The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 4, 2010, 09:05 AM   #1
fastr nu
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2009
Posts: 10
daughter's 1st time deer hunting--what caliber?

I have 13 yr. old daughter (avg. size). first time deer hunting this year, would like some advice on caliber/action choice. thinking, of course .243 but maybe something like 6mm or a 25-06. the area we will hunt will offer opportunity for
clear follow-up shots if needed. thanks for the help!
fastr nu is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 09:10 AM   #2
jmortimer
Junior member
 
Join Date: January 24, 2010
Location: South West Riverside County California
Posts: 2,763
I like the .243 - very efficient killer with little recoil. With a Nosler Partition there is not much it can't do.
jmortimer is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 09:13 AM   #3
mikejonestkd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Brockport, NY
Posts: 2,769
A .243 in a rem model 7 - light, easy to carry all day, accurate, mild recoil....more than enough power for deer at normal hunting ranges.

Get good glass and have her practice alot with a .22 rimfire before she moves up to the centerfire.

Have a great experience with your daughter!
__________________
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
mikejonestkd is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 09:47 AM   #4
RWBlue01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 16, 2008
Posts: 176
If you already had one, I would say it would be fine, but......not having one with your options open.....? I never really like the 243. I considered it too much for some things and not enough for others. Other people I hunt with love the 243, 25-06 and ....

At her age, I think I had my grandfathers 270 or 30-06 blasting away with rapid fire and it didn't bother me.

You could do anything from a 44mag lever action if the ranges are short.
You could do something like a 30-06/308 if you want her to have one gun for North America (reloading required).

What is she shooting now that she likes?
What is the maximum range you expect her to shoot? (Can she do it now with your current rifle?)

Lots and lots of options.
RWBlue01 is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 01:38 PM   #5
HiBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 3,815
I think your .243 idea is on the right track,
The fine line is,shooting well is a high priority.Ear protection,of course,and modest loads to condition her,along with the fundamental of calling the shot/follow through.Then,adequate to be reliable
Going along with this,the rifle has to fit.
How big are the deer,how long are the shots?

There aren't many .250 -3000 Savages,but it comes to mind.So does a .257 Roberts.There are some CZ 7.62x39 bolt rifles.That same rifle would make a 6.5 Grendel.
HiBC is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 01:46 PM   #6
thesheepdog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2010
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 1,996
.243 should be alright if she can shoot it accurately.

I would say a .223 if your state allows and kills are no more than 100 yards away.
__________________
Krav Maga/Judo
Qualified Rifleman/Marksmanship Instructor/Lic. Medic
"There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit" Romans 8:1
thesheepdog is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 02:06 PM   #7
Kreyzhorse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 11,514
I'd say you are right on with the .243. Good luck this year.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson
Kreyzhorse is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 02:45 PM   #8
billnourse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 16, 2010
Location: Bloomfield, NM
Posts: 366
I would consider the 7mm08. It comes from Remington in a youth size, and there are reduced loads for it that would have no more of an intimidation factor than the .243. This would leave open the option of hunting heavier game at a future time. The .243 is a varmint or light (White Tail/ Antelope) game rifle, and shouldn't be pressed into heavier service.

I would also choose a 25/06 over the .243. Don't get me wrong, I really like the .243, and it will be my next centerfire purchase, I just feel it is pretty limited.

Bill
__________________
Cooper 52 25/06, Cooper 52 30/06, Cooper 52 338/06Cooper 57 .17HMR, Remington VS .22/250 all left handed. Rock River Predator Persuit AR-15, 1952 Marlin 336 in 30/30. 2 Kimber 1911, Colt 1911, S&W .357 Mag, Kahr .40 and .380
billnourse is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 02:49 PM   #9
kd7sgm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 21, 2010
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 223
This is my daughter's first deer hunting trip as well and she is also 13. She will be using the same 243 I used to take my first deer when I was her age.
__________________
I would like either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it.
kd7sgm is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 02:52 PM   #10
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 5,646
.243 up to 7mm-08 or 7x57 depending on the load.

Getting a rifle that fits is the big thing.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 03:02 PM   #11
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,585
I'll throw in a few more to choose from 6.5X55, .260 Rem, .250 Savage, .257 Roberts, .25-06 Rem, and 6.8 Rem Spcl. Everything else previously mentioned will work fine as well. I've got a 7 year old girl and she wants to hunt with me, I'll start her off with a .250 Savage. Just because I think it is a cool little cartridge and since it is for her I can justify the build.
taylorce1 is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 03:07 PM   #12
jimbob86
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 7,109
Quote:
A .243 in a rem model 7
Keep in mind that a light gun negates some of the low recoil benefits of the light caliber.

All other variable being equal, a heavy gun kicks less than a light one, and semi-auto uses up some of the recoil energy to operate the action.

