The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old December 16, 2008, 09:38 PM   #1
johnwilliamson062
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 6,845
M16, the ultimate infantry rifle

Who would want an M16 at Bastogne?
__________________
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. You could just donate to the Second Amendment Foundation
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 09:47 PM   #2
TheManHimself
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 25, 2008
Posts: 731
The same people who would want a Garand for clearing buildings in Iraq.
TheManHimself is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 09:49 PM   #3
Death from Afar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 7, 2004
Location: Living the dream in Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 1,610
Hmmm...a thread on the merits or otherwise of the AR family. Thats new.

To answer your question- yes, that would be me.
__________________
"Beware of the Man with one gun...he probably isnt into guns enough to be safe with it".
Death from Afar is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 10:01 PM   #4
B. Lahey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,840
A WWII M16 would have been a hell of a thing...

All steel, wood stock and pistol grip. Heavy, but so were all the other rifles and MGs. It would probably end up looking like an extra-goofy BAR type deal.

If you could teleport modern materials back to that time, I bet they would have had plenty of use for the M16. The M2 carbine was well-liked as far as I know, and that's kind of the same concept.
B. Lahey is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 10:07 PM   #5
scorpion_tyr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 10, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,304
If my only options were weapons of the era or a M16, the choice is easy. M16

If I had other options of modern military rifles I would not go with the M16. I have many hours with an M16 and I personally don't like it. I've had a few too many FTF and FTE's. My own personal opinion is that a weapon with a forward assist is a big clue not to go with that weapon. It's like paying extra for a car with two engines because they first might not start when you need it to. I've never had a use for a forward assist on any of the other military rifles I've fired.

What would I choose? TAR-21... a little payback from the future
__________________
A hit with a .45 ACP beats a hit with a .22 LR everytime. A hit with a .22 LR beats a miss with a .50 BMG everytime.
scorpion_tyr is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 10:07 PM   #6
sholling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 1999
Location: Hemet (middle of nowhere) California
Posts: 4,260
Well I don't think they were doing a lot of 1000yd shooting and from my reading many of the Germans we're carrying the Sturmgewehr. An M16 in 6.8 SPC would have been a pretty good match for that in thick woods.
__________________
Proud Life Member: National Rifle Association, California Rifle & Pistol Association, and the Second Amendment Foundation.
Annual Member: Revolutionary War Veterans Association (Project Appleseed) and the Madison Society.
sholling is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 10:16 PM   #7
SPUSCG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2008
Posts: 3,004
i'd want m240s and m21s and they can keep the colts cause berettas suck, they did have something better in the day

but yeah i think an m14 may do the trick, detachable mag, powerful, not wimpy like .223, low maintenance, walking around in the snow with no real buildings isnt good ar-15 maintenance weather.
__________________
Check us out: www.imfdb.org. Fun site for people who love gun movies.
SPUSCG is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 10:26 PM   #8
overkill556x45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 624
I'd take an M-16A2 in that situation. Mine worked fine in Afghanistan (and yes, I did use it), and it works fine here in Iowa in the winter. In fact, I haven't had a malfunction that wasn't due to bad mags in mine--and I've been using one with blanks and live ammo for seven years.

AR/M-16 threads are getting to be just troll chow. And those of us who have operational experience usually get ignored. Love it or hate it, my M-16A2/M203 worked fine when I needed it. So did those of the men in my squad.

Don't want one, don't get one. Just don't try to talk me out of mine.
overkill556x45 is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 10:54 PM   #9
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,320
I'd personally go for an RPG-7 w/plenty of rockets. There are bigger things to worry about than infantry.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 11:06 PM   #10
danweasel
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 26, 2008
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 191
Did they even have 5.56 back then? Because without it I would stick to the
M1. A 30-06 M16 might be cool though, in a ridiculous way.
__________________
When I came back to Dublin I was courtmartialed in my absence and sentenced to death in my absence, so I said they could shoot me in my absence.
- Brendan Behan
danweasel is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 11:26 PM   #11
Swampghost
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: Florida, east coast
Posts: 2,106
Me, me! Can I get the M-203 with that?

My dad and two uncles never talked much about that time. Dad was in the Navy in the Pacific. His brother (Marine) stormed Normandy. Mom's brother went in at Anzio.

This was gut and grind close warfare. IMHO the M-16 would have been an enhancement in this context for every element it was designed for.
__________________
NRA Patron Member
Swampghost is offline  
Old December 16, 2008, 11:28 PM   #12
Arabia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Massachusetts, The Bay State
Posts: 432
Not again

So what is the point of this thread again?
__________________
-Ism's in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself. Ferris Bueller, from Ferris Bueller's Day Off.
Arabia is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 12:03 AM   #13
RedneckFur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Location: Sotheastern US
Posts: 1,421
Quote:
So what is the point of this thread again?
I think its just "revenge" for the AK lover's thread a few days ago.

For as long as the AR and AK exisit, people will fight over which is better.

