The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 22, 2009, 02:31 AM   #1
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 5,229
1911 Shoulder Stock Question

If you have the shoulder stock, have one (or more) 1911 pistols laying around, but don't have the 16" barrel OR the slotted mainspring housing that is required for the stock to be placed on the gun, is that a violation of the law? Is it still considered as "constructive possession?"
gyvel is offline  
Old September 22, 2009, 02:36 AM   #2
PTK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 442
Quote:
If you have the shoulder stock, have one (or more) 1911 pistols laying around, but don't have the 16" barrel OR the slotted mainspring housing that is required for the stock to be placed on the gun, is that a violation of the law? Is it still considered as "constructive possession?"
If you don't have the means to attach the stock to a pistol with sub-16" barrel, it's not an SBR.

It's like asking if since you have an extra Remington 870 stock and a handgun, is that an SBR?


I assume you want the stock purely for novelty purposes or for display?
PTK is offline  
Old September 22, 2009, 07:11 AM   #3
paull
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 9, 1999
Location: SE Texas, 'tween Houston & Galveston
Posts: 157
Constructive possession has nothing to do with construction.
p
paull is offline  
Old September 23, 2009, 02:03 AM   #4
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 5,229
Quote:
If you don't have the means to attach the stock to a pistol with sub-16" barrel, it's not an SBR.

It's like asking if since you have an extra Remington 870 stock and a handgun, is that an SBR?


I assume you want the stock purely for novelty purposes or for display?
What's got me confused here is that you have two out of the three necessary parts to make an illegal SBR, missing only the easily removable mainspring housing. In light of other absurd BATF rulings such as possession of an AR15 and any one of several M16 parts being a machine gun, I was wondering if they have deemed that as some sort of "intent" of making an SBR.

Not real keen on your metaphor of the 870 stock and the handgun as neither piece was ever intended for the other.

The stock was in a bunch of junk that I bought from an estate. Personally, other than being a bit of a novelty, I don't find shoulder stocks particularly useful. From a collector's point of view they are interesting, though.
gyvel is offline  
Old September 23, 2009, 02:05 AM   #5
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 5,229
Quote:
Constructive possession has nothing to do with construction.
Sorry, I wasn't quite clear on the meaning and concept of "constructive possession." I think I got it now. Thanks.
gyvel is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06697 seconds with 7 queries