The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old May 17, 2009, 09:31 PM   #1
BobbyT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Posts: 266
16" shotgun + rifled barrel = no SBS issues?

Sorry if it's been covered, but I haven't come across it here. 16" requirement for rifles, 18" for smoothbores. So a 16" rifled shotgun should be fine right? No need to go the SBS route?

That would make things a little less unwieldy for a HD shotgun. Obviously buck wouldn't pattern as well, but if I remember correctly the Box o Truth experiments shots stayed within torso size at 12 yards, so at 10 or less it should do fine.
BobbyT is offline  
Old May 17, 2009, 10:09 PM   #2
rkba_net
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 26, 2000
Posts: 153
A "shotgun" (20ga, 12ga) with a RIFLED barrel less than 18" is a Destructive Device... since it has a bore > 0.5".... now on the other hand if you can find a .410 shotgun with a pistolgrip only and added a RIFLED barrel you would just have a handgun... the problem is I have NEVER seen a rifled .410 barrel.
rkba_net is offline  
Old May 17, 2009, 10:37 PM   #3
David Hineline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 1999
Location: South Sioux City, Nebraska
Posts: 703
Yes it would be a destructive device, unless you can get a sporting purpose exclusion from the ATF like 600 and 700 Nitro express and similar sporting rifles have even though they are over 50caliber bore.
David Hineline is offline  
Old May 17, 2009, 10:42 PM   #4
tmd11111
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Location: San Angelo, Tx
Posts: 275
Quote:
the problem is I have NEVER seen a rifled .410 barrel.
T/C Contender used to make a 14" .45lc/.410 barrel years ago. It had a rifled choke tube. I guess we could call that close but no cigar....
tmd11111 is offline  
Old May 17, 2009, 11:49 PM   #5
BobbyT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Posts: 266
Since shotguns are already established as "sporting", why would they be kicked back into the DD category?

I mean, all of the various configurations for the 870 don't need separate exceptions--the 870 and its >.50" barrel is a sporting shotgun.

When you go from a 28" to an 18" barrel, it's the same gun. When you put a rifled slug barrel on it, it's the same gun.

So with a 16" rifled barrel on it, are you guys then saying it becomes an "870 rifle" that hasn't been approved for sporting purposes? (Whereas with a 20-something inch rifled barrel it's still an "870 shotgun"?)
BobbyT is offline  
Old May 18, 2009, 09:36 AM   #6
M4Sherman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 408
Because you are claiming it as a rifle not a shotgun. so therefor you are changing its exemption status.
M4Sherman is offline  
Old May 18, 2009, 11:13 AM   #7
Magnum Wheel Man
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2006
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 8,175
Thompson Center makes a 16" rifled 45 Colt / 410 barrel with a "straight rifled" screw in choke tube, that screws in for use with the shot shells, & unscrews for use with 45 Colt...

I think it's listed as a rifle barrel for 45 Colt, so it's legal for shotgun use even though it's a 16' Barrel...

this is my Contender...



