The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 5, 2009, 02:25 PM   #1
rsgraebert
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 29, 2008
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 201
Legal ramifications of no-gun signs?

I have a question for those of you savvy in the area of legalese:

Are there potential legal ramifications (meaning, liabilities) to banning firearms in a public establishment?

A friend of mine suggested that a business which posts a "no guns" sign on their property could be held liable for damages if a concealed carry holder was injured by a criminal on their property as a result of not having their weapon with them. He also suggested that this liability was the impetus behind the removal of a lot of those signs. He's not a lawyer, nor am I. I'm curious if that's just hot air or if there's something to it. If so, a lot of the "here's the letter I'm writing to <insert store name> about their CPZ" folks could revise their statements to actually hold some legal water.

Thanks for any input.
__________________
Sharp as a cue ball...but moving faster.
rsgraebert is offline  
Old January 5, 2009, 07:22 PM   #2
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague County, Texas
Posts: 10,513
Can your friend prove in court that a person injured in a no-guns property was injured specifically because that person abided by the rules of the establishment...that having a gun would have conclusively precluded injury? That ain't going to happen. All that can be argued is that the person could have had a chance to preclude injury and that is far from conclusive.

To date, I don't know of any attempted or successful suits of this time and this subject has come up several times. Basically, unless otherwise stated by law, it is within the owner's right to ban guns and so long as the owner takes "reasonable" precautions for the safety of the people in the establishment, they are not liable for what happens as a result of criminal activity. "Reasonable" precautions are simple things such as proper lighting.

Maybe somebody else here can document such a suit?
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher."
-- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
Double Naught Spy is online now  
Old January 5, 2009, 09:06 PM   #3
Erik
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 1999
Location: America
Posts: 3,479
I cannot think of any, and have heard of people looking out for them for years.
__________________
Meriam Webster's: Main Entry: ci·vil·ian Pronunciation: \sə-ˈvil-yən also -ˈvi-yən\, Function: noun, Date: 14th century, 1: a specialist in Roman or modern civil law, 2 a: one not on active duty in the armed services or not on a police or firefighting force b: outsider 1, — civilian adjective
Erik is offline  
Old January 5, 2009, 09:27 PM   #4
tony pasley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: western north carolina
Posts: 1,393
North Carolina protects businesses from such lawsuits.
__________________
'It has been said that politics is the
second oldest profession. I have learned
that it bears a striking resemblance
to the first.' - Ronald Reagan
tony pasley is offline  
Old January 5, 2009, 10:27 PM   #5
JuanCarlos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 22, 2006
Posts: 2,459
Yeah, to my knowledge no such liability has ever been established. I'd not be surprised if the opposite has been (where by not banning firearms, they take on liability if an injury occurs).

Pretty sure this is why nearly every major corporation bans firearms on their property...they basically have a duty to their shareholders to reduce this financial risk, and the liability issues make it a no-brainer.
JuanCarlos is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07043 seconds with 7 queries