The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 30, 1999, 07:12 PM   #1
Hair Trigger
Junior Member
 
Join Date: November 30, 1999
Location: Slippery Rock, PA
Posts: 3
I am considering buying a nib Remingtom CLassic in a 300 weatherby mag chambering.

Is the 300 weatherby a good caliber? How does it compair to a 300 win mag? What are some good loads for the 300 weatherby?

Thanks,

Hair Trigger
Hair Trigger is offline  
Old November 30, 1999, 07:50 PM   #2
Ankeny
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 1998
Location: Shoshoni, WY USA
Posts: 556
The .300 Weatherby is just a bit more potent than the .300 Win Mag. If you reload, the neck is a bit longer so you have more flexibility experimenting with various weight bullets at different seating depths. Both cartridges seem to be inherently accurate.

The only real draw back to the Weatherby is the cost of the ammunition and brass.
Ankeny is offline  
Old November 30, 1999, 08:59 PM   #3
JerryM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 1999
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,884
Hair Trigger, The 300 WM is an excellent .30 cal Magnum. I have owned one since about 1961 and have taken game from mule deer to elk, and one Kodiak bear with it. My opinion, however, will not be shared by many who will probably post on this subject. I concluded a fair number of years ago that the .30 mags are neither "fish nor fowl." I was not happy with it on game such as big bears. Sure it will work, but so will a 30-06. For our bigger game I prefer a .338 or .35 Whelen or 338-06. For the smaller big game cartridges such as .270 of '06 do all I ever needed. In addition, the .300 WM and others have too much recoil for most of us. Some will say "I never feel recoil when I am hunting." That is true, but your shooting habits are established when sighting in and practicing and the flinch will occur whether you feel the recoil or not. If you doubt this, have some one load the gun for you and shoot knowing when the gun is going to fire. Another test is to fire several shots as fast as you can work the bolt, get a sight picture, and fire. Look at your group and see if you are "pushing" the gun. This is not a problem if you have time to carefully squeeze the trigger, but is a problem if you have to make quick shots. When I used to shoot some skeet I was often amused at those who would say that recoil didn't bother them. Then they would have a misfire and nearly jump off the station. If you have made up your mind to get a .30 Mag, I think the .300WM is as good as you can do. Best, Jerry
JerryM is offline  
Old December 2, 1999, 01:45 PM   #4
TheOtherMikey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 1999
Location: Surprise, Arizona, USA
Posts: 171
No, it is an awful caliber. Send the rifle to me for disposition. Regards, Mikey

------------------
Retired, Broke, and In Need of Brass, Powder, and Shot. Will Work To Shoot!
TheOtherMikey is offline  
Old December 2, 1999, 05:46 PM   #5
JerryM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 1999
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,884
TheOtherMikey, You are allllll heart. What a fovor! Mine is an old Sako Magnum Mauser that was .300 H&H and I had it rechambered in Alaska in 1961 for the .300WM. I bought it in Caribou's for $135. At that time M 70's were going for $106 in the PX. Oh well, there are other things I wish I would have seen in the crystal ball. Regards, Jerry PS I think I'll keep the old junker.
JerryM is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07385 seconds with 9 queries