The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 13, 2009, 08:26 PM   #1
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
4 years of action

Based on recent reports of the back-down by Democrats and Liberals from the Assault Weapon Ban because of the obvious political suicide that it would be, I see it that we have less than 4 years to change the general public's view of gun ownership and rights before the attack can take place at full force later down the road.

We can either get banned by congress with the public's approval, get banned against the public's approval, or nor not get banned with full civilian approval. Only one of those options is a risk to us, because if we have the general public's opinion in our favor, then we do not need to fear a lasting or placed objection to our 2nd amendment rights.

As has been stated in previous threads, this is not our opportunity to "chill out". We need to take this time that we've been given to alter the general public opinion that guns are bad, that guns only lead to negative concequences, and that once we get rid of guns all will be good in the world.

We have less than 4 years to equate gun ownership with personal empowerment; we have less than 4 years to equate concealed carry with absolute protection; and we have less than 4 years to equate the concept of the gun with Americana/Irrevocable rights/Patriotism, and make sure that every citizen equates it with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

I want to know what kinds of programs, events, parties, legislation, etc that we're willing to hit the roads with to ensure that the next four years ensures that we never have to fight for this right again.

I want the 2nd amendment right to become an inevitable and unavoidable right, something that we can finalize as done, agreed upon, and stamped into gold as an irrevocable truth and right of American citizens.

We can do a lot in 4 years, and if we take this seriously, then this may be our only and last 4 years to work within. We cannot rest or hiccup here, this is happening in real time. We don't have a buffer or the ability to experiment. The time; the only time we are afforded; is now.

So what do we do, what should we do and what can we do? What is your feedback, and CAN WE DO IT?

My response? Yes we can!
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 07:03 PM   #2
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
I have to admit I am VERY surprised not to see conversation taking place here. Well, okay. I'll start.

As I see it, our first order of business is to negate the power of the phrase "assault weapon". No one knows what it means who's against it, but it sounds scary and assault is a crime, so of course they should outlaw something that sounds like it should obviously already be illegal. We should be writing the NRA to invest in advertisements which debunk the phrase.

If the NRA or other lobby groups do not want to foot the bill, than we start a non-profit and foot it ourselves.

Directly related, our second order of business is to explain the difference between full auto and semi auto, and educate in how the phrases are used, especially in handguns which are sometimes called "autos".

Our third order of business is to make it our priority to reach out to our anti-gun friends to "give it a shot". Take them to the range, go through an EXTENSIVE safety course, not only because you should anyway, but so they see how "play time got checked at the door", and that "fun" and "responsibility" make for a great marriage.

I won't suggest this as an order of business, but I have an opinion here that I would like to get some response to. I think that we need to embrace some regulation. I personally believe that what I've seen of the Maine system needs some serious attention. Not only will it help clean up some loopholes, and pick up the sagging on things we may consider pretty common sense, but it will show that we support change, but change in a different direction.

Additionally, I think we need to push for a Federal Concealed Carry Permit which allows you to carry in every state, in every town, in every building, across the board. Zero restrictions. I think it should be a lot of work to get one, but once you do, you should be allowed to carry everywhere you're allowed to go unarmed. It should not be expensive. It should require regular updating. But most importantly, it should be designed to WORK, so if some FCC holder gets a restraining order against him and is quoted in police transcript saying "Ill kill you!" that flags the guy BEFORE he does it and ends up on the front page.

I really hope you guys start posting and discussing here. We need to come up with a strategy, not cross our fingers for four years or however long you think it'll be before the subject hits congress and argue our regrets away once it passes.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 08:22 PM   #3
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Blue Grass, IA
Posts: 8,551
Quote:
I have to admit I am VERY surprised not to see conversation taking place here.
I read it yesterday and to be honest I was a bit gunshy to respond since it felt like it had political overtones to it.

