The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 23, 2008, 01:10 PM   #1
9mm1033
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2005
Location: A big city with far too many cars and people.
Posts: 932
44 magnum, 357 magnum and an arrow on deer.

As a shotgun hunter of whitetails, I'm considering using my 357 magnum revolver. I know a 44 would be better, but I got to thinking. If an arrow can drop a deer, (good shot placement of course) why not a 357 hunting round. In other words, do I really have to buy a 44 revolver?
__________________
No one reads or cares what is written in ones signature box. So I'm not writing anything worth reading or remembering.
9mm1033 is offline  
Old March 23, 2008, 04:04 PM   #2
Loaded4yote
Member
 
Join Date: March 15, 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 70
.357 will do the job as long as the shooter is up to the task. 22lr is enough if you're a good aim.

If it's legal where you hunt and you're comfortable hunting with a round then use it. Just be sure you realize the limitations of that particular cartridge.
Loaded4yote is offline  
Old March 23, 2008, 04:27 PM   #3
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 18,428
A friend of mine used to hunt with a .357Mag levergun. He was impressed with its performance but he didn't try to stretch his shots either.

And, of course it's not quite kosher to compare .357Mag out of a rifle length barrel to the same load out of a revolver...
__________________
Did you know that there is a TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Old March 23, 2008, 06:03 PM   #4
john1911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2006
Location: The relatively sane part of IL
Posts: 383
Keep your shots at archery distance and the .357 will take deer. IMO, the .44 will do a better job, but with enough practice the .357 will suffice.
__________________
Almost any problem can be solved by a liberal dose of .45 230 gr JHPs.
john1911 is offline  
Old March 23, 2008, 06:53 PM   #5
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Starkville, MS (new to MS)
Posts: 4,873
Also consider Hornady's new LeverEvolution style pointed tip bullet.
Doyle is offline  
Old March 23, 2008, 08:33 PM   #6
castnblast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2006
Location: Corpus Christi TX
Posts: 1,148
I've had great luck w/ .357 at archery distances...50yds & under-I think it would do great beyond, but that is the limitation of my ability to hit a 6" plate w/ all 6 rounds. That's where I'd draw the line. don't shoot farther than where you can consistantly hit a 6" plate and you'll do fine. I suppose If I were to practice more, I could do better. I have too many other "toys" to take deer with.
BTW, I really like the 125 HP. Works great...wouldn't want to get hit with one of those rounds.
__________________
VEGETARIAN...old indian word for bad hunter

Last edited by castnblast; March 23, 2008 at 08:34 PM. Reason: because I 4got
castnblast is offline  
Old March 24, 2008, 07:57 AM   #7
Jack O'Conner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,495


This cow elk was taken with 357 MAG revolver. Two shots. Distance was about 50 feet. The animal weighed approx. 450 - 500 lbs (guessing).

357 MAG does not have the power of 44 MAG but is quite lethal at archery distances. But it takes patience and self discipline to pass up less-than-ideal shot angles or longer distances.

I advise against scoping a hunting revolver. Avoid long shots!

Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release.

Last edited by Jack O'Conner; March 24, 2008 at 10:31 AM. Reason: added text
Jack O'Conner is offline  
Old March 24, 2008, 09:55 AM   #8
Boris Bush
Junior member
 
Join Date: September 7, 2007
Posts: 921
A 44 Mag will not make a less than ideal shot or distance magicaly ideal either. Shot for shot on deer (light skin light boned) 44 mag and 357 mag will perform equaly well granted proper shot placement.
Boris Bush is offline  
Old March 24, 2008, 12:15 PM   #9
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,484
I agree that a 357 Mag will take deer at reasonable distances. But before comparing apples and oranges and basing your decision on a fallacious argument, you should know that arrows and bullets create wounds in totally different ways.