AFAIK... it's legal with nothing special
__________________
In life you either make dust or eat dust...
Magnum Wheel Man is offline  
Old May 18, 2009, 08:12 PM   #8
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 2,415
Quote:
Sorry if it's been covered, but I haven't come across it here. 16" requirement for rifles, 18" for smoothbores. So a 16" rifled shotgun should be fine right? No need to go the SBS route?
If that was the case, there would be 16" 870s for sale in your local gun store.
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old May 18, 2009, 09:29 PM   #9
BobbyT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Posts: 266
I assumed the rifled barrel would put people off. But I guess there'd still be HD versions selling.
BobbyT is offline  
Old May 18, 2009, 10:17 PM   #10
M4Sherman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 408
to the mate above with the .45 rifle. First AWESOME! Secondly yours is less than .50 so it is not a DD. So it is kinda irrelevant
M4Sherman is offline  
Old May 19, 2009, 12:39 AM   #11
David Hineline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 1999
Location: South Sioux City, Nebraska
Posts: 703
Yes if you tried to call the 16" rifled barrel a shotgun, then it would have to be a short barreled shotgun and still subject to NFA so you might as well call it a destructive device.
David Hineline is offline  
Old May 19, 2009, 03:43 AM   #12
tmd11111
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 26, 2009
Location: San Angelo, Tx
Posts: 275
The 14" T/C barrel I was refering to is for the handgun version. A friend had this set up years ago and we tried using it for quail hunting. Needless to say I couldn't hit water if I fell out of a boat with it. Actually we did bag a few birds but you had to take them within the first 10 yrds of flight. Hummmm.....This gives me an idea and reason to buy a Taurus Judge.
tmd11111 is offline  
Old May 19, 2009, 08:13 AM   #13
Csspecs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2005
Posts: 1,111
Sorry no easy way around it. Plus whats 2 inches anyway?
Csspecs is offline  
Old May 19, 2009, 05:44 PM   #14
Ridge_Runner_5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,863
Quote:
Sorry no easy way around it. Plus whats 2 inches anyway?
About a $250,000 fine and 10 years in the state pen...
Ridge_Runner_5 is offline  
Old May 20, 2009, 12:37 PM   #15
Johnny Guest
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,116
Or better still - -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridge_Runner_5
About a $250,000 fine and 10 years in the state pen...
I dunno about your state pen in Colorado, RR5. Me, I'd be more concerned with the FEDERAL pen than Texas state prison. The feds have nicer facilities, but there's little chance of early release by them.

Johnny
__________________
MOLON LABE!
Amendment II ensures the rest of the Bill of Rights.

Blog: Expert Witness
Johnny Guest is offline  
Old May 23, 2009, 01:24 AM   #16
f6d2o2shb2rywg
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 23, 2009
Posts: 1
Quote:
A "shotgun" (20ga, 12ga) with a RIFLED barrel less than 18" is a Destructive Device... since it has a bore > 0.5".... now on the other hand if you can find a .410 shotgun with a pistolgrip only and added a RIFLED barrel you would just have a handgun... the problem is I have NEVER seen a rifled .410 barrel.

Barrel length has nothing to do with whether it is considered a DD. And people use rifled slug gun barrels all the time with no legal trouble because they are considered "sporting" by the ATF.


Quote:
Yes it would be a destructive device, unless you can get a sporting purpose exclusion from the ATF like 600 and 700 Nitro express and similar sporting rifles have even though they are over 50caliber bore.

While the ATF's definition of sporting is somewhat arbitrary, they could never get away with claiming that an old double rifle in .600 Nitro Express was anything but.

Consider the .950 JDJ, which has a "sporting use" exemption.

Quote:


Because you are claiming it as a rifle not a shotgun. so therefor you are changing its exemption status.
No. You are making this up.


Bottom line: no need for SBS (or DD) paperwork if it isn't less than 16 inches.
f6d2o2shb2rywg is offline  
Old May 23, 2009, 06:17 PM   #17
Willie Lowman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2009
Location: Uh-Hi-O
Posts: 2,415
Quote:
Bottom line: no need for SBS (or DD) paperwork if it isn't less than 16 inches.
You really think that if this way around the ATF's definition of "Shotgun" would legally work? If it did Remington or Mossberg or any one of many others would have made one by now!

Show me a production (non NFA) 16" rifled barrel shotgun made by any of the major firearm companies.

It's ok, I'll wait...


...


...


...
Willie Lowman is offline  
Old May 24, 2009, 12:36 AM   #18
Johnny Guest
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: August 28, 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,116
Enough

If the barrel fits onto a conventional shotgun, it needs to be a minimum of 18 inches long to do without the federal tax stamp. If you doubt this, communicate with your nearest BATFE office. Or wrote to BATFE headquarters in D. C.

There's no sense in arguing the matter here on TFL. If common reasoning isn't enough, then you can get a written ruling from the feds.

CLOSED.
__________________
MOLON LABE!
Amendment II ensures the rest of the Bill of Rights.

Blog: Expert Witness
Johnny Guest is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.10002 seconds with 9 queries