Quote:
As I see it, our first order of business is to negate the power of the phrase "assault weapon".
I piped up and openly griped about this by starting a thread of my own about the same subject. It didn't go over all that great. I was surprised to see quite a few apathetic responses.

Quote:
I think that we need to embrace some regulation.
What regulations do you support?
Quote:
Additionally, I think we need to push for a Federal Concealed Carry Permit which allows you to carry in every state, in every town, in every building, across the board.
I disagree. States should not be told what to do in this sense. The states should set the laws within reason without federal interference. There are exceptions, but to make a sweeping change like this all at once and to make all 50 states abide by this isn't right, IMO.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language.

Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 08:44 PM   #4
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
Well, it is political isn't it? It's politics that is threatening our 2nd amendment right, or at least threatening to threaten it. Was it the opening sentence about Democrats and liberals? I'm registered as a Democrat, voted for Obama, and have some pretty liberal viewpoints. It wasn't meant to be a slam against them, it's just those are the people pushing this legislation.

Quote:
I piped up and openly griped about this by starting a thread of my own about the same subject. It didn't go over all that great. I was surprised to see quite a few apathetic responses.
I don't accept apathy as an acceptable response. I see this apparent "back burner"-ing of the issue as an opportunity that we cannot pass up.

Quote:
What regulations do you support?
I am open to debating it, and what I support I would call "a work in progress". My opinions are already being (positively) shaped by having some engaging conversations here, as this forum is the first time I've had access to people with completely opposing viewpoints that actively engaged in friendly conversation and I love it.

That said, I think that you should either have to pass a basic safety class to own a firearm, OR should have been taught safety by a family member. A simple "yes, I taught him and hes safe" style letter, handwritten if you want, signed in witness of a licensed official and that would sit in place of whatever certificate of safety course completion that would otherwise be required.

I don't understand why some states have open carry free of legislation but those same states make you jump through hoops and pay high fees to conceal carry.

For states that require a class, such as Maine, to apply for a CCP, that class should actually teach you something, and not simply meet requirements. My class left quite a bit to be desired, and I still know pretty much nothing about some pretty important issues. I plan on taking a two day 10 hour long course which includes live fire at my gun range. The class I took was two hours long and mostly consisted of a guided tour of filling out paperwork.

Quote:
I disagree. States should not be told what to do in this sense. The states should set the laws within reason without federal interference. There are exceptions, but to make a sweeping change like this all at once and to make all 50 states abide by this isn't right, IMO.
Just like I see the thinking behind anti-nationalized medicine (and have been swayed), I see your point. There should be a different approach, perhaps, but I don't think that to carry throughout the USA should cost you thousands of dollars a year (don't know the actual amount, but it's not even possible anyway I don't think, as Maine appears to be residential only, so if you're not a resident, I do not think you can carry here). And I don't think that a place like a Mall has a right to ban your right to carry if you are capable of doing so safely. I don't like the fact that an uninformed store owner can say that I can't go into their store. I respect their right to be anti-gun, but my idea of a federal concealed carry permit would put you up there with law enforcement in that regard, that you are above-and-beyond qualified.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 09:40 PM   #5
azredhawk44
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2005
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 6,465
Quote:
I think that we need to embrace some regulation. I personally believe that what I've seen of the Maine system needs some serious attention. Not only will it help clean up some loopholes, and pick up the sagging on things we may consider pretty common sense, but it will show that we support change, but change in a different direction.
I'm not interested in any more regulation. No, thank you.

Quote:
I'm registered as a Democrat, voted for Obama, and have some pretty liberal viewpoints.
You come across to me like a "fifth columnist." You voted for the guy and party that wants our guns, then come here and tell us to initiate the compromise process so that we lose even more than if we dig in our heels and fight for all that's dear and holy.

No thank you.

I'll not be playing your game.

