The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 28, 2008, 01:00 PM   #1
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
100 yard handgun question

I am starting to get interested in going to a handgun for hunting mule deer. All of the mulies I have taken with my 30-06 have been within 100 yds. Is 100 yds realistic with a handgun? I am talking about "traditional" handguns, not something chambered in a rifle cartridge.

Scope/no scope? Caliber? anything else you want to share?

Thanks,

Dave
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 01:48 PM   #2
beardenbc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 21, 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 189
I'd keep it with a scope. 100yds is a LONG shot for a handgun regardless of manufacturer.

If you really want to reach out that far with a pistol round, consider a Thompson Center Encore with one of the 15" barrels. They have a barrel for .500S&W, or you can get them straight from the factory with .44 mag. You may be able to get it straight from the factory with the .500, but I think you may have to make some calls.

If that's not what you'd consider traditional enough of a pistol... here's a monster of a wheelgun made for hunting.
http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...14&isFirearm=Y
beardenbc is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 03:02 PM   #3
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
Man! That is a beast!!
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 03:26 PM   #4
LionHunter
Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 94
For Mule Deer you don't need the S&W 500 - I used mine for Cape Buffalo. The S&W 460 is outstanding for your game at 100 yards. Scope it, using a Warne mount and a Bushnell scope with rainguard. The mount and scope will hold up to the recoil of the heavy loadings, should you need them for bigger game. Hornady makes an excellent round for deer at 200 gr with their SST bullet. You can also use the lighter .454 and .45LC in this revolver. I suggest the 8 3/4" bbl for hunting at 100 yards. These S&W X Frame revolvers are truely an incredible design and are a pleasure to shoot.

Uncle Mike's or Bianchi both make a soft shoulder holster to fit the gun with scope which will provide protection.
LionHunter is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 04:19 PM   #5
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
LionHunter, Thanks for the info. That gets me started in the right direction.

If you shoot the lighter loads for practice - say the 45 LC, how far off will you be when you move up to the .454 or the .460? I would assume a lot, with the step up, but that is just my assumption.

Thanks again!
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 04:31 PM   #6
TexasSeaRay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 810
I've taken whitetail here in Texas with my Model 29 8 3/8" barrel, no scopes at fifty to sixty yards. Have taken smaller whitetail (does) with my 686 8 3/8" barrel at around forty yards with a 180 bullet.

I carry one or the other in a shoulder rig when hunting in case a deer "pops up" at a range that I think would just flat be unsporting to shoot with a long gun.

Jeff
__________________
If every single gun owner belonged to the NRA as well as their respective state rifle/gun association, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in today.

So to those of you who are members of neither, thanks for nothing.
TexasSeaRay is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 04:41 PM   #7
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
LionHunter (or anyone with personal knowledge) -

Do you have the integral base (compensated hunter) or the standard? On the website, I can't tell if the standard is tapped or not..

I would probably go with a Leupold scope, unless you have a reason not to.
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 04:53 PM   #8
LionHunter
Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 94
I have the standard 8 3/4" in both the 500 and 460. I wouldn't pay the premium for the Custom Shop guns as these X-Frames are really accurate out of the box. The Warne mount is installed by removing the rear sight, putting the mount in place and re-installing the rear sight. A very simple operation and it allows you to remove the scope and use the iron sights, if necessary.

I have Leupold scopes on almost all my firearms and it would do well for you. I just like the firefly and rainguard features on the Bushnell. I use quick detachable rings and also have an EOTech I use if hunting in heavy brush where quick shots are required.

And yes, your point of impact will change with the different loads.

Good luck, and let us know what you go with.
LionHunter is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 05:12 PM   #9
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
I am mulling over the financing as I type and wondering what I have that I can part with to raise some cash...

I can see you are sold on the Warnes, and by your various posts, I can respect that. Do you have any experience with the S-W mount that can be viewed at

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...roductId=50493

Looks as if you can shoot sights under the scope. Again, no experience in this game, so forgive the questions.
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart

Last edited by davlandrum; January 28, 2008 at 05:13 PM. Reason: fixed link
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 08:01 PM   #10
Rembrandt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 10, 2002
Posts: 1,863
When using a handgun at longer distances remember in handgun calibers the trajectory is like a rainbow. Bullet drop is significant when going beyond 50 yards. Best to select the range you're proficient at and find a mulie at that distance. Several ways to judge this, use a range finder or know what the deer will look like in relationship to the crosshairs. Practice at this range until you can consistantly get about 6-8" groups.

