The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old May 16, 2009, 09:25 AM   #1
Dust Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 723
A "Distraction Blow". What is this bull scat?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,520379,00.html

A distraction blow? Now I admit, I have been out of LE since 1998. In all the training I have received as a peace officer, never have I even heard of this term. If you have to use physical force, fine as long as you can justify it. From this article it seems this officer can read the subjects thoughts to know he is about to do something.

Me, well my BS detector is lighting up. The kick to the head is excessive force, plain and simple. This distraction blow crap is a neat way to CYA.

Now. I do not want this to become a bash all cops thread. Let's discuss this incident, this officers actions, and this "new" training method of the distraction blow.
__________________
Civilian Date: 14 Century
1 : a specialist in Roman or modern civil law.
If you are not subject to the UCMJ, you are a Civilian. I don't care one bit what updated dictionaries say.

Last edited by Dust Monkey; May 16, 2009 at 09:38 AM.
Dust Monkey is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 09:45 AM   #2
Dragon55
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 811
Yes, this definitely BS. If this officer is representative of the training he has received I can say it is very sad indeed. Obviously he only needed to place a knee in his back and cuff him. Crap like this is what makes it so hard on well trained police that do have a clue.
__________________
sailing ... A way to spend lots of money and go real S L O W
Dragon55 is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 09:58 AM   #3
vranasaurus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,175
You don't kick someone in the head to distract them and if he was trained that way that department needs to look at their policies and procedures.
vranasaurus is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 10:24 AM   #4
madmo44mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 879
My oldest daughter is a LEO and I sent this story to her.
I can't repeat what she said here but the drift is that any LEO that even though trained to do so is a complete idiot to use such tactics.
It's just not right and sets you and you're department up for a civil suite.
I do hope this jerk and his department gets sued.
I can see in some very remote situations where this tactic has merit but dam few, and this was not one of them.
__________________
Texas - Not just a state but an attitude!
For monthly shooting events in DFW visit http://www.meetup.com/TexasGunOwner-DFW
madmo44mag is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 11:00 AM   #5
Dust Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 723
From the article. A distraction blow is employed to prevent the suspect from doing something they were planning on doing. That just does not make sense. It sounds like mind reading police practice. Physical force is justified when a threat is eminent. A visible threat. Not a movement, I did not see a movement in the video to justify a kick to the head. All the officer had to do was detain at gun point until backup arrived, then cuff him. With my background and training in kuba baton and pr24, a strike to the head is a big NO NO.

I pray that this is not a new police tactic inserted in the use of force levels. If this is being taught, it's a sad day for LE. I can see kickng a suspect in the head if you are in eminent fear of your life or serious injury. But the officer had his weapon drawn. If in fear of his life, why not employ deadly force.

IMO this is a department in full CYA mode and playing "let's invent a new use of force " buzz word. Throw it on the wall and hope it sticks. I would like to see this go to court. But with the police investigating the police, it is not likely to happen.
__________________
Civilian Date: 14 Century
1 : a specialist in Roman or modern civil law.
If you are not subject to the UCMJ, you are a Civilian. I don't care one bit what updated dictionaries say.
Dust Monkey is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 08:00 PM   #6
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
I hope the P.O.S. (poor old subject) has a good dental plan.

DustMonkey,
I am hereby citing you for "Cop Bashing", son !


Hirlau is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 08:12 PM   #7
OuTcAsT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
I am hereby citing you for "Cop Bashing"
As opposed to what the LEO in the video did ?


Quote:
I hope the P.O.S. (poor old subject) has a good dental plan.
^ Excellent example of the "us vs. them" mentality^
And why a rift exists between LE and the public at large.
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood

Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska -
OuTcAsT is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 08:14 PM   #8
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
Exactly !
Hirlau is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 08:30 PM   #9
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
I've been trained in the past to deliver "distraction blows," the term used by the trainers, in a manner designed to facilitate the application of another physical technique.

As in:

1. Attempt technique unsuccessfully,
2. Deliver distraction blow.
3. Perform technique successfully.

I have seen individuals in the training environment utilize distraction blows outside of that parameter, subsequent to the application of pressure and the presence of adrenaline.

It is quite possible what we have here is a similar case. Distraction blows fall well short of one's "best shot," so the tale of the tape should substantiate, and likely did, the officer's claim. Has the footage been made available to the general public?

Now that said there's a difference between explainable and justifiable.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective
Erik is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 08:32 PM   #10
Gary L. Griffiths
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: On The Road, somewhere in the good ol' US of A.
Posts: 1,154
OK, let me get this straight: He kicked the suspect while he was lying on the ground unresisting under the rationale that he needed to distract him so he could 'cuff him?

I do happen to be an expert on police use of force, including deadly force, having taught these topics full time for the last fourteen years. (I'm listed in several expert witness databases.) In fact, just finished evaluating a case for a law firm in MN.

Somebody Puhleeze give the suspect's attorney my name and phone number! I would love to trash the defense's experts, if they can find any willing to testify.