You can also download ...... if you can handload. I'm starting my 12 y.o. daughter off with an 8x57 ...... but I've downloaded it to 2300 f/sec, using a 170 gr RN soft point bullet. With a Limbsaver recoil pad, it's pretty mild.
__________________
TheGolden Rule of Tool Use: "If you don't know what you are doing, DON'T."

http://nefirearm.com/
jimbob86 is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 03:19 PM   #13
JerryM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 1999
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,884
I have taken deer with .270, 7MM Mag, 300 Wby, and .243 Win.

I handload all my ammunition. I loaded the .243 with 100 gr Horn and Sierra, plus 105 gr Speer. Fortunately my gun is a fast one, and is a Pre 64 M 70 Fwt. My handloads with 100 gr bullets clock at 3150 fps. That is considerably faster than factory loads, but are not excessive for this gun.

I have had a higher percentage of one shot in the tracks kills with the .243 than any of the others. I have probably taken a dozen deer and two antelope plus one barbary sheep with the .243. It has performed well. The longest range for antelope was 525 yards, and deer about 250.
The bullet construction and velocity seem ideal for deer at reasonable ranges. If I were to shoot over 400 yds at deer I would choose the .270.

The light recoil and good performance make the .243 my choice for a youngster, and make hitting the game easier.

Regards,
Jerry
__________________
Ecclesiastes 12:13 *┬ÂLet us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
14 *For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.
JerryM is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 03:29 PM   #14
imacanuk
Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 98
.257 Roberts, or 250 Savage. .260 Rem or 6.5x55.
Or .243
Or something bigger with a reduced load.
7-08 might be a good choice too.
imacanuk is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 03:35 PM   #15
mdd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Posts: 626
The 25-06 is my "go-to" cartridge for everything I do. With that said, my handloads in a lighter gun do have more recoil than I would recommend for a youngster. When my son is old enough to deer hunt, he will start with a 243 (smallest legal in ks) and some lighter loads. Don't want him to miss a great deer because he's scared of the recoil.
Lots of rounds through a 22 is a great place to start for them too.
This forum isn't very friendly to ruger but ruger makes a very nice compact or youth model rifle. There is one sitting on the shelf at the local sporting goods store that I've been considering for my son. I'll probably wait though since he's only 16 months old!
__________________
So many coyotes....so little time....
mdd is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 03:47 PM   #16
imacanuk
Member
 
Join Date: September 2, 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 98
I was 12 when I took my first deer. I used a Ruger Ultralight in .250 Savage. I was small for my age, and I don't remember being adversely affected by recoil. 1 shot... dead doe.
imacanuk is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 04:49 PM   #17
UniversalFrost
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,298
.243 is what I started with (well for center fire rifles that is)

the compact rugers are good, but a bit pricey.

remington and weatherby came out with rifles that have a youth stock and an adult stock, so when the kid gets big enough they just swap out the short LOP stock with the normal LOP stock. They can still be found online and in some stores.

for my daughter (turns 13 soon) she didn't like my old rifle in .243, but took to the 6.8 REM SPC and has been deadly accurate with it. Now this is in an AR platform, but with a 6.8 bullet (.270) at 110 grains (nosler accubonds) that is some serious pig and deer medicine. (remington makes a bolt action rifle in 6.8, but is based on the outdated and old SAMMI spec chambers, but they will be soon releasing updated guns with the SPC II chambers and proper 1:10 and 1:11 twist barrels)
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA

"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green

UniversalFrost is offline  
Old October 4, 2010, 05:05 PM   #18
woodguru
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 14, 2010
Location: Placerville, Ca
Posts: 589
.243

Since 1973 and my first Sako .243 Forrester I have shot at least 20 deer, and yes there were large Mule deer. That cartridge seems to have an inherent accuracy edge. Even one a friend had with iron sights was so accurate he never felt the need to scope the thing, it was a Remington 700. In fact that guy was a 30-06 die hard until he shot my Sako and he had a .243 within a year. The .243 seems notable for drop where they are hit performance, and I'm not the only one that says that. It seems to have superb terminal performance even at 400+ yards which is about as far out as I tend to go, I have taken a couple beyond though out to about 475.

I'd be making the same recommendation for a man as well as your daughter, it just happens that it had a very mild recoil that's perfectly suited for women and new shooters.

Back about 20 years ago one of the guys my brother worked with needed to be outfitted with a rifle for a big Colorado deer hunt he was going on. He had never hunted or done much shooting but he had decided he needed a .270 even though I told him he could try my Sako .243. He bought a Sako .270 Hunter and a Leupold 4-12x scope and Sako rings that are pricey but excellent. I mounted the scope for him.

