The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 25, 2000, 10:25 AM   #1
Bandito
Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2000
Posts: 15
I've gotten conflicting opinions on this so looking for MORE opinions

Do you normally use load data for lead bullets of similar weight and apply that to loading electroplated bullets or do you use jacketed bullet load data?

------------------
Rick
"The incognito Bandit at work"
Bandito is offline  
Old October 25, 2000, 03:14 PM   #2
Reg
Member
 
Join Date: January 13, 2000
Posts: 54
Use starting loads for jacketed bullets.
Reg is offline  
Old October 25, 2000, 04:45 PM   #3
KilgorII
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have always treated them as jacketed bullets. 4.3 grains of Tight Group for 9mm 115 grain RN. This is not a really hot load and I have never seen any problems with it.
 
Old October 25, 2000, 08:17 PM   #4
Guy B. Meredith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 1999
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 1,578
The copper plated bullets seem to be in between jacketed and lead. You can use a heavier lead load or min jacketed load to start.

Rainier has data on their site for two or three brands of powder. I find these 'way light for the 158 gr RNCP West Coast Bullets I use with a taper crimp. I would be interested in comments on how to get the performance with less powder.
Guy B. Meredith is offline  
Old October 26, 2000, 04:33 PM   #5
Calif Hunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 10, 2000
Location: La Palma, CA, USA
Posts: 165
I've always just used the jacketed bullet data in .45 acp, .38 spl, .357 mag, .41 mag and .44 mag. The only loads that might have been considered "hot", though, were the magnum loads with W-296 or H-110. There aren't any light loads, really, with those two powders. I never noticed any problems or particularly dirty bores or poor accuracy to indicate that there were any problems. Since the majority of my handgun shooting is at an indoor range, I gave up on those powders due to roar and blast and went back to Blue Dot, Herco, Unique, 2400, etc.
Calif Hunter is offline  
Old October 27, 2000, 07:00 AM   #6
HowardK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 1999
Posts: 100
I just posed the same question to Berry's yesterday. The answer was use load data for lead bullets.
HowardK is offline  
Old October 27, 2000, 01:14 PM   #7
KODB
Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2000
Posts: 81
I agree with using the jacketed data and conservatively working up. I've had good sucess with this and have not seen any pressure/OP problems. Hodgon has some data in their manuals for 9mm that I've tried and has worked well.

Regards,
Bob
KODB is offline  
Old October 28, 2000, 01:59 PM   #8
jtduncan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 1999
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 1,681
I've used them both and have always had great accuracy with the starting point for the FMJ specs.

------------------
The Seattle SharpShooter - TFL/GT/UGW/PCT/KTOG
jtduncan is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07813 seconds with 7 queries