The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 16, 2006, 01:21 PM   #1
gators44
Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2005
Posts: 17
Ammunition suggestions for a .270?

Hey, This is going to be my first whitetail hunt in the fall. I had just purchased a .270 savage this week and was wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction as to what kind of ammo to buy. I know the best bullet is one that pierces the heart and lungs yada yada yada...but I just need some sort of idea please. Keep in mind I have NO experience whatsoever in this area. Thanks
gators44 is offline  
Old March 16, 2006, 01:47 PM   #2
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: Rhome, TX
Posts: 4,641
I've always had luck with the terminal performance of the ballistic tip in the .280 caliber. The soft point will do the trick too (and tend to leave a cleaner wound track when bones are hit.) I've never walked more than a hundred yards, and that one was a ballistic tip that hit a rib and pulled a JFK.
fisherman66 is offline  
Old March 16, 2006, 01:50 PM   #3
gators44
Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2005
Posts: 17
ok what's the difference between the two ballistic and soft point? What are the pros and cons? what other types are there?
gators44 is offline  
Old March 16, 2006, 02:22 PM   #4
fisherman66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2005
Location: Rhome, TX
Posts: 4,641
Quote:
ok what's the difference between the two ballistic and soft point? What are the pros and cons? what other types are there?
The ballistic tip has a plastic inverted cone at the tip and it extends into the body of the bullet in a way that forces FAST expansion. It is not for thick skinned game as it drops all the energy so fast that it is less likely to reach the vitals in an animal such as a fat bear or most African plains animals.

The soft point is a jacketed lead bullet but instead of plastic tip the lead is exposed. Often the jacket is thicker at the base of the bullet and some are bonded metal to metal. Some premium soft points are framed with internal connections.
fisherman66 is offline  
Old March 16, 2006, 03:53 PM   #5
Fremmer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,482
Let your rifle make the decision for you. In other words, buy 4 or 5 different brands of ammo, and take them to the range. Use the one that shoots most accurately. I suppose I'd try 130 grain loads, but I'd also try some 150 grainers too, just to see how they shoot.

Just about any soft-point ammo will kill deer quite well. Heck, the inexpensive plain-jane Remington core-lokt ammo will do the trick. No need for premium ammo, unless that is what shoots the best through your rifle.
Fremmer is offline  
Old March 16, 2006, 06:16 PM   #6
FirstFreedom
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2004
Location: The Toll Road State, U.S.A.
Posts: 12,451
Just use a 130, 140, or a 150 grainer, and no lighter of a bullet, and hit them in the breadbasket, and it will work. For deer, doesn't matter if its ballistic tip or softpoint; nor is a premium bonded or partition bullet required. Just use 130 grains or up and it'll work fine, provided a good hit is made.
FirstFreedom is offline  
Old March 16, 2006, 06:21 PM   #7
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,451
For deer, the old 130-grain has always been the standard in the .270.

Unless you expect bucks to dress out above 150 pounds, most any old bullet will do--unless you're planning on quartering-away shots on a running buck. Whatever standard bullet that groups best...

