The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 10, 2008, 01:25 AM   #1
L'derry
Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2008
Location: NH
Posts: 63
Difference in Scopes

I've had a couple of nice shooting rifles with low cost scopes on them for several years. I've dropped deer with them and never had a problem related to the scopes, but I'm getting scope guilt. Every season my buddies bug me about having "cheap" scopes, and that I need to buy something from at least the 20th century (if not the 21st!). I have one 4x32 Universal that I bought used back in 1980. It's been on the same Rem 760 ever since. And a Bushnell dawn/dusk 3-9x40 about 5 years old (~$79) on a single shot .270.

So my question is.....since scopes will range from $30 (usually shotgun or muzzleloader models) to upwards of $2000, where the heck is the practical range...The optics look good to me on all these. They all claim to be waterproof, shockproof, and fogproof. What's important to me once I have a clear crisp picture is, how shock proof is the scope really? Will it really move the reticle 1/4" at 100 yards accurately and repeat that accurately?

It seems I can get that for less than $2000, but how about $150? Any recommendations? Not sure I'm going to spring for new scopes, since I seem to see and kill deer in front of me anyway.
L'derry is offline  
Old December 10, 2008, 01:36 AM   #2
kametc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2007
Location: S W , Montana
Posts: 206
I would change scopes the minute you start missing what your shooting at because of the scope. That may never happen. That aside I prefer the $200 to $300 Leupolds. (VX-II) but I also have a Burris Fullfield 3X9 I like and they are about $199 and come with a silly spotting scope or binoc for free. My buddy just bought a Nikon Monarch 3X9 on sale for $135 that seems to be a pretty good deal.

Ken
__________________
"Allons" Blackhorse Troopers !
kametc is offline  
Old December 12, 2008, 01:13 AM   #3
Big Caliber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 10, 2006
Location: S. CA
Posts: 396
If your current scopes are doing the job, why waste $$$ on something you already have? After all the deer doesn't know or care what you paid for a scope.
Big Caliber is offline  
Old December 12, 2008, 06:48 PM   #4
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS (new to MS)
Posts: 4,702
The "price" of a scope does not define its useful range. It helps to determine how it will hold up in actual use. If you are talking about a very light recoiling .223 then you can get buy with much less internal quality than if you are putting the scope on a hard recoiling caliber.
Doyle is offline  
Old December 12, 2008, 07:25 PM   #5
mes228
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 19, 2005
Posts: 608
scopes

Some older scopes are outstanding. I have read that you would have to spend over $1,000 to equal the optics of the old (ie 1970's era) Bushnell Banner Japanese scopes. I know I've always been impressed with the several I've owned. I do like Leupold for the eye relief, they also hold their value much better than others.
mes228 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06768 seconds with 7 queries