August 29, 2006, 10:02 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: August 12, 2006
Posts: 33
|
9mm Revolver??
Anybody have a clue as to the performance and recoil of a 9mm in a snubnose (<3") revolver?
VS a .38spl? (I am interested in a comparison of the calibers and felt recoil.) |
August 29, 2006, 10:12 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2005
Posts: 156
|
Mr. .38 Special is perfecto
9mm is nice - but the .38 is perfection.
|
August 29, 2006, 10:16 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 28, 2006
Location: South dakota
Posts: 674
|
If the .38 is perfection, why'd they invent the .357 magnum?
SW |
August 29, 2006, 10:44 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 30, 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 2,156
|
I've shot a friends S&W 547 3" at the range. I was firing my 66-4 3" that day. He wanted to swap for a few cylinders full. The 547 was shooting WWB 9mm, and the 66 was shooting WWB 38's. The 547 was a little louder, and snappier in recoil, IMHO. Accuracy was on par. As for carrying a 9mm revolver, personally I would not. To me the advantages of a 9mm handgun, are capacity, and concealability. With the revolver you give those up, to an extent. When I carry a revolver, it's always a 357, loaded with 158 grain 357's. When I carry a 9mm as a primary or a BUG, it's a S&W 3913, with 8+1 Ranger 124 grain bonded. I'm a revolver guy. If I'm on my own time, 90% of it, I've got the M66 3" on me. 357 just works, again IMHO. I do like 9mm, and with my 3913 I'm well armed. For CCW with a 9mm revolver that you can get hits with, and you train with it, and it fits your hand, you will be well armed too. Hope this helps. Regards 18DAI.
|
August 29, 2006, 10:54 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 25, 2005
Posts: 156
|
Why did they invent the 357 ?
Well, they needed the .357 to fire from a .38 revolver.
.357/.38's are hard to beat ! |
August 29, 2006, 11:08 PM | #6 |
Junior member
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Posts: 879
|
Been bouncing around the forums.The sticking point seems to be 9mm. revolvers with clips for the cartridges.It seems that sticky extraction after firing is causing problems.Besides,got a look at the Taurus 905 ones and they seem flimsy.Bend and twist real easy.I'm prejudiced anyway.Own two .357 Mags and one.38 snubbie.
|
August 30, 2006, 06:23 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
Snubby: 9x19mm outperforms .357 Mag & .38 Special.
As any autopistolcartridge, the 9x19mm cartridge suffers much less performance loss in shorter barrels.
It always outperforms the .38 special and outperforms the .357 in barrels shorter than 3". If you don't believe me. Get the guns and a chronometer and find out yourself. In a snubby revolver, the 9x19mm cartdrige makes much more sense than the .357 Magnum or the .38 Special.
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
August 30, 2006, 07:19 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Posts: 189
|
[In a snubby revolver, the 9mm makes much more sense...]
If that were true, then I imagine the several attempts S&W, just to name one firm, made to market a 9mm revolver would have been successful, as opposed to discontinued, right??? I know what you're trying to say (and its chronoGRAPH, BTW... ), but velocity is not always king. Tha MAIN reason 9mm revolvers have not been more popular has already been mentioned; the rimless case poses several problems. Putting that aside, consider the fact that both cartridges- 9mm and .38 Special- use the same bullet size (for all practical purposes). But the .36 Special CASE has nearly twice the volumn of the 9mm. Cutting to the chase, a .38 Special +P cartridge can push a heavier bullet, of superior design (SWC), as fast or faster than a 9mm can. Unless you just like to tinker and load your own, a 9mm revolver with clips is a real PITA to mess with; and I base that opinion on watching several cops with them, on the range. I've been carrying a .38 snubby as a back-up/off duty piece for almost 30 years. While I have not had to use mine (thank goodness), I HAVE helped investigate several shootings with them. At the ranges (i.e., close) that this gun is meant to be employed at, it does the job just fine. A 9mm version would probably do just as well. But the rimless cartridge complicates things in a revolver; and for self-defense, simpler is better... always. |
August 30, 2006, 07:32 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: November 11, 2004
Posts: 98
|
I own, shoot and carry a Taurus 905IB 9mm revolver. This little thing has a 1 7/8" barrel and a five shot capacity. The recoil is a bit more than 38's and a little more than 38+p's. No game comparing the 357 mag and the 9mm, it's the 357 all the way!!. This little gem uses a "stellar" clip to load the rounds, but it is not needed, as you can fire the rounds off w/o the clip, but the extraction is via a thin rod or stick w/o the clip. I've never had a tough/hard casing to extract after firing, either with or w/o the clip. I load my own 9mm and the 1000+ rounds I've put thru this gem were mostly ball, fmj or plated bullets, 115 grain up to 147 grain. The loading were as close to my SD ammo as I could get, so I would have the same feeling shooting the reloads vs the SD ammo. It conceals very well, a tad better than a 38 snub, at least I feel that it does. I use this firearm for CCW and my truck gun, so it does take a beating. So far after more than a 1.5 yrs. and like I mentioned above 1000+
rounds it still keeps shooting and at a fair to moderate POA/POI, distance being around 10'-20'. Also, this is a DOA revolver, one with a bobbed hammer from the factory. Sure would like to find a Ruger Sp101, Speed Six in 9mm. |
August 30, 2006, 02:18 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
LSP972
Just do the math and read the tests. The volume of the .38 cartridge has nothing to do with it's capability. It used to be a blackpowder cartridge and the length of it's case is obsolete these days. .38Spec gas pressure limits just limit the amount of powder used so the cartdridge these days is quite empty. Even a 9x19mm cartdride is only half-full of powder. You can easily put two powderloads into a 9x19mm cartdride and blow your gun apart. And the reason why 9x19mm revolvers are not selling well is that people who go for 9x19mm go for an auto (eg Glock 26, same size as S&W 60 and more than double the capacity...). And: Heavy Bullets mean nothing. The best .357 Mag Bullet is a 125grainer. The best 9x19mm bullets are the 93gr EMB, the 100gr FL and the 124gr EFMJ. Read Jim Cirillo on slow and heavy .38Spec bullets... But hey, if you love your loooong cartrige for the sheer length of it - that's ok!
