The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Curios and Relics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 5, 2009, 09:46 PM   #1
7jinxed7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2009
Location: no where
Posts: 352
Mosin or Mauser?

I've considered buying a WW2 bolt action rifle.I've been looking at Mosin Nagants and Mausers.The Mausers were a Yugo I haven't seen any Germans yet.Which is better choice?I like the feel of the bolt on the Mauser much better compared to the Mosin.I have never fired either.I'm considering ammo cost,accuracy and availability of accessories.The Mosin seems to be the cheaper but I would like input from someone who owns these rifles.
7jinxed7 is offline  
Old September 5, 2009, 09:55 PM   #2
Ignition Override
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2008
Posts: 1,793
As for ammo prices, you can't beat 7.62x54R prices.
I've seen very few people offering to sell 8mm ammo at similar prices, and maybe a modest amount on any website (and it won't last long, at all).

Have only owned two Mosin Nagant 44s, but no Mausers.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old September 5, 2009, 10:00 PM   #3
7jinxed7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2009
Location: no where
Posts: 352
How was accuracy on your Mosins?The 44 is the shorter carbine correct.
7jinxed7 is offline  
Old September 5, 2009, 10:04 PM   #4
gawoodsman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 6, 2008
Posts: 12
i have hunted deer with a m44 mosin with just the iron sights and it shoots sraight. heavy though. those rifles are built to last. and the ammo is cheap. the mauser has a much better feel to it and it does cycle smoothly. i own a couple of each and i think it would come down to whichever one you prefer as the ammo is about the same price. you can't go wrong with either.
gawoodsman is offline  
Old September 5, 2009, 11:07 PM   #5
raftman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,889
I've got a Mosin M44, but have fired the 91/30 as well, and a Yugo Mauser. Assuming similar condition, the Mauser will be more expensive to buy, and more expensive to shoot. But the Mauser's definitely still worthwhile. You really wouldn't be making a bad choice if you buy either one, so maybe you should get both.
raftman is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 12:41 AM   #6
7jinxed7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2009
Location: no where
Posts: 352
Anybody know if their is a real difference in the German and Yugo Mausers?
7jinxed7 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 05:12 AM   #7
l.cutler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 18, 2005
Posts: 142
If you are looking for a WWII rifle, I believe most if not all of the Yugoslavian Mausers are post war. Others more knowledgable will chime in.
l.cutler is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 07:38 AM   #8
ksstargazer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Location: Flint Hills of Kansas
Posts: 316
The M48 Yugo mausers are intermediate length actions. The bolt parts are not compatible with the standard 98 Mauser.
There are Yugo mausers that are refurbished German mausers.
Both the standard mauser and Soviet mosin are 3-4 MOA rifles. There are some very accurate mausers - Czech M98/22, Swedish mausers of all models, as well as some standard German mausers that happen to be very accurate.
You can also find some consistently very accurate mosins such as the Finnish models and the carbine M91/59. With the Soviet mosins, it is a gamble as to whether they will be more accurate than 3-4 MOA.
When it comes to ammo, the mosin has an advantage as the ammo is still readily available at about 20 cents per round. 8mm is becoming more difficult to find - you can still find Romanian at about 30 -35 cents a round.
ksstargazer is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 07:42 AM   #9
7jinxed7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2009
Location: no where
Posts: 352
Good info ksstargazer. That gives me a good idea what to look for.
7jinxed7 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 08:37 AM   #10
CGSteve8718
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 14, 2007
Posts: 798
I strongly suggest looking for a Finnish Mosin Nagant. Same action, same design, same ammo, only beefed up and improved. They should also fill the collector aspect of your search, as you can find many that are WW2 era.

Basically, an excerpt I read somewhere puts it like this, the Finns took the Mosin Nagant, a conscript rifle, and turned it into a rifleman's rifle.

Another WW2 bolt action rifle that is really smooth and accurate are the various Enfield rifles. They are designated by types, which is an entire book of info in itself, but some quick research will let you know which types were most prevalent during the war.