Quote:
That said, I think that you should either have to pass a basic safety class to own a firearm, OR should have been taught safety by a family member.
Open to Jim-Crow-style abuse, nepotism, or abusive bureaucratic procedures to inhibit an inalienable right. No.


Quote:
Additionally, I think we need to push for a Federal Concealed Carry Permit which allows you to carry in every state, in every town, in every building, across the board.
So that my Arizona one, perfectly secure in the AZ political climate, can be repealed under Federal Supremacy? So that "one of the parties" can decide to rescind that one across the nation rather than fight 40+ states individually?

No. There's already too much Federal concentration of power. No more. In fact, how about cutting Federal power to 10% of its current level, along with taxes? (Obviously not gun related, but considerably more sensible).

It lives under a bridge, folks...
azredhawk44 is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 09:48 PM   #6
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Blue Grass, IA
Posts: 8,551
Quote:
Well, it is political isn't it? It's politics that is threatening our 2nd amendment right, or at least threatening to threaten it. Was it the opening sentence about Democrats and liberals? I'm registered as a Democrat, voted for Obama, and have some pretty liberal viewpoints. It wasn't meant to be a slam against them, it's just those are the people pushing this legislation.
If the thread is to be politically focused, I must bow out. We're allowed to discuss legal and civil rights, but we cannot engage in political discussion. It doesn't have to do with me wanting to, because I do. It has to do with the forum rules.

Quote:
I don't accept apathy as an acceptable response.
I don't accept it as an answer either personally. But the reality is people are apathetic to the use of the term. The only thing you can do is discuss the debate here, contact your local congressman, and don't give in to using the term when it isn't warranted.

Quote:
That said, I think that you should either have to pass a basic safety class to own a firearm, OR should have been taught safety by a family member. A simple "yes, I taught him and hes safe" style letter, handwritten if you want, signed in witness of a licensed official and that would sit in place of whatever certificate of safety course completion that would otherwise be required.
IMO, this would be about as useful as your parent handing out your drivers license.

Quote:
And I don't think that a place like a Mall has a right to ban your right to carry if you are capable of doing so safely. I don't like the fact that an uninformed store owner can say that I can't go into their store. I respect their right to be anti-gun, but my idea of a federal concealed carry permit would put you up there with law enforcement in that regard, that you are above-and-beyond qualified.
A place of business is the same as your own home. It's the business owner's private property. He(or she. I use he as a generic prose so I don't have to say he/she every time) has the right to impose whatever rules they want. I also have the right to shop elsewhere if I don't like his rules.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language.

Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 09:55 PM   #7
B.H.
Junior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2009
Posts: 7
I don't think that we need anymore regulations. We already have enough laws on the books which are hardly enforced. We don't need any more feel good legislation.

I don't think that they need any federal right to carry license. A great deal of states already have ccw and they have reciprocity with other states that recognize each others permits. There are some states out there that dont recognize other states permits but they should.

As far as the term "assault weapon" well that is any weapon that is used to assault someone. The media likes to use terminology that is misleading so they can frighten all the sheeple out there.
B.H. is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 10:01 PM   #8
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
I agree that "new" regulation sound scary. A week ago I was for nationalized health care and now I'm not so certain. I actually love a response like yours because it makes me think of things differently, which is exactly what I am looking for personally.

I think some of the regulation on the books is horrible. Most should be repealed and discarded. Some should be reworded, and some should be put on the books that isn't already there.

Even that is open to debate. I've changed my mind on so much based on sane arguments here, and that's my entire point. I want to get conversation to that point, where we can debate and agree to some sort of conclusion, then fight for those rights.

I'm not sure what a fifth columnest is but I am not here on any special program or situation. I do understand wondering why I'd vote for a guy whos threatened to take away one of my most important rights, but as I've said in previous threads; I do believe that our voices can be loud enough to influence our president; that we have the power to "change his mind".

