The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Gear and Accessories

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 2, 2007, 12:50 PM   #1
woodland
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2001
Location: western wa.
Posts: 566
Bushnell Holosight vs. EO Tech...

Ok, I know that the EO Tech is the top of the evolutionary tree for red dot sights. I agree with that. But, the Bushnell is almost identical, and looks the same when looking through it. However, the Bushnell is a fair bit cheaper. I am looking for a sight to put on my patrol carbine for work, and I am working with a bit of a budget.

SO! If I went with the Bushnell, would I have any regrets? Realistically, (and hopefully!) it will be used mostly for training. I am not on the TAC team or anything, and if used for real it would be a baricade situation or for an active shooter. The ones I have looked at seem to be of pretty high quality.

Any experiences with them would be greatly appreciated, both good and bad please! Thanks
__________________
"There is no spoon..."
woodland is offline  
Old December 2, 2007, 01:10 PM   #2
sholling
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 1999
Location: Hemet (middle of nowhere) California
Posts: 4,260
I can't answer your question but I can give you another question to ask. Do either produce any glow that can be seen from the front and act as an aiming point for a bad guy. I bring this up because it's something I've seen on a couple of red dot sights.
__________________
Proud Life Member: National Rifle Association, California Rifle & Pistol Association, and the Second Amendment Foundation.
Annual Member: Revolutionary War Veterans Association (Project Appleseed) and the Madison Society.
sholling is offline  
Old December 2, 2007, 01:46 PM   #3
VUPDblue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,978
The EOTech and the Holosight are made by the same machines. The difference being, that there is not a Holosight that is night-vision compatible and that the Holosight does not have the armored housing that the EOTech does. I had one of each, and there was no practical difference. I traded them both for Aimpoints, as I really didn't like the "donut of death" reticle. All that said, you should be happy with the Bushnell for your intended purpose as long as you don't abuse it.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal !
VUPDblue is offline  
Old December 2, 2007, 02:22 PM   #4
TDSUS
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2007
Posts: 7
If budget is the prime motivation, then yeah the Bushnell is the way to go.
The EoTech is more designed for rougher treatment but as stated earlier, they are made on the same machines - same circuits.

Without making a shameless sales pitch, let me know what your looking for and we'll see if we can make a LEO deal.
__________________
Tactical Defense Solutions LLC
TDSUS is offline  
Old December 2, 2007, 08:09 PM   #5
ShipWreck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 9, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,743
The N Battery EOtech has a longer battery life than the 40 rated hours of the Bushnell.

Yes, it is essentially the same w/o the metal cage, though.

But, I will tell U - I accidentally hit my eotech against something once. If it were not for the metal cage - I would have broke the sight. It was worth it for me right there!
ShipWreck is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07279 seconds with 9 queries