Like the one poster mentioned, there are Yugo refurbed K98k rifles, but the ones that you've seen are probably post war M48s. However, nothing wrong with the K98k except for ammo consideration. In a way, you'd still be getting a "Russian" rifle, as in you'll most likely be getting a Russian capture K98k if you decide on that. The Mosin Nagants did their part, but any Mauser action/rifle would be smoother and far better produced with manufacturing and attention to detail than the Mosin Nagants. Oversight on detail of manufacturing was eventually thrown out due to wartime necessity, but I'd bet a "last ditch" K98k is made with more care than any 91/30, M38, or M44 ever was. However, the Russians would probably look at that as a compliment of the highest degree.

If money is a concern for the rifle itself, then I say the Russian Mosin Nagants are your best bet as they are still relatively cheap. A German Mauser K98k, even a Russian capture will go for at least $100 or close to $200 more simply because German/Nazi militaria is, and was much more popular and in higher demand than any Soviet/Russian or combloc stuff.
__________________
"You are fighting for what you can never obtain, and we defending what we mean never to part with." Thomas Paine

Last edited by CGSteve8718; September 6, 2009 at 08:58 AM.
CGSteve8718 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 11:51 AM   #11
7jinxed7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2009
Location: no where
Posts: 352
I would love to get a German Mauser for $100.00 to $200.00. I haven't seen any that cheap though. I'm not really getting one for collecting and value but more for shooting.So if wasn't actually used in WW2 it's not a big deal although it would be a added bonus if I did find one cheap.If I get one close to those years would be fine.I saw Mosins at the gunshow this morning but no good prices.They were 91/30 round barrel none MO markings for $130.00 from what I've read thats a little steep.
7jinxed7 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 12:18 PM   #12
gyvel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 5,229
Mosin or Mauser?

I like them both, but quite frankly, I think I would go with the Mauser
gyvel is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 01:44 PM   #13
simonkenton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 891
The Finnish M39 Mosin Nagant is a beautiful rifle, very accurate.
You won't get a good one for $130, however.

Mosin ammo is lots cheaper.
I went up to a dealer in Johnson City Tennessee four years ago, bought a case of 700 rounds of Turkish 8mm ammo for $32.
The guy told me the stuff came in crates so big they had to unload 'em with a forklift, weighed over a thousand pounds.
He still had two unopened crates in the back.
The happy days of cheap 8mm ammo are gone.
simonkenton is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 04:44 PM   #14
Tom2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,647
I would go with the full length Mosin unless you have some real purpose to get a shorter one, as in collecting or in addition to the long rifle. The long rifle will be more pleasant to shoot. They can be as accurate as a 98 Mauser, in general. With ammo it likes and after you tweek the front sight for windage, if needed. With all surplus guns with basic sights like that, you are rolling the dice. Some will shoot way high at 100 yards, they were often designed to engage an enemy at much longer distances. Some will do fine. A Mosin I have is right on target at 100 yards with the sight set lowest if I am using the light ball ammo. Ditto for a SMLE rifle and a Japanese 99, they all shoot on target with a 6 o clock hold at 100 yards and the ammo I have for them. The Mosins are regulated with the bayonet on the barrel, so you will have to probably adjust the windage if you shoot without that! The MN is obviously a more primitive design than the Mauser, it is sort of an evolution of some earlier designs as well as late 19th century stuff as it was adopted in 1891. The 98 Mauser has the advantage of rapid state of the art changes before it was designed. But even the earlier Mauser models were superior in design to the Russian. Still the Russian is fully refined as far as the design can be and unless the workmanship is lacking it will certainly perform as designed even under adverse conditions. And since they cannot be nicely sporterised like the Mausers, they are cheaper on price and ammo. Just to use it to sling lead at the range, it is not a problem if the safety is whack or the mag protrudes down or the bolt handle sticks out straight.
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you!
Tom2 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 05:09 PM   #15
SigP6Carry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 27, 2009
Posts: 1,086
I honestly think that you should consider what each gun is, what the cost is and what you're more interested in getting the gun for. I'm getting my 91/30 on tuesday, and I'm happy as hell to be getting it for many reasons. I'd personally prefer the 91/30 over a K98 because I felt that the Russian weapons of WWII were much more interesting than those of the Wehrmacht and that the plight of the Russian people was far more interesting than the failure of the Wehrmacht. I also find the lower price and cheaper ammo more beneficial to myself.