I recognize that abuse can happen and I am open to suggested alternatives. I hold no fever induced notions that I have the best ideas out there. I simply see a lack of leadership to move towards the best alternative and have decided to take to heading the voice and opening the wings. I hope that an entirely more educated person bumps be down and takes over, I am NO ONE. I have some half caked ideas and I beg that someone more informed takes over and helps our community. My entire goal of this thread is to get a better leader to step forward.

I do not want any federal ccp to overpower locally entrusted permits. I see it as a "level two" kind of permit. Only if you want it, and it lets you do the whole country. I do not at all think it should affect any current programs.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 10:16 PM   #9
Al Norris
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jofaba
I think we need to push for a Federal Concealed Carry Permit which allows you to carry in every state, ...
We may travel from State to State, without having any other drivers license because the States themselves arranged for reciprocity agreements.

The Feds had nothing whatsoever to do with it. Why? There is nothing within the constitution that gives the Feds any such police power. Not even the Interstate Commerce Clause works at this level. Don't confuse individual licensing with commercial licensing... That the Feds can and do regulate.

So it is with concealed carry permits. Individual reciprocity agreements between the States are at work, in exactly the same manner. Yet, because it is guns and not automobiles, there are and will be differences.
Quote:
I think that we need to embrace some regulation.
What more regulation do we need? Firearms are already heavily regulated by both the Feds and the States (and in many States, the local city and/or county).
Quote:
I don't understand why some states have open carry free of legislation but those same states make you jump through hoops and pay high fees to conceal carry.
Which States are you talking about? I know it isn't Idaho, Montana, Wyoming or Arizona. We are open carry States and we have some of the most lenient concealed carry laws there are (Vermont and Alaska excepted).

As for actually answering your question, I can't. Not without a long dissertation on why and how concealed firearms were met first with public derision, then with legislative and judicial disdain. It's a history of highwaymen; Duels; Gamblers and such.

Given that the Bad Guys still carry concealed, it's no wonder that the States want to make sure you are in fact a law abiding citizen before they issue you your permit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuttle8
I read it yesterday and to be honest I was a bit gunshy to respond since it felt like it had political overtones to it.
Absolutely it is political. But it is calling for activism, which is perhaps the only real political thread that can survive in this forum (See my notes in this sticky).

I may have more comments, later on.
__________________
National listings of the Current 2A Cases.
Al Norris is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 10:28 PM   #10
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
I may be calling to arms on this subject as the originator, but I am more than willing to pass this on to a more willing leader given the opportunity.

But we do have an opportunity here. I feel that I can help us push towards a point, but there are probably better men out there with better ideas who can move us forward. Someone needs to lead us though, and we need to be active and know that our opinions are taken into account. Whoever moves us forward has to be for us and work for us. We have perhaps 4 years. We can't mess around. Someone take up the code of arms and command the spirit, or I will.

We have a real job here; this isn't some statement to be dropped a week later like an old thread that's lost interest. This is about our rights, our lives, this isn't a joke.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 10:43 PM   #11
roy reali
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
4 Years?

We actually have two years. That is if the GOP can wise up. But don't hold your breath on it!
roy reali is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 10:46 PM   #12
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
I say 4 years because that is presidential time.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 10:57 PM   #13
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Blue Grass, IA
Posts: 8,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antipitas
Absolutely it is political. But it is calling for activism, which is perhaps the only real political thread that can survive in this forum (See my notes in this sticky).
And I fully understand your sticky. My point being is with the overtone of political nature, I tend to stand aside for a while until other members chime in. I want to make sure that the discussion remains within the set rules before I jump in. In the past, I've had a bad habit of being an early participant of drifting threads off-topic involving political discussion. I found that if I read the OP and spend more time thinking an less time typing off the bat, I keep myself out of trouble.

Quote:
I do not want any federal ccp to overpower locally entrusted permits. I see it as a "level two" kind of permit. Only if you want it, and it lets you do the whole country. I do not at all think it should affect any current programs.
If you want a type of "level two" permit, how is this really valid if the intent isn't to affect any current program? If a state doesn't have CCW, like Illinois, how does the "level two" federal permit hold water in that state without affecting their program?
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language.

Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 10:59 PM   #14
roy reali
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2005
Posts: 3,248
So!

If the GOP could take control of congress, the point about the president is moot. As I said earlier, don't count these chickens before they hatch.
roy reali is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 11:06 PM   #15
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
I think that every state should have a ccw permit and if they don't, I see that as proof that a federal all-around permit right should exist.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 14, 2009, 11:36 PM   #16
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Blue Grass, IA
Posts: 8,551
Quote:
I think that every state should have a ccw permit and if they don't, I see that as proof that a federal all-around permit right should exist.
But now you're back to having federal laws overriding state laws. Take a gander at the Constitution....
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language.

Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 05:31 AM   #17
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
Quote:
But now you're back to having federal laws overriding state laws. Take a gander at the Constitution....
Yes, it is a conundrum. Before I make another comment on it I think that I should reread the constitution and rearrange my program. It is easy to think you've got the best answer to a question but the constitution and the BOR is the core of our country and should be what guides us to the best answer, never something to bump against and try to twist for your own means.

EDIT: rereading this thread makes this post sound, at least to my early morning groggy mind, that I'm just swinging for the benches with a brand new bat.

What I mean by it, is that I entirely believe in the constitution and the bill of rights, and wouldn't want a "good intentions" idea to run against their grain. The BOR is designed to be amended and you can argue about how good/bad that is (it took away then gave us back liquor, you can stand on either side of that debate), but I think that it is perfectly worded in this case, I believe.

It is open for interpretation of course, those damn pesky commas, but that's why we have the judicial system.

Last edited by Jofaba; April 15, 2009 at 06:02 AM.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 09:36 AM   #18
johnwilliamson062
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 6,788
Introduce new people to shooting. It is really that simple. The VAST majority of anti-gun people I have met have never fired a gun.
__________________
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. You could just donate to the Second Amendment Foundation
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 10:33 AM   #19
cracked91
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 17, 2009
Posts: 385
Well, its four years to stock up on as many soon-to-be-illegal weapons as you can
cracked91 is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 10:46 AM   #20
JWT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Introduce new people to shooting. It is really that simple. The VAST majority of anti-gun people I have met have never fired a gun.
Excellent idea. In the past week I had the opportunity to help introduce two women to shooting. Neither had ever fired a gun and both indicated an interest to try it just to see if they liked it. Spent an hour or so discussing safety and then took them to a local range. Both ladies enjoyed the experience and will likely take a formal basic handgun course and then decide if they want to get more 'involved' in shooting.

If they do, they'll almost certainly introduce their friends to shooting and in the process change how they view 'guns'.
JWT is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 06:28 PM   #21
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
Perhaps we need to look at what's been working to build support against gun rights. Lobby funded commercials, news station hour long "specials" with an obvious bias, and political responses to gun related tragedies. Add to this list, it's all I can think of right now as a launch point.

On a low funded personal level, I agree and said in my first post, getting anti-gun friends and family members to the range is the easiest and even funnest way to start turning the tide. One trip alone doesn't do it though. I brought my dad to the range and while he enjoyed himself, hes completely against me carrying. I've only been able to bring him once, so I've got some work on my hands. He's going to be a hard convert and I'll learn from that experience and share whether it's worked in the long run.

Once you get that friend or family member educated, and they've "seen the light", we need to get their friends and family members lined up for the next trip to the range.

Skeet/Trap might be a good group intro because it's a sport, it's fun, you can do it with a lot of people, and it carries a familiar competative edge that may be easier to ease the uninitiated into than target shooting. It turns "years long honed skill" into "learning curve".

