The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The North Corral > Black Powder and Cowboy Action Shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 1, 2009, 09:23 AM   #1
chief
Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 29
what do you recommend for a replica?

Hi all, I'm looking to get a 1860's Colt Army and a 1858 Remignton.. I've been reading up alot on umberti and pietta, any experience with any of these?

Thx in advance.
chief is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 09:32 AM   #2
gwnorth
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 3, 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 692
So is a current Colt SA Army too expensive? Just saying if I wanted a Colt Army, I would want the real deal, since they still make them to the same specifications. But they are pricey.

Of the two you mention, I have fired a few friends Umberti's and they seem pretty well made, but I can't claim to have a lot of experience with them.
gwnorth is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 09:36 AM   #3
chief
Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 29
yes to expensive, I'm looking to spend 4-$600 MAX
chief is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 10:12 AM   #4
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 35,694
We have a blackpowder forum, so I'm going to move this there.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 10:25 AM   #5
Hawg Haggen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,639
I've got a Pietta 60 Army and a 58 Remington. Great guns. I have two Uberti SAA's and the fit and finish on them isn't any better than the Pietta C&B. Not as good on one.
Hawg Haggen is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 10:28 AM   #6
Hawg Haggen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,639
Quote:
So is a current Colt SA Army too expensive? Just saying if I wanted a Colt Army, I would want the real deal, since they still make them to the same specifications. But they are pricey.
He said 60 Colt, not SAA. Third gen. 60's weren't made by Colt, just licensed by them.
Hawg Haggen is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 10:41 AM   #7
chief
Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 29
Sorry about that Mike, I keep posting in the wrong forum...



if any of you have pics of your own pls post..
chief is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 11:10 AM   #8
Hawg Haggen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,639
I imagine folks hereabouts are tired of seeing my pics.

Pietta 60 Colt



Pietta 58 Remington. I bought this one used is why it has a drag line from the hammer being let down from half cock. I've since bought a new cylinder but haven't updated my pic.

Hawg Haggen is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 11:27 AM   #9
chief
Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2009
Posts: 29
Very nice Hawg..

if you dont mind me asking how much you pay for a used '58?
chief is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 11:55 AM   #10
w_houle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2007
Location: Junction City, KS
Posts: 1,389
The cylinder for the Pietta is the longest for all of the 1860s (as well as 1851s), so I would go with it. Not sure about the remmys though. If you get a cartridge conversion for it you will find that the pietta will take the longest OAL, although mine doesnt like factory .45 Colt OAL of 1.6", but does .45 Schofield just fine, as i imagine all the other ones would too.
__________________
How could you have a slogan like "freedom is slavery" when the concept of freedom has been abolished?
w_houle is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 12:14 PM   #11
Hawg Haggen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,639
I paid 135.00 for that one last year with two holsters.

Hawg Haggen is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 12:32 PM   #12
w_houle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2007
Location: Junction City, KS
Posts: 1,389

Oh come on, you know you want a '51
__________________
How could you have a slogan like "freedom is slavery" when the concept of freedom has been abolished?
w_houle is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 12:42 PM   #13
Hawg Haggen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,639
I almost bought a 51 when I bought my 60 but I was already set up to cast balls for the .44 and I'm not real sure I'm gonna like a .36. My next one will most likely be a 51 tho.
Hawg Haggen is offline  
Old March 1, 2009, 01:02 PM   #14
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,843
Quote Chief
Quote:
Hi all, I'm looking to get a 1860's Colt Army and a 1858 Remignton.. I've been reading up alot on umberti and pietta, any experience with any of these?

Thx in advance.
I've had some, and got some of each; although I don't have Remmies anymore. Old ones and new ones. Quality of Pietta vs Uberti is about even over all. They both have their good points and not so good (wouldn't really call them bad) points. I personally like the grip profile of the Uberti's over the Piettas. I think the Pietta grips are a little too trumpet mouthed at the base * the Ubertis are more like the originals. I like the polish and blue on the Ubertis; but the Piettas have better case colors. Functionally, they generally are good out of the box and both are fairly easy to tune up.

With all that said, you can get a bad one from either manufacturer. Some are made on Friday afternoons and Monday mornings.

Like Hawg, some are probably getting tired of my pics too; but, here goes.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old March 2, 2009, 12:00 AM   #15
CraigC
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 28, 2001
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 4,300
Piettas are good guns but from my experience, Ubertis are better guns. Better internals, fit and finish. I've never seen a Uberti with the flaws my Piettas have.
CraigC is offline  
Old March 2, 2009, 05:25 AM   #16
Raider2000
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 23, 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 717
Have you bought a new Pietta recently, say within the past 5 years?