Now, I would MUCH rather get a Springfield 1903 myself, but the cost of the rifle surpasses my preference (and financial means). I basically compromised with the 91/30.

If you have the disposable income, it's entirely up to you about which rifle you're more inclined to get. The ammo for each is fairly easy to get (I have two local stores stocking non-corrosive and surplus ammo within 10 miles of me for both!) I'm not gonna sit here and tell you "get the 91/30 cause that's what I got!" But I'm gonna sit here and tell you what I prefer and why and see if that helps you make your decision.

As for "accuracy" and "quality" the MNs and Mausers (and copies) can all be accurized, but there's no "this rifle is more accurate" end all statement. And quality of each rifle depends on several factors. If you get war-time Mausers, their milling is lower quality than pre-war Mausers. If you get weapons built in certain amories, they're supposedly lower quality than others. And the next issue is: how well was the rifle maintained. If you get a "higher qaulity pre-war Mauser" that's been used and abused and has a blacked out barrel, the "lower quality war-time MN" that's better maintained is going to be a better rifle.

There's more to this decision than just "this or that" and there's lots of questions you have to ask yourself about it. Good luck, and I hope you find the perfect rifle for you.
__________________
-liberal gun nut = exception to the rule-
-1.24274238 miles, because Russians don't need scopes-
-Gun control was the Klan's favorite law, how can you advocate a set of laws designed to allow the denigration of a people?-
SigP6Carry is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 05:17 PM   #16
mp25ds4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 6, 2009
Posts: 392
I have 2 mosins and I just bought a yugo mauser off of gunbroker for 157.00 I think that mausers are better built rifles, 7.62x54r is some of the cheapest ammo out there besides .22lr, 8mm surplus ammo isnt too bad, its still alot cheaper than .303 brit tho, You could get a mauser off of jgsales.com for 150.
German mausers are pretty expensive so if your looking to save money I would go for a mosin or yugo mauser
__________________
Liberal Newscaster Katie Couric, while interviewing a Marine sniper, asked:
'What do you feel.....when you shoot a Terrorist?'
The Marine shrugged and replied, "A Slight Recoil."
mp25ds4 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 05:46 PM   #17
7jinxed7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2009
Location: no where
Posts: 352
Wow I didn't realize their were so many Mosin lovers out there.I noticed that no one has any real complaints about either the Mosin or Mauser.I guess I'll decide when I find a good deal on one or the other.I have considered the Yugo Mausers for the simple reason they are cheaper and easier to obtain vs. the German.I hoping to get one or the other in the coming months if not maybe I can talk the wife into getting one for Christmas. I have to convince her that I need another rifle though.
7jinxed7 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 07:43 PM   #18
3StrikesNC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2007
Location: in a house
Posts: 473
i have a M44 Mosin, love the carbines!

Also currently 'looking" at a Mauser.

Can't have one without the other .....
3StrikesNC is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 08:32 PM   #19
simonkenton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 891
The Mosin Nagant is an ugly rifle. The mag extends below the stock, they are just kind of awkward compared to the elegant Mauser.
The Mosin Nagant safety is just weird, almost unworkable compared to the elegant Mauser safety.

Nevertheless, the Mosin Nagant is a great rifle with a great history. They are rugged and reliable. If you get the right 91/30, or Finnish M39, it will be as accurate as any Mauser, or more so.

