The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 22, 2007, 09:28 PM   #1
LILTIKI
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2007
Location: michigan
Posts: 2
What Caliber Is Right

I"ve Been A Bow Hunter All My Life.(58 Yrs) I Now Want To Hunt With A Rifle. I Would Like To Know What Caliber Rife Would Be Most Appropriate For Hunting Elk And Mule Deer. I Would Like The Smallest Caliber Possible Yet Have Enough Power As To Not Worry.



Dick
LILTIKI is offline  
Old October 22, 2007, 09:30 PM   #2
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,421
.270 Winchester would be the smallest caliber I'd use since you mentioned elk. I've used it on elk and wouldn't be afraid to use it again. I like 150 grain Nosler partitions for elk and pretty much any 130 grain soft point will work for deer.
taylorce1 is offline  
Old October 22, 2007, 09:37 PM   #3
FirstFreedom
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
.270 winchester or .280 remington.
FirstFreedom is offline  
Old October 22, 2007, 10:00 PM   #4
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: Rhome, TX
Posts: 4,641
6.5x55 or up, although I tend to agree with the above recommendations as a better solution for elk.
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!
fisherman66 is offline  
Old October 22, 2007, 10:52 PM   #5
Yellowfin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2007
Location: West Upstate NY
Posts: 2,303
.30-06. There has not been anything invented which can do the job better in a wider variety of situations.
Yellowfin is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 01:09 PM   #6
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
+1 on the -06 as my preference, but I freely admit that is the "love of my life" caliber. Never even dated another caliber....
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 01:37 PM   #7
Full-choke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 10, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 617
If you get comfortable with the rifle and become a sure shot, I would say 257 Roberts would be a good choice. It will bring either of those two critters down pretty easily. Past that, 270 would be a good choice, -06 is versatile, and a little bigger.

I would say given everything you offered on info, 257 or the 270 will suite just fine.

F-C
__________________
TC Encore -6mm Rem Rifle; Ruger 10/22; Ruger 10/22 Ultimate; Stoeger Condor 20; ; Remington 1100 12; Stoeger 22 Luger; Taurus PT1911; Ruger SR40c
God gave us the gift of life. It is the most precious gift ever. To be unarmed is to be helpless to protect that gift; that is outright irresponsible. - Ted Nugent
Full-choke is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 01:38 PM   #8
hunter33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 289
280,270,06 will do great!
hunter33 is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 02:04 PM   #9
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
OK, the caliber I have a crush on is the .257 Roberts, mentioned by Full-choke.
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 03:13 PM   #10
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,421
I don't like the .257 calibers for elk for the simple reason they don't make a heavier than 120 grain loads. Plus I have to make a cut off some where or I'd go all the way down to a .243/6mm caliber with 80 grain bullet because that is the minimum I can hut with legally in Colorado as long has it has 1000 lb of energy at 100 yards.
taylorce1 is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 04:48 PM   #11
Geoff Timm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 18, 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 472
Elk to mule deer?

Gotta be .30-06. 220 gr for Elk and 150 - 125 gr for deer. No other cartridge has the range of bullet weights easily available.

Geoff
Who uses .308, but I don't go looking for elk.
Geoff Timm is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 04:53 PM   #12
davlandrum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
Geoff - 220 gr -06 for elk? Back in the day, I know that was the round, but with the performance of premium bullets now, 180 or even 165s will do just fine. Again, that is premium bullets.

Biggest elk I have ever seen killed was killed by a single shot from a .257 Bob.
__________________
U.S Army, Retired

Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart
davlandrum is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 05:35 PM   #13
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: Rhome, TX
Posts: 4,641
Quote:
Again, that is premium bullets.
BINGO, many cartridges that were unable to take large game decades ago now have a new lease in life due to modern bullet design. Just don't tell that the Scandinavian folk. They've been doing it for the last hundred years with what many here might consider "sub" guns.
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!
fisherman66 is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 05:52 PM   #14
RedneckFur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Location: Sotheastern US
Posts: 1,421
I'd go 270. The ammo is common enough you can find it most places, and its not too expensive. I'm one who tends to err on the small side when it comes to rifles. I personally wouldnt go any bigger than 30-06 unless you've got a trip to Africa in your near future.

Also... If youre a bow hunter, you're used to stalking close and making close range shots, I assume? If so, consider the 30-30! Its got plenty of power for mulies and elk within its range. Its quick to shoot, lightweight, leverguns to me are some of the most comfortable rifles to shoulder and shoot as well. Expect hunting ammo for it to be 2/3 to 1/2 the price of the 270 or 30-06
RedneckFur is offline  
Old October 23, 2007, 07:01 PM   #15
LILTIKI
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 22, 2007
Location: michigan
Posts: 2
wHAT CALIBER IS WRIGHT

Friends
First Of All I'd Like To Think Everybody For There Input On What Caliber I Might Use. I Have Access To The 270, 30-30 And The 30-06. I Guess I Will Be Spending Some Time Shooting At A Shooting Range To See What Gun I Can Handle The Best. Again, To Everybody, Thanks For Your Time And Thoughts.