Arrows use the momentum of the arrow to drive a cutting blade into the animal's flesh, causing shear of the tissues, forming a wound channel. In this manner, it takes very little kinetic energy to cause penetration of skin, muscle and organs, because the weight of the arrow times the velocity of the arrow are focused on the very thin cutting edge of the arrowhead.

Bullets cause wounds by high velocity and the mass of the bullet surpassing the tensile strength of flesh and bone, thereby penetrating and damaging tissue and organs.

Totally different mechanisms, totally different wounds.

School's out. Thank you for your attention. Leave donations in the cup by the door.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old March 24, 2008, 01:40 PM   #10
9mm1033
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2005
Location: A big city with far too many cars and people.
Posts: 932
I can't find the cup by the door for my donation. Thanks...
__________________
No one reads or cares what is written in ones signature box. So I'm not writing anything worth reading or remembering.
9mm1033 is offline  
Old March 24, 2008, 01:52 PM   #11
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: Rhome, TX
Posts: 4,641
Quote:
I advise against scoping a hunting revolver.
Jack, would you expound upon this idea. I fully understand your advisement to avoid long shots, but scopes and long distance don't always go hand in hand. I appreciate having my eye focused on both the target and my sighting system simultaneously. A 1x or red dot seem ideal for what we are talking about.
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!
fisherman66 is offline  
Old March 25, 2008, 06:36 AM   #12
Jack O'Conner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,495
Fisherman:

You can scope your handgun if you want to. I won't do it because it adds to bulk and weight plus might tempt me to shoot farther than I should. Even the mighty 44MAG is no long distance hunting arm.

Good hunting to you.

Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release.
Jack O'Conner is offline  
Old March 25, 2008, 02:01 PM   #13
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: Rhome, TX
Posts: 4,641
Thanks for the response Jack. I appreciate your comments and disagree with only a smidgeon of what you suggest. Irons are less precise than crosshairs. It's important to be able to use both, but a scope make for a more humane shot when I'm behind the trigger. Again that's just me. I admire those who tilt the odds away from success. If using open sights does that, I'm all for it.
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!
fisherman66 is offline  
Old March 27, 2008, 06:31 PM   #14
tube_ee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2004
Posts: 492
Yes, the .44 is more powerful, but

especially with a handgun, most shooters should not attempt a shot on game at any range beyond 50-60 yards, regardless of caliber. That, I think, is also an argument against scoping handguns. That scope might encourage you to take shots that you shouldn't be taking.

First shot in the vitals. Form field positions. Every time. Nothing else will do.

At the ranges that 90% of us have any business taking a shot at a deer, I don't consider a properly-loaded .357 "marginal."

Is the .44 "better?" Yes.

Is the .357 enough? Yes.

If you're a shooter who can go beyond 60 yards with a handgun, then by all means go for the .44. Also, you have my admiration, because I can't do it. Past 100 yards? Very, very few can go there, no matter what they're got in their hands.

--Shannon



--Shannon
tube_ee is offline  
Old March 29, 2008, 12:28 AM   #15
rhgunguy
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2006
Posts: 1,057
As long as you stay within the ranges that you would take deer with a bow, the .357 will be just as good and possibly better.
rhgunguy is offline  
Old March 29, 2008, 07:37 AM   #16
Glen P
Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2007
Posts: 17
Does anyone use a 10mm? S&W model 610?
Glen P is offline  
Old March 29, 2008, 08:06 AM   #17
HankB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2000
Location: Central Texas, outside of Austin
Posts: 1,694
As "Scorch" pointed out, the arrow kill mechanism is a bit different than that of a bullet.

But arrows are still basically pointy sticks, and have been used to kill deer for many thousands of years . . . and for most of that time, compound bows and modern broadheads were not being used.

