you probly could for about 150$.
im not fortunate enough to have a no. 4 that could be restored, the front 1"-1-1/2" of the barrel has been cut off
__________________
Liberal Newscaster Katie Couric, while interviewing a Marine sniper, asked:
'What do you feel.....when you shoot a Terrorist?'
The Marine shrugged and replied, "A Slight Recoil."
mp25ds4 is offline  
Old October 15, 2009, 01:54 AM   #17
Aussie Pete
Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 15
Here's a 1955 manufactured No4Mk2. The cheek piece is added, it's from a Enfield"T" o

The rifle, by the date and the No.4 Mk2 designation would be what is termed from the "Irish Contract". I have one of these, any with the same wood/colouring. These, well mine is, were made in England at the Fazakerley plant.

These / mine is a very accurate shooter, I use it in a monthly military shoot.
__________________
We are what we are because of what we were:
Aussie Pete is offline  
Old October 15, 2009, 01:56 AM   #18
Aussie Pete
Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 15
Here's a 1955 manufactured No4Mk2. The cheek piece is added, it's from a Enfield"T"

The rifle, by the date and the No.4 Mk2 designation would be what is termed from the "Irish Contract". I have one of these, and with the same wood/colouring. These, well mine is, were made in England at the Fazakerley plant.

These / mine is a very accurate shooter, I use it in a monthly military shoot.
__________________
We are what we are because of what we were:
Aussie Pete is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10589 seconds with 8 queries