Hint: Can we say, "End-of-Chase Syndrome?"
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own personal safety; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths, Chief Instructor, Advanced Force Tactics, Inc. (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill)
Gary L. Griffiths is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 08:52 PM   #11
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
Oh Gary, Puhleeze !

Now, you are gonna get a citation for "aiding" a subject who had no concern for human life around him. Alot of money to be made "on the Dark Side".



Why not "Pro Bono" your services to the officer's department. Teach them about, "End of Chase Syndrome"; as you put it .
Hirlau is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 08:52 PM   #12
birdshot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 17, 2008
Location: north platte nebraska
Posts: 305
distraction technique

try this; have someone hold arm out at shoulder height, palm down, now you try to push their arm down, they should be able to resist the movement.
now again have them hold arm out at shoulder height, palm down, but this time slap their other shoulder, as you begin the push of the extended arm.

in my limited martial arts training we were taught to always do a distraction technique before attempting a restraint manuever. nerve points were the recommended targets.
birdshot is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 09:40 PM   #13
Dust Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 723
What kind of move can you physically make to apprehend a suspect, with your weapon drawn and no backup around? Holding a felon at gunpoint, no back up around you, what do you need to distract from? You only need to keep holding said felon until backup arrives and arrest him. End of chase syndrome, you bet. POPO. You bet.

Hirlau,

Please take those posters you cut and paste, your "cops do no wrong" attitude back over to coptalk. We like to have adult, real world discussions here. This is not bashing cops. This is one officer who IMO went a giant leap over the line and used excessive force. I wont even begin to discuss if this is actually being taught as this officer used it.

I can see using a strike or blow as a means to an end. Strike to diaphram to knock the breath out of someone so you can place them on the ground and cuff them. That does not apply here. Employing hand to hand combat with your side arm drawn is not a healthy thing, for you not the suspect.

Their are techniques for arresting a violent person by yourself, I have been trained on and taught others as well. Funny thing. None involved kicks to the head (or any kick to the body) with you gun out of it's holster.
__________________
Civilian Date: 14 Century
1 : a specialist in Roman or modern civil law.
If you are not subject to the UCMJ, you are a Civilian. I don't care one bit what updated dictionaries say.
Dust Monkey is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 09:52 PM   #14
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
Quote, " We like to have adult, real world discussions here."

Not when your OP is so drenched in "bias' my friend, humor is all this thread deserves.

OP quote; "Now. I do not want this to become a bash all cops thread"

You knew from the beginning where this was going.
Hirlau is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 10:15 PM   #15
Dust Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 723
Unhitch your blue wagons. The only officer and their actions Being discussed is the officer who was taped kicking a compliant suspect in the head. No one is bashing LE. See this is why I left coptalk. Infants over there can not take questions and critisims about wrong doing on the cops part. Your post above about the suspect hopefully having a dental plan is bashing. It's bashing citizens, even the criminals need their rights protected. You should have been taught that as a rookie.

Now back to the discussion. Any police trainers want to chime in here. Opine on this. ?
__________________
Civilian Date: 14 Century
1 : a specialist in Roman or modern civil law.
If you are not subject to the UCMJ, you are a Civilian. I don't care one bit what updated dictionaries say.

Last edited by Dust Monkey; May 16, 2009 at 10:34 PM.
Dust Monkey is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 10:23 PM   #16
sholling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 1999
Location: Hemet (middle of nowhere) California
Posts: 4,254
Quote:
Not when your OP is so drenched in "bias' my friend, humor is all this thread deserves.
The only one I see with a huge bias is you my friend. You have the same attitude the LAPD has - a cop can do no wrong. I think you can now count your credibility as zero. I've seen the tape and this was a blatant case of felony assault under color of authority.

Per SOP LAPD will circle the wagons. Plan A was probably to say that the suspect attacked the officer's shoe with his face, but since the video ruled that out they went to Plan B - it was a distraction blow. The next step is that LAPD will issue a ruling that the blow was within policy. At that point they will hope the case just goes away. Most of the time the DA follows a gentleman's agreement not to prosecute officers so it probably will just go away. But if the DA is backed into a corner by publicity and forced to file charges he/she will simply neglect to offer any evidence at the trail and blame "brain damaged jurors" - the officer walks and returns to the job - SOP.

I personally feel that the officer should be terminated and should be allowed to plead guilty to misdemeanor battery charges and accept a few years of probation. However I'd settle for a 30 day unpaid suspension and loss of all rank - if and only if there were no previous incidents.
__________________
Proud Life Member: National Rifle Association, California Rifle & Pistol Association, and the Second Amendment Foundation.
Annual Member: Revolutionary War Veterans Association (Project Appleseed) and the Madison Society.
sholling is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 10:27 PM   #17
madmo44mag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2008
Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 879
Quote:
Now that said there's a difference between explainable and justifiable.
Exactly and when watching this video the action "Does Not APPEAR" to be justified.