If you use relatively heavy bullets in your .357 and place the shots properly, it will do a fine job.
__________________
To be kind to your enemy is to be cruel to yourself - Sun Tzu
HankB is offline  
Old March 29, 2008, 08:35 AM   #18
ro2
Member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2008
Location: S.E. Mi.
Posts: 29
I have shot 2 deer with my 10mm both recoved in less than 50 yds I shot 1 at 15 yds the other at 45yds with handloads
ro2 is offline  
Old March 29, 2008, 08:39 AM   #19
Glen P
Member
 
Join Date: December 24, 2007
Posts: 17
ro2,

What kind of gun were you using?
Glen P is offline  
Old March 29, 2008, 09:35 AM   #20
lon371
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 1, 2007
Location: S.Indiana
Posts: 252
Do you have to buy a .44? yes, if you have the extra funds. Not because your .357 is to small. But solely on the fact you need another gun. I know of a few people who use .357 mags, quite succefully. Check your local laws, this may require a T/C contender with a large caliber barrel. Not because your .357 wont do the job, More like you realllyy need to buy one more gun.
Like most everyone here says"shot placement" and practice. Once your comfort level is there, I say go for it
This year I will hunt with a T/C Contender .357 Mag on my side, and a H&R .44 mag. rifle."thank you Indiana"
lon371 is offline  
Old March 29, 2008, 11:29 AM   #21
Yellowfin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2007
Location: West Upstate NY
Posts: 2,303
I know that a .357 isn't legal in Alabama, may not be there. If it is available to you, see if you can buy or borrow a .41 or .44. Both can be light loaded for when you're not hunting, and the .41 is particularly enjoyable.
Yellowfin is offline  
Old April 3, 2008, 07:47 PM   #22
tatso7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 22, 2006
Location: southwest
Posts: 107
I killed a 200 pounder hog with two pumps of 45 LC from a single action wheel gun not that I'm hunting with one but that d--g thing chase us after my buddy poke him with an arrow near the butt. I dont hunt with guns anymore, so far , I killed 6 hogs, 2 deer, coyotes and jackrabbits with a arrows. 44 and 357 mag will do the job with good shot placement. Handguns and arrows are close quarter weapons and should be use as one. If you're planning to use this weapon for long distance shots, might as well get a rifle.
tatso7 is offline  
Old January 3, 2009, 11:24 AM   #23
Ach Buck
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Posts: 1
.357 worked well for me on deer

I have taken deer in Wisconsin in the past with a .357 mag, Ruger GP100, 6 inch barrel, 4 power scope. The range was between 30 – 70 yards, using a 158 gain bullet (hand load) and lots of practice. When I shot my deer it was legal as long as the muzzle velocity was 1100 fps or higher. Not sure what the current regulations are. I’m more in to bow hunting now. Most bow shot only 300 fps (even if they are advertised at higher speeds, measure in liberators and under perfect conditions). What I liked on my .357 set up was that I could hold the gun straight using one hand to support the wrist of my shutting hand. The recoil was very manageable for me. Again, my set up worked great for me and the scope is a definitely most if you shot past 30 yards (my opinion).
Ach Buck is offline  
Old January 3, 2009, 11:58 AM   #24
Daryl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
There's nothing wrong with using a .357 on deer, but comparing it to a razor tipped arrow is a really bad comparison.

Bowhunters regularly take large elk and buffalo sized game, as well as grizzly bears, and the .357 would be considered a little light for those.

Remember, an arrow doesn't kill by driving a blunt object through a critter. It slices it's way through with razor sharp blades.

For a little fun, take a 5 gallon plastic paint bucket and fill it full of sand. Then shoot the bucket full of sand with a heavy, razor tipped arrow and a 30-06, and see which penetrates the bucket full of sand.

Arrows can and do kill far better than many think they do.

Daryl
Daryl is offline  
Old January 3, 2009, 12:05 PM   #25
BradF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 7, 2008
Location: NE AL
Posts: 172
Quote:
I know that a .357 isn't legal in Alabama, may not be there
That's not so. According to the 08-09 Alabama Hunting regulations, there are no restrictions regarding Handgun caliber other than using centerfire mushrooming ammunition. Using a blackpowder handgun then they must be 40 cal or larger.
BradF is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13795 seconds with 7 queries