The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Harley Nolden Memorial Institute for Firearms Research

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 14, 2007, 07:55 AM   #1
mega twin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 15, 2006
Posts: 428
remington .41 derringer

a friend brought me an old derringer to look at. it is a remington, with the ejector. the only no. I could find on it was a very small 12 stamped on the grip frame. I'm sure this could not be the serial no.,as I assume there were a bunch of these made.were these numbered back then? thanks, Mike
mega twin is offline  
Old January 14, 2007, 04:04 PM   #2
Snow Dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2005
Location: Too close to Toronto!
Posts: 106
Here's a good site to find a bit more info about the gun: http://www.littlegun.be/
Snow Dog is offline  
Old January 14, 2007, 09:57 PM   #3
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 20,027
If you can find one of those in decent condition with an uncracked hinge, treasure it. If you are offered one with a cracked hinge and told they are easy to fix, or can be welded, run away.

For some reason, Remington never changed the design or made the guns from anything but iron for the entire 68 year production period (1866-1934). They look neat, and everybody wants one, but they are very fragile and broke, even with original loads. So looking is fine, shooting is a no-no. Plus, if you want a compact defense gun, get something a lot more powerful, like the super power .25 ACP.

They were not serial numbered.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old January 15, 2007, 06:18 AM   #4
mega twin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 15, 2006
Posts: 428
He is looking to sell the gun, but I'm not a buyer. Old guns are neat,but I would rather have a shooter. I just cleaned it up some for him. It does seem loose at the hinge and on lock up, but having never held one before, I don't know what the norm is. thanks for the help guys , Mike
mega twin is offline  
Old August 13, 2008, 09:15 PM   #5
ebayguy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 13, 2008
Posts: 3
Need Help w/ .41 Derringer

My mother in law just gave me a Remington .41 Cal Derringer that belonged to her mother. The one hinge is missing, and the other is broken. Can they be fixed? Also, is there a piece missing? I will explain. There seems to be a piece missing between the hammer, and the shells. It doesn't look like the little catch will hit either shell, let alone both. Is this suppose to fire both at the same time, or one, and then the other? Wasn't sure what this was until I Googled it. Please help. You may email me directly, or reply to this post. Ebayguy@hotmail.com.
ebayguy is offline  
Old August 14, 2008, 09:16 AM   #6
Hawg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 11,873
Are you talking about both parts of the hinge? It's doubtful it could be fixed, not reasonably anyway. Sounds like the extractor is missing. It fires one barrel at a time.
Hawg is offline  
Old August 14, 2008, 03:24 PM   #7
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 20,027
I will say it again. Those guns were made from cast iron, not steel. They can't be easily welded, brazed or soldered, and attempts to do so almost always fail, usually leaving the gun looking worse than it did before.

The number is an assembly/batch number, not a serial number.
Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old August 14, 2008, 06:10 PM   #8
elrod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2007
Location: Heart of the heart of Dixie
Posts: 235
.....but it will make a dandy trotline weight..........
__________________
Freedom ain't free!
elrod is offline  
Old August 16, 2008, 05:33 PM   #9
robroy15
Member
 
Join Date: March 30, 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40
The father of one of my college buddies shot and killed a man with one of these Remington Derringers. In about 1947, I believe. They did serve a purpose, under desperate conditions.

I would not like to fire one of these.
robroy15 is offline  
Old October 11, 2009, 02:05 PM   #10
DavidFagan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Posts: 11
Minor quick tidbits on the dd for reference.

If it has the markings on the rib in the side or a "two-line" on top it is a type I, on the side is a 1st model, on the top 2nd model. (E. Remington)
If there is a on line address on the top (Remington Arms) this is a Type II, third model (unless it includes UMC) which it becomes a type III 4th model, if the rib is gone it's a mono-block (quite scared) it's a 5th model.