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
August 30, 2006, 02:40 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Posts: 98
|
"It always outperforms the .38 special"
Take your chronograph and look at the data which will show you that it's just not true. Of course the 9mm will be faster, much faster. But it has a puny 115 gr bullet compared to the 158 gr .38 bullet. If you take real world velocities of 115 gr and 158 gr bullets and do the math.. the 9mm ends up with 10% more energy. Considering momentum and that momentum has a lot to do with penetration both rounds are equal as velocity isn't squared in the momentum equation. Every test so far has shown that 9mm and .38 +P are in the same league. Many times the .38 penetrates far more into gel. blocks. Of course 9mm revolvers would make sense.. but only from a cost perspective as the round is cheaper. And by choosing .38 ammo.. one has to pick the right ammo as there is a 50-60% energy difference between the slowest and the hottest brands. IMHO the 9mm is a crappy round. 115 gr is not enough. Then again I don't want anything supersonic. So no .357. I like the .40 S&W more and more. If there only was an equivalent revolver round.. |
August 31, 2006, 05:32 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
Snubbies
we are talking snubbies here. So we have to compare 2.5" Revolvers (barrel starts after the Bullet) and 3,5" Autos (barrel starts with primer).
In this league the 9x19mm comes even very close to the .357 Magnum and always outperforms the .38. The 9x19mm is by no means limited to 115gr. There is a lot of great 147gr defense ammo and even 158 gr bullets are on the market, if you prefer heavy bullets... A .38 from a snub is very unlikely to penetrate anything hard like a skull etc. Many real life shootings showed that. Jim Cirillo wrote a stunning eposiode on that in one of his books... But hey, you like the .38, stay with it. If you like it, you will handle it well and that's the most important factor.
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
August 31, 2006, 01:00 PM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Posts: 98
|
You mean Glock26 vs. S&W 637 or 442?
3.5" vs. 1 7/8" 20 ozs vs. 15 ozs empty 26 ozs vs. 18 ozs loaded The revolver has the better shape, better conceilability. IMO the Glock 26 is comparable to a 3" Model 60. 1 oz heavier, 1" longer and still the better shape compared to the Glock. I calculated the energy values in Joule as i guess you're from Europe. Results for the .38 (2" barrel): Rem 125gr jhp +p 916 fps 316J Win 158gr lhp+p 798 fps 303J Rem 158gr lhp+p 788 fps 295J Fed 158gr lhp +p 801 fps 305J Fed 158gr rnl 604 fps 173J Results for the Glock: Fiocchi 115 1072 fps 398J Speer 147 961 fps 408J Speer +P 124 1192 fps 530J Yes, it's possible to get 3x the energy by choosing the 9mm +P. In reality nobody in theri right mind would choose the +P ammo. The most likely scenario is that the revolver guy ends up with the Winchester ammo and the Glock guy with the Fiocchi 115 gr ammo. 398 vs 303, 30% more. Momentum: only 2% more! The 9mm has perhaps 15% more penetration in the above scenario. I just don't see how anybody would choose one platform over the other only because of energy/penetration issues. With 3" the comparison would be much more in favor of the revolver and with full-sized guns (4" rev vs. Glock 17) the difference would be 10% (energy). |
August 31, 2006, 03:32 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 14, 2006
Posts: 189
|
"Doing the math" is fine; but, like statistics, numbers can fool you.
