The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 9, 2008, 02:13 PM   #1
twocan
Member
 
Join Date: December 6, 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 24
12 ga. Low recoil shells

I am looking for some low recoil 12 ga self defense shotgun shells for a Mossberg 500. Since it will be defending in close quarters (< 40 feet) I am looking for accuracy and quick followup rather than maximum stopping power.

Probably want #4 Buckshot, but open to all suggestions.
twocan is offline  
Old December 9, 2008, 02:21 PM   #2
LucifersPants
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2008
Posts: 125
There's lots of opinions on this...and many will disagree with me, but depending on your living arrangements, over-penetration is something you may need to consider. Friendly fire is not good. At your average HD confrontation distance, even a #4 or #6 game load will knock any man down, and you'll run much less risk of hitting a family member/neighbor on the other side of a wall. Buckshot is nice, but you only need to kill the guy once.
LucifersPants is offline  
Old December 9, 2008, 03:47 PM   #3
Cerick
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 13, 2008
Location: 973, NJ
Posts: 331
Federal tactical 2 3/4" 00 buck with flite control wad. I believe they make it in a low recoil round. I have the normal ones and they are comfortable to shoot, and pattern very well out of my 870 even with a cylinder bore choke.. about 12"-15" pattern at 25 yards.
Cerick is offline  
Old December 13, 2008, 01:40 PM   #4
badge851
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2005
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 243
You have a couple of options with Federal® Ammunition. First, and this is what my Dept uses, is their Power Shok™ Low Recoil load; #H132. This is a 00 Buck 9 pellet load @ 1140fps. Their other load is the Premium™ Vital Shok™ w/the Flite Control™ wad, Copper plated pellets (#PFC154). This is also a 00 Buck 9 pellet load @ 1145fps. Remington® offers a Low Recoil load of 8 pellets of 00 Buck @ 1200fps #RL12BK00. Lastly Winchester® has a Low Recoil load called Win Lite™, 9 pellets of 00 Buck @ 1125fps. Any one of these loads will do the job you need for personal & home defense.
__________________
Only two defining forces have ever died for you:
1. Jesus Christ.
2. The American Soldier, Sailor, Airman, & Marine.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Last edited by badge851; December 13, 2008 at 01:53 PM.
badge851 is offline  
Old December 13, 2008, 01:57 PM   #5
nemoaz
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2007
Location: Meechigan
Posts: 492
Forget the #4 and #6 dove loads, unless you have a problem with dove burglars in your next of the woods.

My agency uses reduced recoil OO buck, of varying flavors. I'm not aware of any #4 buck reduced recoil. That would be nice.
nemoaz is offline  
Old December 14, 2008, 07:53 AM   #6
wnycollector
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Posts: 1,834
Quote:
I'm not aware of any #4 buck reduced recoil.
This might be as close as one can get to a "lower" recoil #4 buck loading. Nobel sport has a 27 pellet 1290fps loading. Granted its only ~50fps slower than regular #4 but...
http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=368798

I just bought 2 boxes of their #4 and 00 buck (12 pellet/1290fps) to pattern in my maverick 88. I am currently using (and very happy with) fiocchi's low recoil 00 (9 pellets/1150fps) buck. I get a nice consistent 6" pattern at 12 yards with it.
wnycollector is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07489 seconds with 7 queries