It can also be a matter of time on the force.
Younger officers has less experience and perceive a threat when there may not be one or the threat can be neutralized in another fashion.
__________________
Texas - Not just a state but an attitude!
For monthly shooting events in DFW visit http://www.meetup.com/TexasGunOwner-DFW
madmo44mag is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 10:32 PM   #18
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
Quote; "See this is why I left coptalk. Infants over there can not take questions and critisims about went doing on the cops part. "

This confirms it all, maybe your not a cop basher; just a cop hater.

Why would any experienced officer want to have a discussion with you? They will never change your attitude or convince you of their actions.

In closing; everybody who watched that video ( citizens and LEO'S...me included) knows the officer was wrong, made a bad mistake. What never ceases to amaze me is people like you, who after seeing a mistake made by an officer; jump to the aid of the P.O.S. (poor old subject ). Suddenly the actions of the P.O.S. are out-weighted by the single kick to the head.

You are not interested in the lack of training in todays law enforcement; the main reason for this incident.
Hirlau is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 10:36 PM   #19
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
Hey sholling,
How many times have you been in the back of a cruiser?
Hirlau is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 11:19 PM   #20
OuTcAsT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
In closing; everybody who watched that video ( citizens and LEO'S...me included) knows the officer was wrong, made a bad mistake. What never ceases to amaze me is people like you, who after seeing a mistake made by an officer; jump to the aid of the P.O.S. (poor old subject ). Suddenly the actions of the P.O.S. are out-weighted by the single kick to the head.
This is absolutely one of the most "biased" quotes I have ever seen. Since I have been here at TFL I have read posts by many of our LE members and, have come to respect most of them as they seem to be rational, and professional. I have even had debates over LE tactics with them and we all left the table with a bit more than we came with. It is a shame when an exception pops up and tarnishes the good will, and mutual respect, that is commonly found here.

Do you honestly think that anyone is so naive as to not know what your "POS" comment implies?

As far as the "subjects" actions being outweighed by a "single kick to the head" Pardon me if I expect a Law Enforcement Officer to act a bit more professional than a street thug.

I have never visited the Coptalk forum but, if it is as full of machismo (among other things) as your posts are, then perhaps you would be more comfortable amongst your peers.

LE Bashing is not tolerated here, at least I have not seen it in the years I have been a part of this community. But, pointing out a particular Bad incident ( you even admitted it yourself ) occurs, It is only bashing the moron who made the head kick.
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood

Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska -

Last edited by OuTcAsT; May 16, 2009 at 11:24 PM. Reason: not stooping to that level.
OuTcAsT is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 11:21 PM   #21
Dust Monkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 723
Quote:
Why would any experienced officer want to have a discussion with you? They will never change your attitude or convince you of their actions.
I was in LE, and very expedrienced at that. I do not hate cops, have many cop friends. I also have been used as an expert witness at trials where small arms are concerned. And no my attitude will never change about what actions and use of force is right and what is criminally wrong.

Quote:
What never ceases to amaze me is people like you, who after seeing a mistake made by an officer; jump to the aid of the P.O.S. (poor old subject ). Suddenly the actions of the P.O.S. are out-weighted by the single kick to the head.

I hate the "cops can do no wrong" ideology. And yes, I come to the defense of the, as you say, POS suspect. You as a cop are charged with protecting the POS's rights as well. That is fact. Just because the suspect has committed a crime, just shot someone, or what ever, he still has rights. Did you miss that lecture in the academy, out sick. Just because a person is being pursued as a criminal, and caught, does not mean you can ignore his rights. Nothing is out-weighted. Just because the POS committed a crime, does not mean you get a "free" shot at him. Thats militant thinking, vigilante attitude. Like, you made me do my job I applied for, you made me run after you, so I feel I get to kick you. It does not work that way. If you think it does, please quit LE now, you dont have what it takes to safely patrol and protect citizens.
__________________
Civilian Date: 14 Century
1 : a specialist in Roman or modern civil law.
If you are not subject to the UCMJ, you are a Civilian. I don't care one bit what updated dictionaries say.
Dust Monkey is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 11:35 PM   #22
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
As you wish. OutCast.

You now get one for "Senseless Ranting"

Hirlau is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 11:36 PM   #23
OuTcAsT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
You are not interested in the lack of training in todays law enforcement; the main reason for this incident.
Question Hirlau, Do you feel that you have a lack of training ?
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood

Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska -
OuTcAsT is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 11:42 PM   #24
OuTcAsT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,134
...deleted....
__________________
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood

Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska -

Last edited by OuTcAsT; May 16, 2009 at 11:51 PM. Reason: double tap
OuTcAsT is offline  
Old May 16, 2009, 11:44 PM   #25
Hirlau
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 296
Yes, I do; in some areas of law enforcement.
But considering the fact that I'm retired and finding a breakfast location each day is my only task; I probably won't be supplementing my "Training File" anytime soon.
Hirlau is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.14912 seconds with 7 queries