Type I, 1st model's are serials. (Around 2,000 made, 3 actual variations)
Type I, 2nd model are NOT serials, two runs (~18,000) made from 1-9999 and then repeated.
Type II, 3rd model has 6 variations, the 1st variation is a serial number this is referred to as a "short-line" because of the obvious words start and end 1/2 or so from sight/hinge (others are 1/4 or so). They made approximately 3,000 of these, they are simply serials because they change the variation before they started the run from 1-9999, repeat, repeat.
Type III Remington UMC's, they have real serials (although at the end they got a bit goofy with letters), starting in 1921 they also marked the month/date code on the lug under the barrel.
DavidFagan is offline  
Old October 11, 2009, 02:19 PM   #11
Sarge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 4,911
I have always had a weakness for these little guns but not to the extent of sacrificing 'working guns' in order to own one. As Jim has noted they are a wall-hanger of the first water and for those who simply must have a derringer to shoot, there are a number of more modern versions available in about any caliber you could fancy.

I'm glad that some of you have snarfed these up and I commend you for preserving a unique firearms artifact from days gone by.
__________________
I'm inclined to think if a man hasn't gotten his point across in 4912 attempts, 4913 probably isn't going to do it.
Sarge is offline  
Old October 11, 2009, 08:58 PM   #12
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 20,027
I have fired them (I know, do as I say...) and most folks just don't realize they have a spring more suitable to a Ford truck. In the movies, the guy with the derringer always snaps off a couple of fast shots, but either he was using another make, or his Remington had been worked on.

Just FWIW, it is a lot harder to ignite a rim fire round than a center fire since the hammer has to smash a layer of metal strong enough to withstand the pressure inside the cartridge. That explains both why hammer springs on old rimfires are so strong, and also why there are no large caliber high pressure rimfires. If a rimfire case were made strong enough to stand up to the pressures of a .357 Magnum, it would require a massive hammer and spring to set it off.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old October 12, 2009, 01:21 AM   #13
Powermwt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2000
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 269
Here is my Third Model, 1st issue (1888-1910).







I have seen lots of these derringers... blued, nickel, both, engraved and even gold plated but the purple/brown finish on the frame of this one I have not seen. Does anyone know if this was a factory finish?

If no one knows about this finish who or where can I ask about it.

This goes back in my family to at least the 1930s.
Powermwt is offline  
Old October 12, 2009, 01:59 AM   #14
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 7,226
Cast iron sometimes turns purple when reblued.
__________________
Bill DeShivs
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old October 12, 2009, 03:15 PM   #15
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 20,027
I think Bill has the answer. I can't see your first two pics but the gun in the last one shows signs of having been reblued.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old October 13, 2009, 03:26 PM   #16
DavidFagan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Posts: 11
Also it is a 2nd Type, III Model, and NOT a first issue, a first issue (variation) is a short-line. Also based on production numbers it's somewhere between 1891-1912 the short-line was basically the first three years (3022 produced) and then there is 5 other variations which I would not swear to the order of. Doug's book may I don't remember but if it does I respectfully disagree.
DavidFagan is offline  
Old October 14, 2009, 04:53 PM   #17
Powermwt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2000
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 269
I will first say I don't know much about the Remington Derringers except what I have read. I looked at, "The History of Remington Firearms" By Roy M. Marcot starting on page 30.

http://books.google.com/books?id=jAm...age&q=&f=false

Is Marcot wrong in his discription of the models or did I interpet the markings wrong?

Thanks Bill, I thought it had been refinished as it looked too good to be original... as well as purple.

Oh, number on the underside of barrels and left frame under grip match... 7xx.
Powermwt is offline  
Old October 14, 2009, 08:10 PM   #18
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 20,027
I don't know what happened but I can now see those first two pics by powermwt.

That gun has not only been reblued, it has been ground and polished to the point that it almost has a "melted" appearance. Possibly it was heavily rusted at one time and the polishing was necessary to remove rust. Too bad.

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old October 15, 2009, 04:39 PM   #19
DavidFagan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Posts: 11
Ok, so I pulled my complimentary copy from the author

So Roy only lists 4 variations there are 6 variations, three of which have the same writing but the font's are different. The first being the "short-line" and this is not it. I have to pull Doug's book. I believe I still have the pre-print when I proofed the book and it may have the nice photo of the tops of all the barrels showing the variations. Have to dig.

Ok easier to find then I thought...


