The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Dave McCracken Memorial Shotgun Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 3, 2006, 10:16 AM   #1
moonstone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2004
Posts: 120
knoxx COPstock?

Anybody have one of these? I'm a 5'1" female and I'm concerned about the length.
moonstone is offline  
Old September 3, 2006, 01:44 PM   #2
RoscoeC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2006
Location: DFW Metromess
Posts: 554
I have not had any experience with the Cop Stock, but I have a Remington 870 with the Spec Ops stock. It is adjustable in length, so should take care of your concern about length. Just shorten it. It uses the same recoil mechanism as the Cop Stock, I believe. It couldn't be made as compact as the folder, but fully collapsed, with an 18" barrel, it isn't bad.
__________________
“Life is either a daring adventure or nothing." --Helen Keller
"Do not cry havoc when you should but hunt with modest warrant." --William Shakespeare
Glock Certified Armorer
NRA Life Member
RoscoeC is offline  
Old September 3, 2006, 05:41 PM   #3
'75Scout
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 3, 2005
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 817
The SpecOps stock work better than the Copstock. It has two recoil reducing mechanisms.
'75Scout is offline  
Old September 3, 2006, 06:03 PM   #4
moonstone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2004
Posts: 120
I looked at the SpecOps but this is my first shotgun and I want to keep the pistol grip only option. With the Copstock, it would be like having two guns.
moonstone is offline  
Old September 4, 2006, 02:23 PM   #5
RoscoeC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2006
Location: DFW Metromess
Posts: 554
Just my opinion, but here it is, free of charge of course. A shotgun is meant to be a shoulder fired weapon, and is at its best when used that way. Unless you are going to be using it at extremely close quarters, I don't see a lot of value in the pistol grip only option. The idea that a shotgun doesn't need to be carefully aimed is a myth. At very close quarters, a good pistol and the knowlege of how to use it would serve you better. As I say, just my opinion...you will get others that are diametrically opposed, but this is my thinking.
__________________
“Life is either a daring adventure or nothing." --Helen Keller
"Do not cry havoc when you should but hunt with modest warrant." --William Shakespeare
Glock Certified Armorer
NRA Life Member
RoscoeC is offline  
Old September 4, 2006, 02:41 PM   #6
webbee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 1, 2005
Posts: 218
I've shot both and the CopStock takes enough of the recoil out, as long as the wire frame is pressed firmly into the shoulder. I really like accurately shooting slugs one-handed with the CopStock. I would suggest you put it on either an 870 or a Winny 1200/1300 because of their trigger guard safety locations. Mossberg puts their safety on the receiver which becomes awkward with the Cop/SpecOps stocks. If your worried about LOP, the one I have is almost 10" extended from the PG cap to the end of the wire stock. I don't think you will have any problems, even with slugs, from CopStock usage. If you don't like it, you can always sell it, as there are a lot of people with interest in the CopStock. For a HD weapon the 18.5" barrel is probably the preferred length.
webbee is offline  
Old September 4, 2006, 03:46 PM   #7
moonstone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2004
Posts: 120
Thanks Webbee, that length is what I was looking for.
moonstone is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08896 seconds with 7 queries