Elmer Kieth took game with a .44mag at 600 yards. I'm no Elmer Kieth, but I have taken Antelope and Mulies out to 200 yards with a .44 mag. It's all about your skill level and proficientcy. My favorites are the Desert Eagle and Performance Center .44.

Rembrandt is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 08:27 PM   #11
LionHunter
Member
 
Join Date: December 19, 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 94
The Warne base was recommended to me by the S&W Chief of the X-Frame design team. I used the Warne quick release rings so that I couls remove the scope quickly if needed or to replace it with the EOTech if desired. Many mounts and scopes would not hold up to the recoil of the heavy 500 magnum rounds, but the Warne did. He also spoke highly of the Bushnell 3200 Elite as a scope that also took the recoil without damage. He had a room full of damaged scopes that could not hold up. This was a few years ago, prior to S&W making their own mounts and rings. I have no experience with the S&W mount/rings.

By way of experience, I have taken a new world record #1 Red Duiker, a #3 Puku, a #1 Chobe Bushbuck and a Cape Buffalo in Africa, all with the S&W X-Frame revolver.

Yeah, I really, really like the S&W X-Frame revolvers. Currently have 3 and thinking about another if I sell the 8 3/8" 500.
LionHunter is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 10:27 PM   #12
22-rimfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,594
Your choice depends on your experience level with the bigger recoiling handguns. Lots of choices. I generally feel the 454 Casull is more power (hence recoil) than you need for deer or most 4-legged animals. I used a Smith Model 57 8 3/8" (41 mag) for a number of years. I always felt capable to 100 yds if I needed to. My current handgun is a Ruger Super Redhawk (SRH) in 480 Ruger. It is a good caliber. Check into it. The SRH is one of the least expensive of the big bore handguns. 44 mag will work, but I wouldn't choose a SRH for that caliber. I'm currently thinking about a BFR revolver in 475 Linebaugh/480 Ruger but I will probably shoot it mostly in 480. Enjoy.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old January 28, 2008, 10:58 PM   #13
TCman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 512
AMT automag 3 might be what you are looking for. It is chambered in .30 carbine. Less recoil than my XD45
__________________
Il keep my freedom, my guns, and my money. You can keep the change.
TCman is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 11:47 AM   #14
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
I owned and shot a Ruger .44 mag Super Redhawk for several years, but was not interested in using it for hunting back then and eventually sold it (). So I am not recoil shy. But how much more recoil is there stepping from the 44 Mag to the .454 or the .460?

Man, it never ceases to amaze me how many smart people are on this board!!

I started to do some preliminary work with WildAlaska on purchasing.....
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 11:54 AM   #15
Nevertoomanyguns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 5, 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 213
Ruger Super Blackhawk hunter .44 mag at 100 yards


This is a picture of my first group from my blackhawk hunter. I fired 2 cylinders (12 shots) at 100 yards from a kneeling position resting my none firing elbow on my knee. The 8 ring is 8 inches and all but one landed in it. The flier was the last shot out of the second cylinder and I felt myself flinch on it. I used the iron sights on it, I do have a scope but I can't get use to it and I find that at the average distance that I will be shooting at whitetails in my area I do not need a scope and I shoot better without the scope.

I was shooting pretty hot hand loads of 255gr gas checked cast performance bullets over h110 using mag primers. I have become a lot better with it the more I practice. I would rather shoot a buck at the 50 to 70 yard range but I feel confident enough that if I take my time and focus and make that first shot count I can kill a buck at 100 yards. I recommend the gun if you like single actions it handles recoil very well. There is also a bisley hunter too if you like that grip better. I was going to shoot my Maine moose last season with it but I never came across a bull.

I think the .460 and 500 are cool but are not needed at 100 yards for deer. Hey but if you like them use them.
Nevertoomanyguns is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 12:00 PM   #16
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,443
The trajectory of a .44 Mag isn't particularly bad for 100-yard shots. Without looking at the tables, I'd figure on a 75-yard zero, giving approximately a 125-yard "point it and pull" capability.

240-grain, big meplat.

And practice with lighter loads until you can pretty much always hit a beer can at 100 yards. Get yourself "all married up" with the gun.

Art
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 01:10 PM   #17
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
NeverTooManyGuns - nice shooting!

Art - As always, on time - on target, Thanks.

BTW - what is meplat

I figure I will shoot the heck out of it with the .45 LC for form and function and then move up to the .454 and the .460s.

Looks like time to get some new reloading dies for my buddy...
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 04:43 PM   #18
Bitmap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2001
Posts: 388
There are plenty of revolvers capable of taking deer at 100 yards. Any S&W M29 or M629, or X-frame. Any Ruger Redhawk, Super Redhawk, or Blackhawk in an appropriate caliber.