Last edited by DavidFagan; October 15, 2009 at 04:56 PM.
DavidFagan is offline  
Old October 15, 2009, 07:38 PM   #20
James K
Staff
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 20,027
I'll leave open the question as to whether the use of a new roll stamp constitutes a "variation", but are there other changes, internal or external, in the gun over the years?

Jim
__________________
Jim K
James K is offline  
Old October 15, 2009, 08:30 PM   #21
DavidFagan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Posts: 11
Do you mean variation vs issue? This designations were probably made before I was born I just go with what is commonly accepted by collectors of these pieces. Even the Blue Book and Flayderman's differ on the terminology. The Type's were based on the company's owner, E. Remington, Remington Arms, and Remington UMC, that makes sense I guess. The Model is markings significantly different and forced when the maker changed.
Type I From the sides (with 3 variations)
Manufactured by ... This is the first 200 where Remington actually made them for Elliot and hadn't purchased the rights to (only 24 known to exist). The rest of the serials up to about 2,000 didn't have the manufactured by. Somewhere late in the game but not by serial I guess just what was on the shelf left or maybe sent back I believe all however after 1600 and there's also not a heck of a lot of them out there, they cut in ejector which of course cut in to the patent information. I assume that's why they went to the two-line address on the top (still 1st type 2nd model).
From then on it was one line on top.
Anyhow for changes in each Type you can see that the hinges kept getting larger and larger which is of course the weak spot and something you need to always check if buying one. There is also changes in the mechanism that controls the firing pin and spring. I don't remember off-hand exactly when changes were made, I'm not sure if this is even in a book or I would just have to go take some apart.
As for other visible changes, other then hinge size, and roll stamp the III type 5th Model nicknamed a mono-block there is no rib.
Here is a picture, they made 500 of this model, this is actually the only one known to exist in original nickel the majority of type III's are blue (look black) this is also the last serial no known to exist.
DavidFagan is offline  
Old November 1, 2009, 07:04 PM   #22
Matchlock
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 1, 2009
Posts: 4
Remington .41 Derringer

Hello to David Fagan;

I too have a Remington Derringer in .41 cal. and it has the exact same lettering as the fourth one down in your terrific photo of the six top straps. Mine is in blue and is in what we would call excellent condition. The blueing is (I belive), original, but with black plastic grips that have a Franzite "silver" medallion in them. There is also a flying eagle with what appears to be a shield on the medallion.

If anyone could give me an idea of this Derringer's worth it would be most appreciated.

I've heard they go anywhere from a badly broken one at $500.00 right on up to excellent condition for $2700.00 is this true or was someone writing a web site full of misinformation.

Many thanks for any information. Oh, and the number stamped under the grips on the right side of the piece is 668

Thanks again.

Last edited by Matchlock; November 1, 2009 at 07:14 PM.
Matchlock is offline  
Old November 13, 2009, 12:44 PM   #23
John76248
Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2009
Location: Embarrassed to be from Texas
Posts: 62
I have one of these also. I inherited it. I will post pics soon. It has very dirty bores but the hinge is good. Nickel is above average, at least I think so. Plastic grips have hunk busted off. I am glad I saw this thread.
__________________
If my post offends you there must be some truth in my post!
John76248 is offline  
Old November 14, 2009, 05:23 AM   #24
John76248
Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2009
Location: Embarrassed to be from Texas
Posts: 62
Here is mine after closer exam of the pictures I believe mine has a cracked hinge. Hard to see with the naked eye (sucks getting old). Any and all thoughts are welcomed!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC01347.jpg (236.9 KB, 302 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01353.jpg (220.2 KB, 238 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01355.jpg (244.6 KB, 231 views)
__________________
If my post offends you there must be some truth in my post!
John76248 is offline  
Old November 14, 2009, 05:25 AM   #25
John76248
Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2009
Location: Embarrassed to be from Texas
Posts: 62
more pics
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC01356.jpg (242.6 KB, 207 views)
File Type: jpg DSC01358.jpg (219.4 KB, 162 views)
__________________
If my post offends you there must be some truth in my post!
John76248 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.14476 seconds with 8 queries