The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 15, 2009, 07:33 PM   #26
BillCA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, Ca
Posts: 7,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildAlaska
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillCA
The fact that Reid didn't support the AWB and didn't vote to resurrect it only reflects his desire to stay in office, not any idealogical or philisophical stance in support of the 2A right.
So what?

WildisanypoliticodifferentAlaska
Yes, I think so.

If a vote for a gun ban comes up, those politicians who actually support gun ownership from an idealogical standpoint would oppose it on principle. Unlike Reid who, if he couldn't vote for it, would not actively oppose it.

Votes do count, but for people like Reid who may face a very strong opponent or decide to retire, we lose our leverage. With no leverage and no consequences for a yes vote, Reid would certainly support his party line on a gun ban.

It is best to have friends in congress whose feet we don't have to put to the fire get support our rights.
__________________
BillCA in CA (Unfortunately)
BillCA is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05628 seconds with 7 queries