Art
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is online now  
Old March 16, 2006, 09:22 PM   #8
Hello123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 21, 2005
Posts: 571
Any bullet above 130 grains in a 270 will kill a deer easily. I have found that there are few bullets more accurate than the ballistic tip. It will convey a lot of energy to the target quickly as well.
Hello123 is offline  
Old March 20, 2006, 01:59 PM   #9
jhgreasemonkey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2006
Location: 46.199ºN 122.188ºW by way of Tacoma Wa
Posts: 2,236
I Shot A Medium Sized Mule Deer At 100yds In The Chest And It Dropped Dead Instantly With The Standard Federal Ammo .270. Nothing Fancy. I Think That Cartridge Has Plenty Of Power For Deer. You Dont Need To Spend Money On Anything Special.
jhgreasemonkey is offline  
Old March 20, 2006, 02:46 PM   #10
kingudaroad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2005
Location: austin
Posts: 735
My remington 700 loves 130 gr but will not shoot 150 gr well at all.I've heard people say the opposite also.You need to try some different weights and see which group better and go with a bullet of that weight.I like the nosler ballistic tip in 130 gr but the deer don't like them at all.
kingudaroad is offline  
Old March 20, 2006, 10:34 PM   #11
taylorce1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: On the Santa Fe Trail
Posts: 5,428
Haven't dropped a deer yet with my .270, but 130 grain Sierras pushed by an ample amount of H4895 have accounted for three Pronghorns. On my last elk I used 150 grain Federal Premium ammo and I have 19 rnds left over to use next year. I grabbed the wrong box of reloads on the way to hunt elk and had to buy the Federals, they shot great took the cow broadside at 250yds and she drooped like a rock. I think any bullet in the 130-150 range will get the job done quite handily. Great choice on caliber the .270 is a fun cartridge to shoot and very versatile
taylorce1 is online now  
Old March 20, 2006, 11:11 PM   #12
MeekAndMild
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2001
Posts: 4,988
FWIW ballistic tips hold their shape better than soft lead tips when they are subject to the sort of abuse that comes from carrying them around in boxes and pockets, loading and unloading, dropping, banging the front of the magazine and having dogs chew on them.
__________________
In a few years when the dust finally clears and people start counting their change there is a pretty good chance that President Obama may become known as The Great Absquatulator. You heard it first here on TFL.
MeekAndMild is offline  
Old March 20, 2006, 11:50 PM   #13
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,451
MandM, I got curious, one time, about the effect of tip-battering on accuracy. I was always twitchy about the last couple of round in the magazine: pretty flat-nosed after the first three or four shots.

So, going to the bench rest with a "pure" bullet and varying degrees of others with some flattening, I shot for group. Just as good a group as usual, so I quit worrying about it. I also read in The Dope Bag that they had the same result...

Art
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is online now  
Old March 21, 2006, 03:46 PM   #14
Mannlicher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2001
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 2,970
In my years of using a .270, I have found that Federal Classic, and Remington CoreLokt 130 grain do a fine job. They are not as sexy or as expensive as ballistic tips, or core bonds or whatever, but they do kill deer.
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacesset

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.".........Ronald Reagan
Mannlicher is offline  
Old March 21, 2006, 06:15 PM   #15
sparkysteve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2005
Location: Byron Center, Michigan
Posts: 418
I suggest Winchester Supreme Ballistic Silvertips. They have knocked down every deer I've shot with them. In 130 or 150 grain.


Plus they have a silver colored case and look really cool.
__________________
I have ADHD........Attention, Defficit, Hey there goes a squirrel!

Dont tread on me.
sparkysteve is offline  
Old March 21, 2006, 08:04 PM   #16
Fat White Boy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 18, 2005
Posts: 1,276
I have a Winchester M70 Black Shadow in .270. At 100 yards using stock Remington Corelokt 130gr Bullets, it shoots cloverleafs on paper. Using the 130 gr bullet, I have taken hogs over 200 pounds. The Corelokts knock 'em down, right now....Also- The corelokts go all the way through.
Fat White Boy is offline  
Old March 25, 2006, 12:08 AM   #17
jamaica
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2006
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 520
130

Remington Core Lokt in 130 grain would be my choice if it will shoot accurately in your gun.

I reload for my 270 and use a 130 gr Hornady spire point. That is a soft nose bullet. Very effective on deer.

Good choice of caliber.
The 270 shoots fast and flat, has plenty of power for any North American game, doesn't bust your shoulder, or give you scope "ring around the eye". Ammo is usually available, and is reasonable in price.

My experience shows that the 130 grain bullet from a 270 will usually go clear through a deer. Best shoot its head off if you want any meat left.

All the ying and yang about bullet types etc is in vain anyway. The trick is to learn to hit the target with whatever you decide to use. Do plenty of shooting before the hunt.

