The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 25, 2006, 07:35 PM   #1
Warhorse
Member
 
Join Date: May 26, 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 24
Green Tip .223 Ammo???

I just got a box of Lake City .223 Remington 62 grain SS109 XMB55PD Green Tip FMJ ammo.

I'm a bit of a newcomer to the AR-15 and am still well down on the learning curve. Can anyone enlighten me as to the meaning of "Green Tip?" While you're at it, what does SS109 and XMB55PD mean?

Would appreciate any info or at least a source where I can look it up.
Thanks.

BTW, if this is the wrong forum, I would also appreciate a redirect.
__________________
Speak softly but carry a big stick. -T. Roosevelt

Warhorse
Warhorse is offline  
Old June 25, 2006, 08:11 PM   #2
itman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2005
Posts: 199
ar15.com is all you need my friend
itman is offline  
Old June 25, 2006, 08:14 PM   #3
5whiskey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 23, 2005
Location: US
Posts: 1,561
The green tip is what DOD paints on their 855 ball ammo to distinguish from tracers (I guess they thought the absence of the orange magnesium wasn't enough). It actually is needed, because it is hard to tell in low light. Not sure about the nomenclature, though XMB55PD looks strikingly familiar to M855. That's the DODIC for standard 5.56 ball the DOD uses. I'm sure that ammo is supposed to be a replica for M855 ball, so it probably has a steel penetrator.
5whiskey is offline  
Old June 25, 2006, 08:55 PM   #4
DonR101395
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 30, 2005
Location: NWFL
Posts: 3,029
It's also used to ditinguish it from the 55gr ball. the 855 is 62gr.
DonR101395 is offline  
Old June 25, 2006, 09:33 PM   #5
HorseSoldier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: OCONUS 61°13′06″N 149°53′57″W
Posts: 2,282
The primary reason for the painted tip was to distinguish it from 55 grain ball, not tracer ammunition. Since performance goes to hell when you shoot 62 grain ammo out of M16A1s it was deemed an essential sort of thing, though these days it does not matter nearly as much since most everyone has switched over (may still be some USAR or NG guys equipped with A1s, maybe some USAF units as well).
HorseSoldier is offline  
Old June 26, 2006, 06:10 AM   #6
Warhorse
Member
 
Join Date: May 26, 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 24
Thanks

Thanks for all the responses. That was exactly what I wanted to know.

Apparently, I misread the XM855PD as XMB55PD. The "8" looked more like a "B" to me but it actually was an "8."

The next step is to see how accurate it is in my AR. (That's a whole different subject.) If it ever stops raining here, I'll get myself to the range.
__________________
Speak softly but carry a big stick. -T. Roosevelt

Warhorse
Warhorse is offline  
Old June 26, 2006, 06:21 PM   #7
BUSTER51
Junior member
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Location: PHOENIX, AZ
Posts: 992
WHAT YOU HAVE IS M855/SS109 SECOUNDS ,not front line ammo issued to our troops .that is what the PD is all about .no worries it's all good you will find a defective round every now and then but on the whole it shoots great,just check every round as you load your mags.
BUSTER51 is offline  
Old July 5, 2006, 09:38 AM   #8
226
Member
 
Join Date: May 7, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 99
What you have is NATO 5.56MM, not .233. Not all rifles are safe to shoot 5.56MM. Check.

What does ATK's "XM" prefix and "PD" suffix actually mean?

Ammo Oracle

...
226 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07041 seconds with 7 queries