The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 24, 2009, 09:59 AM   #26
Brit
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 29, 2005
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 867
A noted point

Strange what you notice... on his third, and last shot, no follow through, he (the good guy shooter) abruptly pulled the pistol back to his chest, quite possibly affecting that last shots accuracy, a habit a few of my students have picked up.

Bulls eye shooters develop follow through, the good ones.

The above was what you notice from the eye of a fellow shooter/instructor.

His tactics, well executed, lock up and focus real good, and what can not speak, can not lie, THREE SHOTS-THREE HITS! And no hits on the other individuals in the office.

When a person is holding a gun in this instance, they are a instant target, instant! You have no control of their hand or brain! None, turn wrist, press trigger, bullet leaves gun... a second, half a second?

Your only recourse, the control factor you have, fire rapid aimed shots, which he did, and bad guy down, bad guy in jail, good results.

Shot in the back? nose? or big toe? Who cares, at any time a criminal is holding a gun, he can fire it! Solution, like our night employee did, shoot quick accurate shots. Two hands, two eyes, all hits.
Brit is offline  
Old May 24, 2009, 03:11 PM   #27
Creature
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,769
Quote:
Shot in the back? nose? or big toe? Who cares, at any time a criminal is holding a gun, he can fire it! Solution, like our night employee did, shoot quick accurate shots. Two hands, two eyes, all hits.
Bingo.

= good shoot.
Creature is offline  
Old June 8, 2009, 01:34 AM   #28
cloud8a
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 27, 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 341
WOW! that is really scary. No matter how close or far away that little girl is it is a painful thing to deal with.

The shooter is a responsible trained CCW owner. The bad guy is a reckless, dangerous BG with a deadly weapon on who knows what committing a felony right next to a mother and child. Forget about the money. The shooter was protecting innocent life. I bet he knew that.

A ricochet could have killed the child, the mother, the female clerk, the shooter, a guy across the street, or a person asleep in one of the rooms. If the clerk did not open fire or have a gun the BG could have killed whoever he wanted however he wanted.
cloud8a is offline  
Old June 8, 2009, 08:15 AM   #29
erwos
Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2009
Posts: 93
Well, assuming the angle isn't as bad as it looks, the only other thing I might complain about there is that it looks like he put a whole bunch of rounds through the glass. It might have been less than pleasant to be in that parking lot...
erwos is offline  
Old June 21, 2009, 10:26 PM   #30
hsccox
Member
 
Join Date: September 21, 2004
Posts: 21
Might, could, should, would,...Lordy .:barf:
hsccox is offline  
Old June 22, 2009, 08:47 AM   #31
johnwilliamson062
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 6,846
Legally:
Pretty sure that would be legal in my jurisdiction and in fact all of Ohio with very little question. I also question what happened to the baby's hearing, and the mothers. They were certainly in a location where the muzzle report would be very loud and they likely would not have "tunneled" like the shooter did, as they were likely unaware of what was going on.

Safety:
I have scanned through the links provided and have seen nowhere that the robber shot before the hotel employee, although some have claimed to see dust falling from the ceiling prior to the employee opening fire. If the robber did open fire, even into the ceiling I have absolutely no problem with the hotel employees actions.
Otherwise:
There was recently a video posted here with an instructor standing between two silhouettes taking pictures as his students did a live fire drill, a somewhat controlled circumstance. I would say he was as far from the vector of those shots as the baby was in this video. His behavior was universally condemned as being unsafe and generally idiotic.
In SD the need to shoot obviously far exceeds the need to shoot in a live fire exercise, but so do the preponderance of variables. What if the woman holding the baby, who I will assume has no training or experience, or at least any known to the shooter, had moved the wrong direction. Maybe they were "old buddies from Nam" and the shooter knew she had BTDT and would react correctly. Without the baby I would feel very comfortable with the way that unfolded. If he had moved to his right more drastically as he fired I would feel more comfortable, although this obviously introduces tripping and is going to make his shooting platform less stable.
I disagree with some others in that i believe that in a robbery such as this the perpetrator holding a gun does not necessarily mean you should take action. There are many cases where the robber has no intent to use the gun and there is no real reason in my mind to escalate it when there is a third party in between you and the shooter. Without the hotel employee firing in this case I very seriously doubt anyone would have been hurt and there would have been much less risk to the woman and baby, who I assume are his customers.

I find it very possible I would have done the some(or attempted to) in the same situation, but I probably would have thought, "wow, that was really dumb later." Split second decision his choices were certainly within the spectrum of reasonable and responsible. Like most things, he pulled it off, so he gets a pass on the shoot. I find some of the supposed shooters posts after the fact to be a little tasteless, especially his post with a link to the edited video, and for that I will judge him.
__________________
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. You could just donate to the Second Amendment Foundation
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread

Last edited by johnwilliamson062; June 22, 2009 at 08:54 AM.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06970 seconds with 7 queries