The Finnish Mosins are really cool. The Finns captured many thousands of Russian Mosin Nagants during WW1.
They knew they would be mixing it up with the Russkies again, so between the wars they reworked their captured guns. There are 5 or 6 versions of Finnish Mosins, but for the M39 they used the Russian receiver, and put a completely new stock on it. They used barrels from Finnish firms, Sako or Valmet. They made new sights. The Finnish Mosins are the only Mosin Nagants with screw adjustable front sights.
The M39 had to shoot a 3cm, or slightly over 1 inch group, at 100 meters, or it could not leave the factory.
The Finns were right, they mixed it up big time with the Russians in WW2, and Finns shot and killed hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers with their highly accurate and reliable Mosin Nagants.
Better still, when Finnish ski troops captured a Russian ammo convoy, they could shoot Russians with captured Russian ammo!
With virtually no air force or armor, the Finns fought the Russian giant to a standstill in World War 2, on the strength of the Finnish Mosin Nagant.

Last edited by simonkenton; September 6, 2009 at 08:42 PM.
simonkenton is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 09:05 PM   #20
Tom2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,647
Yes the Finns are certainly historical and more desireable, maybe the only holy grail of the Mosins is the US made ones under contract that were probably easily the finest of the breed for quality, but those are unobtainium for the most part and the time to get a bargain on the Finn imports is long gone. The US made ones were sold for truly peanuts in the prewar years for NRA members and alot of them were made into bargain basement sporting guns but the survival rate seems rather miniscule except for some Russian imports recently, that are ones that were actually delivered to the Russians before the revolution(and usually reworks). This 43 vintage one I have is about as crudely finished as you will find on a military gun but works real good. I got another but have not had a chance to fire it yet. All it has different is a much nicer stock of what looks like bare wood or oil finished with all the sharp edges intact and not sanded. Watch the recoil on that small little steel buttplate and clean the bore as the surp. ammo is corrosive but other than that it goes bang and can be cheap fun.
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you!
Tom2 is offline  
Old September 6, 2009, 10:03 PM   #21
Ignition Override
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2008
Posts: 1,793
7:
A friend who is a sharpshooter (retired from a military rifle team) tried one of my MN 44s from 50 yards, using his small sand bags. The bore is fairly shiny but not bright. This guy has won some AR matches from 200 and 600 yards with iron sights.

He had such a large group from his sandbags on the black plastic target (yellow holes) that he never found where two of the rounds even went. From 50 yards.
Let me emphasize that the Heavy Ball (HB) Bulgarian is supposed to make really large groups with many MN 44s.
Can't tell you about the 44 with other Bulgarian or Czech, Polish ammo etc.

Last edited by Ignition Override; September 8, 2009 at 03:05 PM.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old September 7, 2009, 01:24 PM   #22
Tomh
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 15, 2009
Posts: 6
I have an M91/30, and from a standing position, have no trouble hitting an 8x10 target at 100 yds. It's a 1937 model from the Ishevsk arsenal. I am just fascinated with the history of the rifle, and what, and where, it may have been. The fact that it is accurate, and comfortable to shoot, is just icing on the cake. The M44's have a really monsterous muzzle blast, which I find very cool, but others may find objectionable. I love the Mausers too, and am currently looking for a German model. I guess what I'm trying to say is, they are all good, and the history of whatever rifle you choose, is an added bonus. Handle a few, fire em, and go from there, you cant go wrong either way.
Tomh is offline  
Old September 7, 2009, 08:50 PM   #23
ISC
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,982
US made mosins aren't that hard to find. Finding one in original configuration in good shape is quite hard though.

Mosins were also made in France and Belgium prior to WWI. Those are extremely rare.

Finns are easily the best made mosins. I just ordered a Valmet M39 for $219.
ISC is offline  
Old September 7, 2009, 09:30 PM   #24
ISC
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,982
double post
ISC is offline  
Old September 8, 2009, 10:43 PM   #25
Erfurter1937
Junior Member
 
Join Date: September 3, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 10
8mm Mauser

I believe the 8mm Mauser is a round with a great track record and the ammo is still pretty cheap. If you want to shoot long distance, 8mm and 30-06 are really good for that.
Erfurter1937 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12452 seconds with 7 queries