Does anyone here have a clue what the NRA is up to internally? I'm a very new member and don't know what their program is like in regards to media and advertisement. Their statements are usually a little awkward and defensive. Are they putting together any decent media to launch online and on television to try and start removing the stigma associated with guns?

Marketing is very important. Every product that does well is marketed well. Ever service that does well is marketed well. Who'd have thought that an animated gecko with a British accent would make car insurance so much fun?

I know it may leave a bad taste in some people's mouths, but we need to start marketing the 2nd amendment. I don't mean commercialize it, I mean making sure that people understand that it exists, that it's not outdated, that it's something to believe in, protect, and exercise daily. We need actively retrain what happens to people's brains when they think of the 2nd amendment.

The 2nd amendment is a brand of America. That's what we need to drive home, but even then it's just a statement and one that sounds like legal mumbo jumbo because people interpret it so drastically different depending on their own bias. We need to develop a message that connects, juice it with the personal touch of introducing friends and families, and the friends and families of those, to the sport and right of shooting and personal protection.

We also need to educate ourselves about events where private gun ownership saved lives. We need to know local events and more well known national events. Concealed and open carry has probably the highest stigma associated with it.

Last edited by Jofaba; April 15, 2009 at 06:36 PM.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 07:56 PM   #22
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Blue Grass, IA
Posts: 8,551
Quote:
Perhaps we need to look at what's been working to build support against gun rights.
Please don't take offense to this, Jofaba for it will probably label you in this crowd and I apologize in advance:

1.The elite media in general has been one of the biggest supporters against gun rights. Look no further than NBC and the top two head honchos that run it for example. Head over to the editorial section of New York Times, online at DailyKos.

2. The general public either got sucked in or was blatently supportive of Obama. Now, we're starting to see what damage his administration can and will do.

3. The current judicial branch legislating from the bench IMO is the most destructive of all. It's difficult, if not almost impossible to do much about the problem swiftly. Have a problem with the current elected official? No problem. Vote the person out. Have a problem with a judge? Forget it. Deal with whatever the opinion the court states. One of the only active changes I've seen is either the judge dies or retires.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language.

Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 08:06 PM   #23
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
I see nothing to take offense to.

Your points are valid but do not point towards anything we can do to prevent or kill this concept of gun control. I am no trying to negate your post, but you need to offer a solution, not just present problems.
Jofaba is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 08:14 PM   #24
Shane Tuttle
Staff
 
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Blue Grass, IA
Posts: 8,551
Quote:
I see nothing to take offense to.
The fact you voted for Obama and now we're having to deal with his administration....

Quote:
Your points are valid but do not point towards anything we can do to prevent or kill this concept of gun control.
You suggested to look at what's been working to build support against gun rights. I provided said examples, that's all.

Quote:
I am no trying to negate your post, but you need to offer a solution, not just present problems.
I did offer solutions. Especially ones that you haven't instilled yet.
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language.

Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Shane Tuttle is offline  
Old April 15, 2009, 08:25 PM   #25
Jofaba
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2009
Posts: 322
I'm sorry but I re-read this:

Quote:
rights.
Please don't take offense to this, Jofaba for it will probably label you in this crowd and I apologize in advance:

1.The elite media in general has been one of the biggest supporters against gun rights. Look no further than NBC and the top two head honchos that run it for example. Head over to the editorial section of New York Times, online at DailyKos.

2. The general public either got sucked in or was blatently supportive of Obama. Now, we're starting to see what damage his administration can and will do.

3. The current judicial branch legislating from the bench IMO is the most destructive of all. It's difficult, if not almost impossible to do much about the problem swiftly. Have a problem with the current elected official? No problem. Vote the person out. Have a problem with a judge? Forget it. Deal with whatever the opinion the court states. One of the only active changes I've seen is either the judge dies or retires.
and the only suggested solution was to "vote them out". i

I don't disagree with that, but there is a ton of work and preparation between saying it and making it happen.
Jofaba is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.15362 seconds with 7 queries