The question is not whether the handgun is accurate enough. The question is are you accurate enough.

Lot's of practice. Some people may not be able to do it even with lot's of practice. Especially older folks whose eyes aren't what they used to be.

I've shot one deer with a handgun. One round at 92 yards with an iron-sighted M500 S&W. No, a .500 isn't needed on deer, but I shot very well with that particular handgun. No doubt the long sight radius and very nice trigger helped. Typical groups at 100 yards are 4" to 6" for 3 rounds. Not like shooting a rifle, but it's good enough for deer, at least if they are in the open.

I'd suggest whichever brand of revolver you like in .44 Magnum or .454 Casull and lots of practice. After a little while you'll find out just how far you can shoot well enough to kill a deer with it. I can tell you that it will spice up your hunting.
Bitmap is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 05:00 PM   #19
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
Bitmap - good reason to spend more time on the range!

I bow hunt elk every year, so understand the "know your limit" rule of shooting.

I am seriously in need of some "spice". Last year, my deer season lasted 1/2 hour: get up, cup of coffee, head out, see buck, 30-06, bang, done.

LionHunter - do you use speed loaders or ??
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 05:26 PM   #20
jhgreasemonkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2006
Location: 46.199ºN 122.188ºW by way of Tacoma Wa
Posts: 2,236
It's true Elmer Keith took game at 600yds with his .44 mag. He also was partial to open sights. I dont use my revolver for anything over 75-100yards. I suppose if it was scoped I might. My deer revolver is a ruger redhawk .44mag with open sights 5.5". It sure is handy for toting around the woods.
__________________
S&W 5906 9mm, FN commercial Mauser .270 win, Winchester 94 .30-30, Ruger Redhawk .44 mag, Ruger 10/22 .22lr, Ruger P-95 9mm, Savage 110 .30-06, Norinco SKS 7.62x39mm
I support our constitutional right to arm bears.
jhgreasemonkey is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 05:31 PM   #21
22-rimfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,594
Using a handgun as your primary deer gun will definitely spice up your hunts. It's like bow hunting with just a bit more reach. Since you might consider elk hunting with the handgun, I opt for something in 480 Ruger, 454 Casull, 460 S&W or 500 S&W. The 454 kicks alot. The 500 is tolerable to about 300 or so gr loads. Never shot a 460. You have to practice often with these as you are not likely to shoot many shots in a given shooting session. That is one of the strong pluses of using a 41 or 44 mag revolver as you can practice more and improve your shooting skills.

Not taking anything away from Elmer Keith and his shooting abilities, but he primarily used handguns for targets of opportunity rather than his primary gun on a hunt. As I recall, he walked his shots into the game at 600 yds. I believe that was a carbou. He shot a lot.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 06:18 PM   #22
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
Sorry, didn't mean to limit responses to just one peson - do any of you who hunt with a handgun use speed loaders or ?? Not that I am thinking "rapid reload", more just about carrying extra rounds.

Bitmap - "probably" (famous last words) will stick with bowhunting for elk. The unit we hunt is over-the-counter tags for bow elk, no drawing. Been hunting the same piece of ground enough years to know it well and there are a lot of elk (since I never kill any...).

I am pretty sure I am going to the SW 460. I will pick up bulk .45 LC to shoot the heck out of, then step up.

Ready for hunting ammo suggestions now....
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 06:53 PM   #23
Bitmap
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2001
Posts: 388
Quote:
It's true Elmer Keith took game at 600yds with his .44 mag.
The way I recall it, from reading "Hell, I was there." is that it was a mule deer with one leg broken running away and likely to escape. He had nothing to loose by shooting at it. That is a little different than shooting at an unwounded animal.

Still, hitting it with 2 out of 4 shots is amazing.
Bitmap is offline  
Old January 29, 2008, 09:04 PM   #24
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,443
The meplat is the flat part of the nose of a bullet. Per Ross Seyfried, larger is better. IIRC, he prefers hard-cast lead over jacketed.

Jim Wilson at Shooting Times magazine (online) is pretty good about answering such questions about ammo type. Lord knows, he does enough handgun hunting. (I just wish he'd finish his second CD and finish his book.)

Art
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old January 30, 2008, 01:05 AM   #25
TexasSeaRay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 810
NeverTooManyGuns,

Very good shooting, sir. Very good.

Jeff
__________________
If every single gun owner belonged to the NRA as well as their respective state rifle/gun association, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in today.

So to those of you who are members of neither, thanks for nothing.
TexasSeaRay is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13558 seconds with 7 queries