The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 12, 2009, 08:10 PM   #1
Uncle Billy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 10, 2009
Location: Small city in New York
Posts: 482
Spotting scopes

I need a new spotting scope, one that will focus close enough to see .22 caliber holes at 50 feet and have enough magnification to see .22 caliber holes at 100 yards. Can anyone recommend one that's reasonably priced?
__________________
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?
Uncle Billy is offline  
Old July 12, 2009, 08:43 PM   #2
CortJestir
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 7, 2008
Location: Southern CT
Posts: 1,406
I just bought this Leupold Sequoia Windriver 15-45x60mm kit after concluding my research. I just took it to the range for the first time this week and I am very impressed with its performance.

.22 cailber holes at 50 yards are not a problem. I have not yet had the chance to take it out to 100 yards, but I foresee no issue discriminating .22 holes at that range either. The picture is clear and bright at 50 yards and eye relief is good. It's good glass for the money.

The kit's nice - the protective case is handy, but the tripod leaves something left to be desired. I'll probably replace it with a good pole-type tripod at some point.

I paid $220 for the kit on eBay NIB. A pretty good deal. OpticsPlanet has them for $264 (without case and tripod).
__________________
"They have men amongst them who know very well what they are about..."
- Lord Hugh Percy, on the events of April 19, 1775
Do you know what you're about? Find out at an Appleseed near you.
CortJestir is offline  
Old July 13, 2009, 04:37 AM   #3
Dallas Jack
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 25, 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 381
Take a look at the Burris Landmark 15-45x60mm. I think I paid around $170.00 for mine and it has no problem seeing .22 caliber holes at 100 yards. Just for a quick test I looked though it at my security keypad at about 30 feet. I had no problems reading the small print.

Another scope I looked at was a Winchester. I do not know who makes them but they had very clear optics. The Bushnells are also worth looking at for an inexspensive spotting scope.

It is best for you to take your time and look though any scope you are considering. If you get one that puts a strain on your eyes it will give you headaches. Good luck in your search.
Dallas Jack
Dallas Jack is offline  
Old July 13, 2009, 07:56 AM   #4
Uncle Billy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 10, 2009
Location: Small city in New York
Posts: 482
Thanks, guys, for the information. I was up against it: either get a good spotting scope or trade my .22 Hornet for something that makes half-inch holes that my antique eyes can see.
__________________
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?
Uncle Billy is offline  
Old July 13, 2009, 08:31 PM   #5
oneounceload
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: N. Central Florida
Posts: 8,518
You might also try using the shoot-n-c target from Birchwood Casey that make the yellow splotch around each hole - made it easier for me to see 100 yard shots, and I have a 30X spotting scope
oneounceload is offline  
Old July 14, 2009, 07:17 AM   #6
fineredmist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2008
Location: Wethersfield, ct
Posts: 120
I have found that using targets with red or orange bulls makes seeing .22 cal holes a lot easier.
fineredmist is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08632 seconds with 7 queries