We went to the range and he wanted to sight it in, I told him to leave me three or four bullets to check it out after he was done. I was shooting the .243 and a .22-250 next to him so I was also trying to see what he was doing. His shots were so all over the target as in 14 inches all over with nothing even close to another shot that it was impossible for him to make any adjustments. He was doing a lot of lip service about how lousy the rifle was shooting and kept asking if I was sure the scope was mounted right.

He ran through a box and I told him to let me see what was up with my four I had set aside. The first shot was an inch right and low so I dialed in the changes and shot three that could be covered with a dime. I assured him there was nothing wrong with the rifle and that there were an awful lot of guys that would be downright tickled pink with a rifle that shot like his did. I told him to get another box of shells so we could go back out to the range the next day but he said he wouldn't have another chance before he was to go to Colorado.

Next best thing was to tell him to try 10 or 20 shots through the .243. The first shot he remarked how light the kick was, his words were, "wow, this thing doesn't even kick". He was shooting groups like a pro with it, and I asked him if he was sure he didn't want to take the .243.

Well he missed a big buck that was only 75 yards away standing there looking at him, he shot under it the first shot, saw it go low so he compensated and shot over it's back the second time. He was dead sure something was wrong with the scope so he took it to a gunstore and had it remounted. He did a followup Colorado hunt and pulled the rookie move of all time. He had a deer 20 yards away from him, and had the scope on 14x even though I had told him several times to keep it at 4x, he said all he could see was detailed hair, he didn't have a clue what part of the body he was looking at. My comment was "tell me you didn't shoot, please". He said, "I did but I don't know if I hit it or not". At that point I washed my hands of him, I couldn't hang with the total ineptitude.

My point here is that a low recoil is way easier for a new hunter to shoot well, and a .243 will do the job sometimes too well as it will punch a bullet through the shoulders and out the back side.

Stick to your original thoughts here, it's perfect.
__________________
Fiction is harder to write than the truth, fiction has to make sense, the truth can be unbelievable.

Last edited by woodguru; October 4, 2010 at 05:18 PM.
woodguru is offline  
Old October 5, 2010, 12:28 PM   #19
sc928porsche
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
Use the 260 remington. Recoil is close to the same as the 243, but with a bit more knockdown. It would provide her with a rifle that she could use for a lifetime of hunting including elk up to 200yds.
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question. What is stupid is not asking it.
sc928porsche is offline  
Old October 5, 2010, 01:17 PM   #20
greatbasin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 5, 2010
Posts: 1
I went with a 7mm-08 for my girls rifle...and she loves it.
greatbasin is offline  
Old October 5, 2010, 05:43 PM   #21
k in AR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 12, 1999
Location: Arkansas USA
Posts: 434
While I agree with the cal suggestions, each young shooter is different as to how they react to recoil. It would be a great help if you are a member of a good gun club where she could try different weight rifles and test "light" recoil calibers. It needs to be a legal cal, but it dosen't take much to bring down a deer with an excellent shot.
k in AR is offline  
Old October 5, 2010, 06:45 PM   #22
jammin1237
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 16, 2008
Location: Wisonsin
Posts: 269
13 year old shooting for the first time? 7.62x39mm ... cheap, does the job, get a rossi single shot and see if the young shooter likes it, then go from there....
jammin1237 is offline  
Old October 5, 2010, 07:37 PM   #23
sserdlihc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 10, 2008
Location: S.C.
Posts: 1,434
I have a friend in Florida that has a daughter that killed her first deer with a 7mm-08. I believe she is 15 yo.

I personally have had my daughter squeeze off a few rounds of my .308 Bar with the BOSS. She is 10 yo and doesn't hunt. Still can't get her to be quiet enough and not so figety.
__________________
Familiarity breeds contempt, while rarity wins admiration. Aupleius
If someone doesn't like you, that's their problem! Milton Childress
sserdlihc is offline  
Old October 5, 2010, 08:33 PM   #24
doceaux
Member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 95
Another vote for the .260

Lifetime rifle for her and great round for anyone who puts a premium on performance over advertising.
doceaux is offline  
Old October 5, 2010, 08:40 PM   #25
Yellowfin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2007
Location: West Upstate NY
Posts: 2,303
Another excellent choice might be the .30-30. Rifles for that are light and slim and can fit a smaller statured person quite well as short length of pull can be a necessity. As previously suggested, a 6.8 SPC in an AR15 also can fit well as the telescoping stock can easily adjust to her length of pull.

I seem to have missed in previous posts asking: what do you currently have with you already?
__________________
Students for Concealed Carry on Campus http://www.concealedcampus.org
New York gun owners unite! Join now! http://www.nyshooters.net
May Issue is the new Separate but Equal.
Yellowfin is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.14476 seconds with 9 queries