Good luck in the hunt.
jamaica is offline  
Old March 25, 2006, 08:06 PM   #18
gators44
Member
 
Join Date: December 30, 2005
Posts: 17
Hey everyone thanks for the advice...right now I just bought a bunch of the Federal power-shock 130 grain for target practice and getting used to the rifle (it's my first gun). I may get some other based on these suggestions for the hunt in the fall. Once again thanks, this site has been awesome as I have gone from knowing absolutely nothing about guns 2 months ago to being able to talk to a lot of different people who have been shooting their whole lives. Just to give you some idea I couldn't tell a shotgun from a rifle about 2 months ago and this week I bought a savage .270 w/ a 3-9 leupold VXII scope (good choice?).
gators44 is offline  
Old March 25, 2006, 09:33 PM   #19
Art Eatman
Staff Lead
 
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX, USA
Posts: 22,451
Yeah, gators, ya done good. Good rifle, good scope...

Art
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is online now  
Old March 26, 2006, 01:22 AM   #20
Eghad
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,231
yupper......good choice on the rifle and scope and the ammo. Good hunting in the fall and dont forget to post a pic if you get one.
__________________
Have a nice day at the range

NRA Life Member
Eghad is offline  
Old March 26, 2006, 05:54 PM   #21
biglabsrule
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2006
Location: Adirondack Park, upstate NY north of Utica
Posts: 385
yeah awesome scope, i want a leupold, all i have is a 3-9x50 simmons prosport on my remington 7400 carbine in '06
__________________
got me a little lady, the gun buying has come to an end, sigh
biglabsrule is offline  
Old March 26, 2006, 06:20 PM   #22
22-rimfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,594
I would choose either the 130 or 150 gr SP bullets like most of the recommendations. I use the 150 grainers year after year and have no problem. If I get a shot, I usually get a deer.

Choose whichever cartridge you lean toward and take the rifle to the range and sight the scope in. I usually sight it in at 2" high at 100 yds. Next, I would buy a box or two of each and take the rifle to the range and see how EACH shoots in your gun.

You made a good choice of rifles and scope. I have not done vast amounts of shooting of the 270 in the last few years. Usually take it out in the late summer/early fall and shoot some paper to confirm that the scope settings are still good. I have been pretty much leaning toward using a handgun these days for whitetail unless I'm hunting very open woods or fields.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old April 1, 2006, 02:24 AM   #23
jamaica
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2006
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 520
Quoting 22-rimfire: I usually sight it in at 2" high at 100 yds. End quote

Yes! This good practice. With the flat shooting 270 sighted in 2" high at 100 yards, you will be right on at 200 and about 3.5 low at 300. You can shoot point blank at deer up to 300 yards and make a good hit without worrying about calculating the range.
jamaica is offline  
Old April 1, 2006, 06:27 AM   #24
Pointer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 8, 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,559
Federal Premium 130 grain Vital-Shok Barnes TSX will make the .270 perform "pooty good" at the terminal end...

ART
Quote:
Just as good a group as usual, so I quit worrying about it.
Careful here...
The accuracy problems will not manifest themselves until the bullet slows some... at longer ranges...

Then... cross winds, frontal winds and horse-flies will begin to have a greater and greater effect.
__________________
.
"Political correctness is tyranny with a happy face." Charlton Heston

30-06 FOREVER

Last edited by Pointer; April 1, 2006 at 06:16 PM.
Pointer is offline  
Old April 1, 2006, 10:03 AM   #25
Fremmer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 19, 2005
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,482
Quote:
(good choice?)
Yes.

Now buy lots of ammo, and shoot the heck out of the gun; get really familiar with it this summer, and you'll be ready when hunting season gets here.

That is what I did last summer (I went through at least 250 rounds), and I was very comfortable with the gun and scope when it was time to hunt.
Fremmer is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.13888 seconds with 7 queries