Pietta's have improved their quality control & is now on par or exceed Uberti.

As far as the cylinder length's go, Pietta's New Model Army cylinder is .010 longer than Uberti & Euroarms.
Raider2000 is offline  
Old March 2, 2009, 09:32 AM   #17
Hawg Haggen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,639
I don't see any flaws in my Pietta's
Hawg Haggen is offline  
Old March 2, 2009, 12:46 PM   #18
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,843
I've got a 2004 Pietta 1861 Navy that's every bit as nice (actually better case colors) as my 2007 Uberti 1861 Navies. The Ubertis have lighter hammer springs; but the Pietta has a lighter trigger pull. Fit and finish on all of them is excellent.

FM
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old March 2, 2009, 11:45 PM   #19
arcticap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 2,973
It sounds like Ford vs. Chevy.
What it boils down is the percentage of defective guns and the number of defects per gun from each maker which no one could ever keep track of.
As long as no one ends up getting stuck with a defective gun, then they're both pretty good.
But since the "random" odds of getting a defective one is bound to happen to someone, then the argument shifts back again to what are the chances of getting a defective gun?
Some batches and individual guns from either company are just naturally going to be better [or worse] than others.
And if neither had any defects, then it's mostly just a matter of personal preference, cost and availability.

Last edited by arcticap; March 3, 2009 at 12:01 AM.
arcticap is offline  
Old March 3, 2009, 12:47 AM   #20
Fingers McGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,843
Quote:
It sounds like Ford vs. Chevy.
Yep. It's a Ginger or Mary Ann question. Personally I prefer Mary Ann.

I've had good and not so good Ubertis and Piettas - as well as 2nd Gen Colt BPs.

FM
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee - AKA Man of Many Colts - Alter ego of Diabolical Ken; SASS Regulator 28564-L-TG; Rangemaster and stage writer extraordinaire; Frontiersman, Pistoleer, NRA Endowment Life, NMLRA, SAF, CCRKBA, STORM 327, SV115; Charter member, Central Ozarks Western Shooters
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision see things as they are, not as they should be. Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old March 3, 2009, 07:13 AM   #21
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Yep. It's a Ginger or Mary Ann question. Personally I prefer Mary Ann.
Maybe there's hope after all...
mykeal is offline  
Old March 3, 2009, 08:14 AM   #22
DrLaw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 3, 2007
Location: Wild Western Illinois
Posts: 559
Quote:
Have you bought a new Pietta recently, say within the past 5 years?
I haven't, because of my past experience with Pietta. You saying that there are no more tool marks on the guns?

Quote:
Yep. It's a Ginger or Mary Ann question. Personally I prefer Mary Ann.
Me, too! Yummy, yum yum!

The Doc is out now.
__________________
General McAuliffe said it best "Nuts."
DrLaw is offline  
Old March 3, 2009, 08:20 AM   #23
Hawg Haggen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,639
Might be some minor tool marks inside, not outside.
Hawg Haggen is offline  
Old March 3, 2009, 08:51 AM   #24
madcratebuilder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2007
Location: Northern Orygun
Posts: 4,868
Pietta installed new cnc equipment a few years back. Quality has increased a lot. I have a newer Pietta 1858 target model and a 51 Navy .44, both have very good fit and finish. My 94 Pietta made Paterson is excellent.
I have two 1860 Army's, one Belgium made Centennial three screw, and a Uberti four screw, both are nice. The Centennial is made from some very hard steel. I would like to find another.
Pretty hard to beat Cabela's price on the 1858, it going to end soon, you may want to check it out.
madcratebuilder is offline  
Old March 4, 2009, 02:11 PM   #25
Doc Hoy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 4,562
Centaure

Madcratebuilder,

I believe it was "Smokin Gun" who also said the steel in the Centaure is harder.

I picked one up in the purchase of a pair of pistols from one of the locals. 200.00 for an ASM Remy in essentially new condition plus this Centaure which is now with one of our compadres in Ohio for rehab. The Centaure is a pretty early serial number so it is a bit loose.

I am anxious to get it back but I don't dare rush the guy.

Cheers,
__________________
Doc

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government. Thomas Jefferson
Doc Hoy is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.12568 seconds with 7 queries