I think both are equal good for their designed purposes (which are different)
__________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
-George Orwell
RedneckFur is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 12:18 AM   #14
johnwilliamson062
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 6,845
I just decided if we had to have a constant ar v. Ak thread I would put a new spin on it. I meant the situation, not the technology. SO you aren't the only one with modern weapons.

S I chose an actual battle that most knew something about and wanted to see what people would throw out.

So cold you have to run the guns dry b/c the oil was solidifying
ice.snow everywhere.
a lot of long range shooting.
Terrible supply lines.
No real rear area like are found in most situations today,
__________________
$0 of an NRA membership goes to legislative action or court battles. Not a dime. Only money contributed to the NRA-ILA or NRA-PVF. You could just donate to the Second Amendment Foundation
First Shotgun Thread First Rifle Thread First Pistol Thread
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 12:39 AM   #15
Arabia
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Massachusetts, The Bay State
Posts: 432
We will see how long this one lasts before in degenerates into the standard AR vs Ak/whatever flame war. Just the way you started the thread makes it clear you want to start another BS AK vs AR thread. As with all the other threads on this subject, I very much doubt anything new will be brought to light in this thread.
__________________
-Ism's in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself. Ferris Bueller, from Ferris Bueller's Day Off.
Arabia is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 12:40 AM   #16
Ignition Override
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 18, 2008
Posts: 1,804
How about the need for flames?
Some winter clothing would have been much better.
It was one of the coldest winters on record in Belgium etc. And German 88mm shells hitting trees near foxholes sometimes made the point moot.

In 1940, being adapted to very bitter conditions helped the far outnumbered Finns beat the much larger Soviet forces.
When you are from the much warmer Ukraine, shivering with your platoon next to a very bright fire, the stealthy Finns in the woods could have used other rifles.
A .223 might have worked. Many Marines west of Danang, Vietnam called them "mouseguns".
Citing (Lt.) Philip Caputo, "A Rumour Of War".

The lack of winter uniforms also helped doom many German troops on the Eastern Front.

Last edited by Ignition Override; December 17, 2008 at 12:50 AM.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 01:44 AM   #17
MaxHeadSpace
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 8, 2008
Posts: 129
AK -- for all the political, economic reasons there's 100 million of them out there.
MaxHeadSpace is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 03:34 AM   #18
Al Thompson
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: May 2, 1999
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,605
His brother (Marine) stormed Normandy.

No Marines in the European Theater. Check your facts.
__________________
http://www.scfirearms.org/
Al Thompson is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 07:42 AM   #19
Viking Josh
Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2008
Posts: 29
RedneckFur, I agree with you, both have thier strengths and weaknesses, so the best thing is to have both in your group, the AK's for the short-mid range, and the M16s for mid-long range.
Viking Josh is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 10:14 AM   #20
Bartholomew Roberts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 5,719
The American Rifleman just had a bio on a famous Finnish sniper. Apparently he killed most of his targets with a 9mm Suomi. I would have no trouble with an M16 in Bastogne like conditions - they are already used in colder environments on a regular basis. Alaska, for example.

However, if you don't want to use one that doesn't bother me in the slightest. I actually shoot my ARs instead of just reading about them on the Internet so I have confidence mine will work fine for me. If you don't have that confidence then use something else, the arrow is less important than the Indian.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 10:28 AM   #21
GeorgeF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 23, 2004
Posts: 572
Yes, the Finns had excellent success with the Suomi SMG. Most of their fighting was relatively close (< 100 yards) so a Finn in an excellent position with 70 round drums would reap a hell of a toll. Swedish Suomi has nice long barrel (over 12") and has very good accuracy out to 100 yards at least.

Oooooohhh, M16 chambered in 8mm Kurz (German MP44 round). Now THAT would be some fun.

Last edited by GeorgeF; December 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM.
GeorgeF is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 10:59 AM   #22
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,878
Quote:
M16, the ultimate infantry rifle
No, not really.
__________________
facebook.com/M14EBR.US
SR420 is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 11:49 AM   #23
Limeyfellow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2005
Posts: 1,380
Quote:
His brother (Marine) stormed Normandy.

No Marines in the European Theater. Check your facts.
He could have been one of the Marines assigned to the capital ships to give protection. There were quite a few of them.
Limeyfellow is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 12:58 PM   #24
trekkie951
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2008
Location: BERNE NY
Posts: 47
yea supplies were low at Bastogne, as was ammo. the soldiers were in the foxholes almost costantley. I don't own either rifle so I cant say thing about their reliability. but from what ive read with the ar its 'if you take care of it it will take care of you'. well at Bastogne they might not have had the time or tools needed to maintain the ar. When the garand froze up the GI's urinated on it and it was good to go.
trekkie951 is offline  
Old December 17, 2008, 01:04 PM   #25
SPUSCG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2008
Posts: 3,004
i think the m14 would be good, very little retraining since its basically an upgraded garand, and bring back extra colts for everyone without sidearms
mp5s and benelli m4s for trench clearing haha and barett 82s for vehicles and id love to see a stuka hit w/ a stinger
__________________
Check us out: www.imfdb.org. Fun site for people who love gun movies.
SPUSCG is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13587 seconds with 10 queries