I am basing my opinions on real-world results, that I have SEEN; not my, or anyone else's, "tests". The .38 may be an old black powder cartridge; but so is the .45 Colt. You think that one is obsolescent, too? And, your categorization of which bullet does what tells me you are basing your opinions on what you've read. That's fine; but again, NOTHING in wound ballistics is a given. If you want to talk generalizations, more people in the United States have been killed with .22s than any other cartridge. Would YOU carry a .22 for a defensive piece? I didn't think so. |
September 1, 2006, 08:08 AM | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Posts: 8
|
Hi all,
I may have missed this in the list of postings, but I am still not sure why the 9mm (or any other rimless case) can't be easily adapted to a revolver design. These rimless cases successfully headspace in all auto chambers, so why can't revolver cylinders be designed to accept rimless cases? Forgive my ignorance, but wouldn't that be like having 5-6 auto chambers contained in one cylinder? I have just never understood the need for the half-moon clips if the rimless case can be supported at the shoulder. Thanks in advance for the education. Rgds, Marley |
September 1, 2006, 09:04 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2005
Location: Scranton Pa
Posts: 237
|
The Ruger .357/9mm convertion dosen't use moon clips. It uses a different cylinder. It has the push rod to eject the rounds. It's ok but a pain to zero in. I have one to have one, otherwize it's a Smith for .357/.38 and a (gulp) Glock 17 for 9mm. The Glock is a great weapon, by the way.
kid |
September 1, 2006, 01:27 PM | #17 | |
Junior member
Join Date: October 9, 2004
Location: Northeast Alabama
Posts: 2,580
|
Quote:
Last edited by smince; September 3, 2006 at 07:52 AM. |
|
September 2, 2006, 03:22 AM | #18 | ||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
oh yes, .22!
KOJAK, that's what I meant. We interpret it differently but that's fine for each of us, isn't it?
Quote:
Quote:
And, your categorization of which bullet does what tells me you are basing your opinions on what you've read. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So, even if it makes you shiver, I'd rather carry a .22 than a .38 Revolver. Sorry Quote:
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
||||||
September 2, 2006, 08:33 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 181
|
Here is an interesting article about the subject on the box of truth
2" 38 snubbie vs. Glock G26 and Glock G27 testing is done showing penetration of various rounds with plenty of pictures showing the expanded rounds etc. http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot27.htm |
September 2, 2006, 04:07 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Posts: 98
|
There you have it, the .38 Special penetrating 4 jugs, the 9mm penetrating only 3 jugs..
That means .38 special: 12" 9mm: 9" How is this possible? Simple, the 9mm has more energy and more speed. Look at the pictures, it expands much more then the .38 Speer GD. More expansion - more area - more resistance by the water and so less penetration. In the end one must warn against caliber decisions. Chose your *platform* first. Then the caliber. And then the right ammo. In the boxotruth example a fmj would have given much more penetration than the .38, many times I prefer hardcast or fmj in my revolver. out of the three decisions caliber, platform, ammo the caliber decision is the least important one. I enjoy my .38 revolver. I don't have to chase brass. I can shoot better than with a semi-auto. I can shoot faster than with a .357. I can mix different ammo types for different situations. Just perfect for me. Then again I can see why such a gun would be a very bad choice for a cop (capacity) or a hunting guide (penetration). |
September 3, 2006, 07:22 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
|
September 3, 2006, 10:15 AM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: June 21, 2006
Location: Eastern Ohio
Posts: 94
|
Just picked up a Taurus 9mm Revolver, M905 used, and have not had a chance to take out to the range yet. Thought it would be a change over the 38spl. Besides I usually carry a Taurus 92 and will be able swap out ammo.
It never hurts to put another one in the safe. |
September 3, 2006, 12:37 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2006
Location: DFW Metromess
Posts: 562
|
Recently bought a Taurus 905. I have 2 other 9mm pistols (Hi Power, and Glock 19), so the idea of having a single round apealed to me. I have had it to the range a couple of times, and have put about 100 rounds through it. I ordered 10 extra moon clips from Taurus. I would not want to shoot it regularly at the range, because the recoil is pretty snappy. It is probably just my physiology, but it begins to hurt the web between my thumb and forefinger after a few rounds. It is stainless steel, seems to disappear into a jeans or shorts pocket, and it utterly reliable. For Concealed carry purposes it is hard to beat. I usually carry the Glock, but in Summer with less clothing, I often slip the Taurus in my pocket. Accuracy? I can hit almost as well as I can with the Glock out to about 7 yards. I am a big fan, and wish they still made it.
__________________
“Life is either a daring adventure or nothing." --Helen Keller "Do not cry havoc when you should but hunt with modest warrant." --William Shakespeare Glock Certified Armorer NRA Life Member |
September 3, 2006, 02:30 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: right there
Posts: 1,882
|
Quote:
__________________
Si vis pacem - para bellum If you want peace - prepare for war |
|
September 3, 2006, 06:46 PM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: June 21, 2006
Location: Eastern Ohio
Posts: 94
|
As long as you are comfortable with whatever gets the job done!
A 22lr will work as well as a 45 if put in the right place. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|