Dick
LILTIKI is offline  
Old October 24, 2007, 04:57 AM   #16
CamoCop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 133
.30-06
CamoCop is offline  
Old October 24, 2007, 05:39 AM   #17
bswiv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: NE FL.......
Posts: 1,081
LILTIKI said it like a experenced hunter......................

He's going to take 3 guns to the range, all of which are up to the task at hand, and then he is going to do a very reasonable thing.

He's going to "see what gun I can handle the best."

Talk about a sound approach to the question........................!
bswiv is offline  
Old October 24, 2007, 07:03 AM   #18
king.460
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 26, 2007
Location: Hale County, AL
Posts: 103
If you still love the challenge of bowhunting but not the complexity of it, do what I did and take up handgun hunting. Great challenge and the blood trails are a lot shorter!
king.460 is offline  
Old October 24, 2007, 07:26 PM   #19
lockedcj7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2007
Posts: 964
If I wanted the lightest-kicking rifle that I'd still feel 100% confident with, I'd take my 7mm-08 loaded with the best premium bonded bullet I could get.

.270 win is almost ballistically identical and is a lot more common in backwoods grocery stores.
__________________
To a much greater extent than most mechanical devices, firearms are terribly unforgiving of any overconfidence, complacency or negligence.
lockedcj7 is offline  
Old October 24, 2007, 10:01 PM   #20
jrothWA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2006
Posts: 1,931
what are you comfortable shooting with?

I've talked with a Dad @ work who's twelve-year old took an Elk with a .243.

Can your shoulder stand the recoil of an 30-06 or above?

What caliber allows you keep all shots on a paper plate @ max range e.g.: 10, 150 or 200???

Jack O'Connor love and promoted the .270 Win, based on the 30-06 case,
look at the list from RCBS 30-06 leads the most popular caliber, meaning it will be readily available, 30/30 has been used on Elk but placement and range are critical.
The Swede's use the 6.5X55Mauser on Moose, again its placement.
Tell us more, so we can refine this.

PS, I use nothing but .308Win, not able to try Elk this year but will next.
jrothWA is offline  
Old October 24, 2007, 11:46 PM   #21
CamoCop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 2, 2006
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 133
a .30-06's recoil is not bad, you can buy bullets anywhere for it, it has a wider selection of bullets than any other caliber AND it will take down ALL North American game animals. need I explain more?
CamoCop is offline  
Old October 25, 2007, 05:39 PM   #22
jaymag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 4, 2005
Location: springfield,MA
Posts: 239
30-06 all the way!

Could stop a gobblin
jaymag is offline  
Old October 25, 2007, 06:38 PM   #23
jhgreasemonkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2006
Location: 46.199ºN 122.188ºW by way of Tacoma Wa
Posts: 2,236
I agree with the .270 win being the least I would use and not have to worry about it being underpowered. It is a great choice for elk and mule deer. Excellent long range performance and it deliveres a lot of energy.
I do however preffer the 30-06 even over the fantastic .270 because it does have that slight edge as it produces similar ballistics but with slightly larger and heavier bullets. And if you can shoot the .270 comfortably you probably wont notice a difference when shooting the 06.
__________________
S&W 5906 9mm, FN commercial Mauser .270 win, Winchester 94 .30-30, Ruger Redhawk .44 mag, Ruger 10/22 .22lr, Ruger P-95 9mm, Savage 110 .30-06, Norinco SKS 7.62x39mm
I support our constitutional right to arm bears.
jhgreasemonkey is offline  
Old October 25, 2007, 06:49 PM   #24
Jack O'Conner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2005
Location: Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,473
My wife is very fussy about recoil. But she does real well with a Browning BLR I had re-barreled to 6.5mm Swede. Within 275 yards accuracy and trajectory are about the same as 7mm-08 or 270 . The 140 grain bullet is a deep penetrator and hits harder than charts would suggest.

I'm no fan of recoil either. .308 has been a keeper for me!

Hope this is helpful.

Jack
__________________
Fire up the grill! Deer hunting IS NOT catch and release.
Jack O'Conner is offline  
Old October 25, 2007, 07:11 PM   #25
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: Rhome, TX
Posts: 4,641
Quote:
The 140 grain bullet is a deep penetrator and hits harder than charts would suggest.
A nice, high sectional density will do that on deep chested game.
__________________
la plus belle des ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas!
fisherman66 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.14025 seconds with 7 queries